Slow/Fast Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Catheter Ablation Guided by Atrial Resetting: The New Insight.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart rhythm Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.03.1940
Saer Abu-Alrub, Finet Florian, Antoine Boudias, Pierre-Antoine Catalan, Frédéric Jean, Guillaume Clerfond, Romain Eschalier, Grégoire Massoullié
{"title":"Slow/Fast Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Catheter Ablation Guided by Atrial Resetting: The New Insight.","authors":"Saer Abu-Alrub, Finet Florian, Antoine Boudias, Pierre-Antoine Catalan, Frédéric Jean, Guillaume Clerfond, Romain Eschalier, Grégoire Massoullié","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.03.1940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial resetting can be used for discerning the anterograde pathway in slow/fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess the prevalence of right inferior extension (RIE) and left extension (LE) and the potential impact on the ablation approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During the electrophysiological study of patients with slow/fast AVNRT, a decremental supraventricular extrastimulus was delivered within the vulnerability window of the tachycardia cycle at two distinct sites: the infero-paraseptal area of the Koch triangle (near the RIE) and the proximal few centimeters of the coronary sinus (near the LE). The site with the latest extrastimulus (longest H-Stim) that could reset the tachycardia was defined as the site of the anterograde slow pathway.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six patients were enrolled over a 1-year period. Resetting couldn't be performed in 10 patients (28%) due to non-sustained tachycardia and one patient due to failed atrial capture. Among the remaining 25 patients (69%), 18 (72%) had the best resetting from the RIE, 5 (20%) from the LE, and 2 (8%) had two alternating AVNRT. The mean H-Stim value in the RIE position was longer when resetting favored RIE compared to LE (46±13 vs 16±21ms; p<0.001); a similar pattern was observed in the LE position (59±20 vs 15±18ms; p<0.001). Ablation of the left inferior extension could be performed from the right side but significantly closer to the His bundle compared to the RIE (9.6±3 vs. 18.5±4mm, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Left extension AVNRT is a common finding and can be ablated by a right-sided approach in most cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.03.1940","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Atrial resetting can be used for discerning the anterograde pathway in slow/fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).

Objectives: Assess the prevalence of right inferior extension (RIE) and left extension (LE) and the potential impact on the ablation approach.

Methods: During the electrophysiological study of patients with slow/fast AVNRT, a decremental supraventricular extrastimulus was delivered within the vulnerability window of the tachycardia cycle at two distinct sites: the infero-paraseptal area of the Koch triangle (near the RIE) and the proximal few centimeters of the coronary sinus (near the LE). The site with the latest extrastimulus (longest H-Stim) that could reset the tachycardia was defined as the site of the anterograde slow pathway.

Results: Thirty-six patients were enrolled over a 1-year period. Resetting couldn't be performed in 10 patients (28%) due to non-sustained tachycardia and one patient due to failed atrial capture. Among the remaining 25 patients (69%), 18 (72%) had the best resetting from the RIE, 5 (20%) from the LE, and 2 (8%) had two alternating AVNRT. The mean H-Stim value in the RIE position was longer when resetting favored RIE compared to LE (46±13 vs 16±21ms; p<0.001); a similar pattern was observed in the LE position (59±20 vs 15±18ms; p<0.001). Ablation of the left inferior extension could be performed from the right side but significantly closer to the His bundle compared to the RIE (9.6±3 vs. 18.5±4mm, p<0.001).

Conclusion: Left extension AVNRT is a common finding and can be ablated by a right-sided approach in most cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
期刊最新文献
Mortality and Readmissions after Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: An Analysis of Inpatient and Outpatient State Databases. Slow/Fast Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Catheter Ablation Guided by Atrial Resetting: The New Insight. Extent of Myocardial Injury after Pulmonary Vein Isolation using Three Different Pulsed-field Ablation Systems. Long-term Efficacy of a Standardized Catheter Ablation Strategy Utilizing Recent Advanced Technologies in Preventing Permanent Atrial Fibrillation. Comparison of 30-day complications between a tine-based and a screw-in helix fixation single-chamber ventricular leadless pacemaker. Results of a propensity-matched analysis from a multicentre, nationwide registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1