Bill to standardize court mental health evaluations passes West Virginia House

{"title":"Bill to standardize court mental health evaluations passes West Virginia House","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/mhw.34381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>West Virginia lawmakers have moved to standardize the state's process for deciding whether to place residents in mental health institutions by creating a new role to oversee the process, West Virginia Public Broadcasting reported March 12. The West Virginia House of Delegates last week passed House Bill 2347, which would create mental hygiene regions with commissioners overseen by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. These commissioners would be trained attorneys who would oversee mental health evaluations regarding required institutionalization for residents experiencing mental health crises. The bill would also allow mental health evaluations to take place through video conferencing. During floor discussion Del. Brandon Steele, R-Raleigh, said he worries the bill would remove proceedings from local control, and said he voted against a similar bill during last year's legislative session, referring to the 2024 House Bill 5254. “You need somebody on the ground in your county that knows you and knows the lay of the land, and not a regional person appointed by a bureaucrat out of the Supreme Court,” Steele said. Steele stressed that an involuntary institutionalization can have permanent effects on people's gun ownership amendment rights and professional future. But proponents of the bill like lead sponsor Del. Evan Worrell (R-Cabell), say it standardizes the state's mental hygiene process and streamlines what can be a lengthy procedure. Despite Steele's concerns, the bill passed the House by a vote of 69 to 26. The bill now heads to the West Virginia Senate for further consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":100916,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Weekly","volume":"35 11","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Weekly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhw.34381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

West Virginia lawmakers have moved to standardize the state's process for deciding whether to place residents in mental health institutions by creating a new role to oversee the process, West Virginia Public Broadcasting reported March 12. The West Virginia House of Delegates last week passed House Bill 2347, which would create mental hygiene regions with commissioners overseen by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. These commissioners would be trained attorneys who would oversee mental health evaluations regarding required institutionalization for residents experiencing mental health crises. The bill would also allow mental health evaluations to take place through video conferencing. During floor discussion Del. Brandon Steele, R-Raleigh, said he worries the bill would remove proceedings from local control, and said he voted against a similar bill during last year's legislative session, referring to the 2024 House Bill 5254. “You need somebody on the ground in your county that knows you and knows the lay of the land, and not a regional person appointed by a bureaucrat out of the Supreme Court,” Steele said. Steele stressed that an involuntary institutionalization can have permanent effects on people's gun ownership amendment rights and professional future. But proponents of the bill like lead sponsor Del. Evan Worrell (R-Cabell), say it standardizes the state's mental hygiene process and streamlines what can be a lengthy procedure. Despite Steele's concerns, the bill passed the House by a vote of 69 to 26. The bill now heads to the West Virginia Senate for further consideration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西弗吉尼亚州众议院通过了一项规范法庭心理健康评估的法案
西弗吉尼亚州公共广播公司3月12日报道,西弗吉尼亚州的立法者已经采取行动,通过设立一个新的角色来监督这一过程,使该州决定是否将居民安置在精神卫生机构的程序标准化。西弗吉尼亚州众议院上周通过了众议院2347号法案,该法案将设立精神卫生区,并由西弗吉尼亚州最高上诉法院监督专员。这些专员将是受过培训的律师,他们将监督精神健康评估,以确定对经历精神健康危机的居民进行必要的收容。该法案还将允许通过视频会议进行心理健康评估。在讨论会上,德尔。R-Raleigh的布兰登·斯蒂尔(Brandon Steele)表示,他担心该法案将取消地方控制的程序,并表示他在去年的立法会议上投票反对了一项类似的法案,指的是2024年众议院第5254号法案。斯蒂尔说:“你需要的是一个了解你、了解形势的人,而不是一个由最高法院任命的地方官员。”斯蒂尔强调,非自愿的制度化可能对人们的枪支所有权修正案权利和职业未来产生永久性影响。但该法案的支持者,如主要发起人德尔。埃文·沃勒尔(R-Cabell)表示,这使该州的心理卫生过程标准化,并简化了可能是一个漫长的过程。尽管斯蒂尔表示担忧,该法案还是以69票对26票在众议院获得通过。该法案目前正在西弗吉尼亚州参议院进行进一步审议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reframing the ED's role in behavioral health crises Georgia becomes first state to link arts, mental health Lawsuit: City's police response to MH crises violates federal law Study: Climate change may fuel massive MH burden nationwide In Case You Haven't Heard…
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1