Jukka-Pekka Pietilä, Tuuve Häkkinen, Jukka Ollgren, Anu Kantele
{"title":"Modelling international travel as risk of acquiring Dientamoeba fragilis: comparison to Giardia duodenalis data.","authors":"Jukka-Pekka Pietilä, Tuuve Häkkinen, Jukka Ollgren, Anu Kantele","doi":"10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intestinal parasite Dientamoeba fragilis (DF) is spread worldwide and can cause prolonged gastrointestinal symptoms, yet its link to international travel has been scarcely studied. To explore this connection, we examined the association between DF cases and international travel history by destination, comparing the findings to data on Giardia duodenalis (GD), a common travel-acquired intestinal parasite.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed clinical data from patients with DF or GD infection in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, categorizing the patients as travellers and non-travellers on the basis of their travel history. To assess acquisition risk by destination, we devised a DF/GD risk score (RS) relating case numbers to travel volumes as denominators in each destination, with travel data retrieved from the Official Statistics of Finland (OSF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Travel history was reported less frequently by patients with DF (30%) than GD (60%). DF had the highest RSs for Africa (41.3), followed by Asia and Oceania (17.9) and the Americas (11.5). The respective GD RSs were 32.8, 25.4, and 11.9. The lowest RSs for both parasites were recorded for Eastern and Western Europe, Russia and the Baltic countries, and Scandinavia. For Asia and Oceania, the GD RS exceeded that of DF; for the other sites, DF had higher RSs than GD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dientamoeba fragilis appears to be transmitted both domestically and internationally. Although the overall acquisition risk appears low, for both Dientamoeba fragilis and Giardia duodenalis, the highest RSs are linked to visits to (sub)tropical regions, with subregional differences between the two parasites.</p>","PeriodicalId":23312,"journal":{"name":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"102836"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102836","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The intestinal parasite Dientamoeba fragilis (DF) is spread worldwide and can cause prolonged gastrointestinal symptoms, yet its link to international travel has been scarcely studied. To explore this connection, we examined the association between DF cases and international travel history by destination, comparing the findings to data on Giardia duodenalis (GD), a common travel-acquired intestinal parasite.
Methods: We analysed clinical data from patients with DF or GD infection in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, categorizing the patients as travellers and non-travellers on the basis of their travel history. To assess acquisition risk by destination, we devised a DF/GD risk score (RS) relating case numbers to travel volumes as denominators in each destination, with travel data retrieved from the Official Statistics of Finland (OSF).
Results: Travel history was reported less frequently by patients with DF (30%) than GD (60%). DF had the highest RSs for Africa (41.3), followed by Asia and Oceania (17.9) and the Americas (11.5). The respective GD RSs were 32.8, 25.4, and 11.9. The lowest RSs for both parasites were recorded for Eastern and Western Europe, Russia and the Baltic countries, and Scandinavia. For Asia and Oceania, the GD RS exceeded that of DF; for the other sites, DF had higher RSs than GD.
Conclusions: Dientamoeba fragilis appears to be transmitted both domestically and internationally. Although the overall acquisition risk appears low, for both Dientamoeba fragilis and Giardia duodenalis, the highest RSs are linked to visits to (sub)tropical regions, with subregional differences between the two parasites.
期刊介绍:
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
Publication Scope:
Publishes original papers, reviews, and consensus papers
Primary theme: infectious disease in the context of travel medicine
Focus Areas:
Epidemiology and surveillance of travel-related illness
Prevention and treatment of travel-associated infections
Malaria prevention and treatment
Travellers' diarrhoea
Infections associated with mass gatherings
Migration-related infections
Vaccines and vaccine-preventable disease
Global policy/regulations for disease prevention and control
Practical clinical issues for travel and tropical medicine practitioners
Coverage:
Addresses areas of controversy and debate in travel medicine
Aims to inform guidelines and policy pertinent to travel medicine and the prevention of infectious disease
Publication Features:
Offers a fast peer-review process
Provides early online publication of accepted manuscripts
Aims to publish cutting-edge papers