Towards non-invasive assessment of myocardial work using myocardial stiffness and strain: a human pilot study.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging Pub Date : 2025-05-30 DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jeaf089
Maelys Venet, Jerome Baranger, Aimen Malik, Minh B Nguyen, Seema Mital, Mark K Friedberg, Mathieu Pernot, Clement Papadacci, Sebastien Salles, Rajiv Chaturvedi, Luc Mertens, Olivier Villemain
{"title":"Towards non-invasive assessment of myocardial work using myocardial stiffness and strain: a human pilot study.","authors":"Maelys Venet, Jerome Baranger, Aimen Malik, Minh B Nguyen, Seema Mital, Mark K Friedberg, Mathieu Pernot, Clement Papadacci, Sebastien Salles, Rajiv Chaturvedi, Luc Mertens, Olivier Villemain","doi":"10.1093/ehjci/jeaf089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Myocardial work assessment has emerged as a promising tool for left ventricular (LV) performance evaluation. Existing non-invasive methods for assessing it rely on assumptions on LV pressure and geometry. Recently, shear wave elastography allowed to quantify changes in myocardial stiffness throughout the cardiac cycle. Based on Hooke's law, it becomes theoretically possible to calculate myocardial stress and work from myocardial stiffness and strain measurements. The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of this comprehensive ultrasound approach and to compare myocardial work values between populations where variations are anticipated.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), aortic stenosis (AS) and healthy volunteers (HV) were included in this study. Segment dimensions, strain, thickness, and segmental myocardial stiffness were assessed in the basal antero-septal segment throughout the cardiac cycle. One-beat segmental work, the stress-strain loop area, and contributive and dissipative work were compared between groups. Twenty HV (9.8 ± 5.3 years of age), 20 HCM (10.0 ± 6.1 years of age), and 5 AS (5.3 ± 4.3 years of age) subjects were included. One-beat segmental work was significantly higher in AS (272.0 ± 102.9 µJ/mm) and lower in HCM (38.2 ± 106.9 µJ/mm) compared with HV (131.1 ± 83.3 µJ/mm), P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively. Desynchronized work was prevailing in HCM with dissipative work during systole measured at 17.3 ± 28.9 µJ/mm and contributive work during diastole measured at 15.3 ± 18.0 µJ/mm. The stress-strain loop area was higher in AS (95.2 ± 31.1 kPa%) and HV (66.2 ± 35.9 kPa%) than in HCM (5.8 ± 13.0 kPa%), P < 0.01.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Calculating segmental myocardial work based on myocardial stiffness and strain measurements is technically feasible. This approach overcomes the inherent limitations of current methods by introducing a direct quantitative measure of myocardial stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":12026,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"1051-1064"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Myocardial work assessment has emerged as a promising tool for left ventricular (LV) performance evaluation. Existing non-invasive methods for assessing it rely on assumptions on LV pressure and geometry. Recently, shear wave elastography allowed to quantify changes in myocardial stiffness throughout the cardiac cycle. Based on Hooke's law, it becomes theoretically possible to calculate myocardial stress and work from myocardial stiffness and strain measurements. The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of this comprehensive ultrasound approach and to compare myocardial work values between populations where variations are anticipated.

Methods and results: Children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), aortic stenosis (AS) and healthy volunteers (HV) were included in this study. Segment dimensions, strain, thickness, and segmental myocardial stiffness were assessed in the basal antero-septal segment throughout the cardiac cycle. One-beat segmental work, the stress-strain loop area, and contributive and dissipative work were compared between groups. Twenty HV (9.8 ± 5.3 years of age), 20 HCM (10.0 ± 6.1 years of age), and 5 AS (5.3 ± 4.3 years of age) subjects were included. One-beat segmental work was significantly higher in AS (272.0 ± 102.9 µJ/mm) and lower in HCM (38.2 ± 106.9 µJ/mm) compared with HV (131.1 ± 83.3 µJ/mm), P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively. Desynchronized work was prevailing in HCM with dissipative work during systole measured at 17.3 ± 28.9 µJ/mm and contributive work during diastole measured at 15.3 ± 18.0 µJ/mm. The stress-strain loop area was higher in AS (95.2 ± 31.1 kPa%) and HV (66.2 ± 35.9 kPa%) than in HCM (5.8 ± 13.0 kPa%), P < 0.01.

Conclusion: Calculating segmental myocardial work based on myocardial stiffness and strain measurements is technically feasible. This approach overcomes the inherent limitations of current methods by introducing a direct quantitative measure of myocardial stress.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用心肌僵硬度和应变对心肌工作进行无创评估:一项人体试验研究。
背景:心肌功评估已成为一种很有前途的左心室功能评估工具。现有的无创评估方法依赖于左室压力和几何形状的假设。最近,横波弹性成像可以量化整个心脏周期中心肌刚度的变化。根据胡克定律,从理论上可以通过测量心肌刚度和应变来计算心肌应力和功。本研究的主要目的是证明这种综合超声方法的可行性,并在预期变化的人群之间比较心肌工作值。方法:将肥厚性心肌病(HCM)、主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患儿和健康志愿者(HV)纳入研究。在整个心脏周期内评估基底前间隔段的节段尺寸、应变、厚度和节段心肌刚度。比较各组间单节拍分段功、应力-应变环面积、贡献功和耗散功。结果:HV 20例(9.8±5.3岁),HCM 20例(10.0±6.1岁),AS 5例(5.3±4.3岁)。单拍节段功在AS组(272.0±102.9µJ/mm)显著高于HV组(131.1±83.3µJ/mm),在HCM组(38.2±106.9µJ/mm)显著低于HV组(p=0.02和p=0.01)。非同步功在HCM中普遍存在,收缩期耗散功为17.3±28.9µJ/mm,舒张期贡献功为15.3±18.0µJ/mm。应力-应变环路面积AS组(95.2±31.1 kpa %)和HV组(66.2±35.9 kpa %)高于HCM组(5.8±13.0 kpa %)。结论:基于心肌刚度和应变测量计算节段心肌功在技术上是可行的。这种方法克服了现有方法的固有局限性,引入了心肌应激的直接定量测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
708
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging is a monthly international peer reviewed journal dealing with Cardiovascular Imaging. It is an official publication of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical from all areas of cardiovascular imaging including echocardiography, magnetic resonance, computed tomography, nuclear and invasive imaging. A range of article types will be considered, including original research, reviews, editorials, image focus, letters and recommendation papers from relevant groups of the European Society of Cardiology. In addition it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging.
期刊最新文献
Giant Congenital Muscular Diverticulum of the Left Ventricular Outflow: multimodality imaging insights. Response to: "Vessel-level FFR prevalence and CCTA rule-in/rule-out language". Beyond sudden cardiac death: the left atrium as a window into disease progression in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. From the Tricuspid Valve to the Iliac artery: Paradoxical TriClip Embolization. Discussion forum response to: High diagnostic yield of family echocardiographic screening of children with bicuspid aortic valve: a critical appraisal and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1