Bill to standardize court mental health evaluations passes West Virginia House

{"title":"Bill to standardize court mental health evaluations passes West Virginia House","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/mhw.34381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>West Virginia lawmakers have moved to standardize the state's process for deciding whether to place residents in mental health institutions by creating a new role to oversee the process, West Virginia Public Broadcasting reported March 12. The West Virginia House of Delegates last week passed House Bill 2347, which would create mental hygiene regions with commissioners overseen by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. These commissioners would be trained attorneys who would oversee mental health evaluations regarding required institutionalization for residents experiencing mental health crises. The bill would also allow mental health evaluations to take place through video conferencing. During floor discussion Del. Brandon Steele, R-Raleigh, said he worries the bill would remove proceedings from local control, and said he voted against a similar bill during last year's legislative session, referring to the 2024 House Bill 5254. “You need somebody on the ground in your county that knows you and knows the lay of the land, and not a regional person appointed by a bureaucrat out of the Supreme Court,” Steele said. Steele stressed that an involuntary institutionalization can have permanent effects on people's gun ownership amendment rights and professional future. But proponents of the bill like lead sponsor Del. Evan Worrell (R-Cabell), say it standardizes the state's mental hygiene process and streamlines what can be a lengthy procedure. Despite Steele's concerns, the bill passed the House by a vote of 69 to 26. The bill now heads to the West Virginia Senate for further consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":100916,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Weekly","volume":"35 11","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Weekly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhw.34381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

West Virginia lawmakers have moved to standardize the state's process for deciding whether to place residents in mental health institutions by creating a new role to oversee the process, West Virginia Public Broadcasting reported March 12. The West Virginia House of Delegates last week passed House Bill 2347, which would create mental hygiene regions with commissioners overseen by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. These commissioners would be trained attorneys who would oversee mental health evaluations regarding required institutionalization for residents experiencing mental health crises. The bill would also allow mental health evaluations to take place through video conferencing. During floor discussion Del. Brandon Steele, R-Raleigh, said he worries the bill would remove proceedings from local control, and said he voted against a similar bill during last year's legislative session, referring to the 2024 House Bill 5254. “You need somebody on the ground in your county that knows you and knows the lay of the land, and not a regional person appointed by a bureaucrat out of the Supreme Court,” Steele said. Steele stressed that an involuntary institutionalization can have permanent effects on people's gun ownership amendment rights and professional future. But proponents of the bill like lead sponsor Del. Evan Worrell (R-Cabell), say it standardizes the state's mental hygiene process and streamlines what can be a lengthy procedure. Despite Steele's concerns, the bill passed the House by a vote of 69 to 26. The bill now heads to the West Virginia Senate for further consideration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FDA decision on REMS would encourage better treatment access Bill to standardize court mental health evaluations passes West Virginia House Coming Up… Policy experts urge California-federal partnership to preserve investments In Case You Haven't Heard…
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1