Climate stress test: bad (or good) news for the market? An event study analisys on euro zone banks

IF 0.8 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Annals of Finance Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1007/s10436-024-00459-0
Costanza Torricelli, Chiara Pederzoli, Fabio Ferrari
{"title":"Climate stress test: bad (or good) news for the market? An event study analisys on euro zone banks","authors":"Costanza Torricelli,&nbsp;Chiara Pederzoli,&nbsp;Fabio Ferrari","doi":"10.1007/s10436-024-00459-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates how the 2021 ECB Climate stress test affected the market view on the climate risk exposure of the banking sector. To this end, we set up an event study analysis on stock returns of the banks included in the exercise, whereby at the relevant dates we test for the existence of abnormal returns. The potential hypothesis is that bad/good news on climate risks exposure of banks may negatively/positively impacts their profitability and hence stock returns. Three main results emerge from our analyses. First, the stress test announcement had no significant impact on banks stock returns, a result that can be explained by the type of information given, i.e. only the methodology and some preliminary mainly qualitative evidence. Second, and by contrast, the publication of the final results with quantitative details determined a positive significant reaction, since the market possibly expected banks’ exposure to climate risks to be greater. Third, an event related to the worldwide consensus on the need to manage climate change (COP26), yet not strictly related to the climate stress test, had no significant market impact. Our results, which are robust to various checks, may have policy implications for future climate stress tests and institutional initiatives needed to manage climate risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45289,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Finance","volume":"21 1","pages":"1 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10436-024-00459-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates how the 2021 ECB Climate stress test affected the market view on the climate risk exposure of the banking sector. To this end, we set up an event study analysis on stock returns of the banks included in the exercise, whereby at the relevant dates we test for the existence of abnormal returns. The potential hypothesis is that bad/good news on climate risks exposure of banks may negatively/positively impacts their profitability and hence stock returns. Three main results emerge from our analyses. First, the stress test announcement had no significant impact on banks stock returns, a result that can be explained by the type of information given, i.e. only the methodology and some preliminary mainly qualitative evidence. Second, and by contrast, the publication of the final results with quantitative details determined a positive significant reaction, since the market possibly expected banks’ exposure to climate risks to be greater. Third, an event related to the worldwide consensus on the need to manage climate change (COP26), yet not strictly related to the climate stress test, had no significant market impact. Our results, which are robust to various checks, may have policy implications for future climate stress tests and institutional initiatives needed to manage climate risk.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文研究了 2021 年欧洲央行气候压力测试如何影响市场对银行业气候风险敞口的看法。为此,我们对参与测试的银行的股票回报率进行了事件研究分析,以检验在相关日期是否存在异常回报。潜在的假设是,有关银行气候风险敞口的坏消息/好消息可能会对其盈利能力产生负面/正面影响,从而影响股票回报率。我们的分析得出了三个主要结果。首先,压力测试公告对银行股票回报率没有重大影响,这一结果可以用所提供信息的类型来解释,即只有方法和一些初步的主要是定性的证据。其次,与此相反,公布最终结果和定量细节后,市场做出了积极的重大反应,因为市场可能预期银行面临的气候风险会更大。第三,与全球就管理气候变化的必要性达成共识(COP26)有关的事件,虽然与气候压力测试没有严格的关系,但对市场没有重大影响。我们的研究结果经得起各种检验,可能对未来的气候压力测试和管理气候风险所需的制度举措具有政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Finance
Annals of Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Annals of Finance provides an outlet for original research in all areas of finance and its applications to other disciplines having a clear and substantive link to the general theme of finance. In particular, innovative research papers of moderate length of the highest quality in all scientific areas that are motivated by the analysis of financial problems will be considered. Annals of Finance''s scope encompasses - but is not limited to - the following areas: accounting and finance, asset pricing, banking and finance, capital markets and finance, computational finance, corporate finance, derivatives, dynamical and chaotic systems in finance, economics and finance, empirical finance, experimental finance, finance and the theory of the firm, financial econometrics, financial institutions, mathematical finance, money and finance, portfolio analysis, regulation, stochastic analysis and finance, stock market analysis, systemic risk and financial stability. Annals of Finance also publishes special issues on any topic in finance and its applications of current interest. A small section, entitled finance notes, will be devoted solely to publishing short articles – up to ten pages in length, of substantial interest in finance. Officially cited as: Ann Finance
期刊最新文献
Climate stress test: bad (or good) news for the market? An event study analisys on euro zone banks The (un)secured debt puzzle: evidence for U.S. public firms No arbitrage for a special class of filtration expansions Approximation and asymptotics in the superhedging problem for binary options Probability of no default for a microloan under uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1