{"title":"Palliative care education as an integrated component of pulmonary rehabilitation: a real-world mixed-methods feasibility study.","authors":"M Aurora Mendes, Daisy Ja Janssen, Alda Marques","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the feasibility of integrating palliative care education in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods feasibility study was conducted in people with chronic respiratory diseases enrolled in 12-weeks outpatient hospital-based PR. A session about palliative care was integrated in the education content. Feasibility was assessed by attendance to the palliative care session, feasibility and acceptability of outcome assessment, acceptability of the intervention and undesirable effects. After PR, two focus groups were carried out. Descriptive and inductive thematic analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 44 individuals referred to PR, 14 were excluded, six declined to participate and two were referred to another rehabilitation programme. Twenty-two people with chronic respiratory diseases started PR, however, six had discontinued the programme at the time of the palliative care session. Attendance to this session was 81% (n=13/16; 11 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 1 severe asthma and 1 interstitial lung disease; 77% men, 65±9 years-old, FEV<sub>1</sub> 41±21% of predicted). Outcome assessment was completed in 77% (n=10/13) of participants and lasted approximately 90 minutes. Three themes were identified from the focus groups: daily living with a chronic respiratory disease, meaningful care and demystifying misconceptions. Participants found the intervention and outcome assessment acceptable. An improvement in knowledge and change of attitude towards palliative care was considered a major effect of the palliative care session. No undesirable effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Integrating an education session about palliative care in PR is feasible, meaningful for people with chronic respiratory diseases, and has no undesirable effects. A randomised controlled study is being prepared to strengthen these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108034"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To explore the feasibility of integrating palliative care education in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR).
Methods: A mixed-methods feasibility study was conducted in people with chronic respiratory diseases enrolled in 12-weeks outpatient hospital-based PR. A session about palliative care was integrated in the education content. Feasibility was assessed by attendance to the palliative care session, feasibility and acceptability of outcome assessment, acceptability of the intervention and undesirable effects. After PR, two focus groups were carried out. Descriptive and inductive thematic analyses were performed.
Results: Out of 44 individuals referred to PR, 14 were excluded, six declined to participate and two were referred to another rehabilitation programme. Twenty-two people with chronic respiratory diseases started PR, however, six had discontinued the programme at the time of the palliative care session. Attendance to this session was 81% (n=13/16; 11 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 1 severe asthma and 1 interstitial lung disease; 77% men, 65±9 years-old, FEV1 41±21% of predicted). Outcome assessment was completed in 77% (n=10/13) of participants and lasted approximately 90 minutes. Three themes were identified from the focus groups: daily living with a chronic respiratory disease, meaningful care and demystifying misconceptions. Participants found the intervention and outcome assessment acceptable. An improvement in knowledge and change of attitude towards palliative care was considered a major effect of the palliative care session. No undesirable effects were reported.
Discussion: Integrating an education session about palliative care in PR is feasible, meaningful for people with chronic respiratory diseases, and has no undesirable effects. A randomised controlled study is being prepared to strengthen these results.
期刊介绍:
Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants.
Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.