Oral and parenteral vaccination of broiler chickens with Recombinant NetB antigen from Clostridium perfringens confers significant protection against necrotic enteritis.

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES BMC Veterinary Research Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1186/s12917-025-04624-z
Mohammad Ali Shamshirgaran, Mehdi Golchin
{"title":"Oral and parenteral vaccination of broiler chickens with Recombinant NetB antigen from Clostridium perfringens confers significant protection against necrotic enteritis.","authors":"Mohammad Ali Shamshirgaran, Mehdi Golchin","doi":"10.1186/s12917-025-04624-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Necrotic enteritis is a devastating economic disease caused by Clostridium perfringens in poultry. NetB toxin from C. perfringens type G is the major responsible cause of necrotic enteritis. After the ban on growth-promoting antibiotics, alternative effective intervention approaches such as the vaccination of birds were considered critical to control necrotic enteritis. To date, no commercial vaccines with proven efficacy have been approved against necrotic enteritis. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of the oral and parenteral vaccines based on NetB antigen from C. perfringens to choose the best prime-boosting vaccination strategy against necrotic enteritis. The broiler chickens were orally vaccinated with either previously developed recombinant probiotic bacterium, Lactobacillus casei strain expressing NetB toxoid, followed by a parenteral booster by the purified recombinant NetB toxoid (oral/parenteral), or the recombinant NetB toxoid alone (parenteral-only).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Immunizations of birds with these vaccines elicited strong specific anti-NetB antibody responses and provided significant protection against the infectious challenge. Additionally, the vaccinated birds represented significant mean body weight gains compared with birds in control groups during the experiment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study showed that oral and parenteral vaccines using NetB antigen from C. perfringens could provide significant protection against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens.</p>","PeriodicalId":9041,"journal":{"name":"BMC Veterinary Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04624-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Necrotic enteritis is a devastating economic disease caused by Clostridium perfringens in poultry. NetB toxin from C. perfringens type G is the major responsible cause of necrotic enteritis. After the ban on growth-promoting antibiotics, alternative effective intervention approaches such as the vaccination of birds were considered critical to control necrotic enteritis. To date, no commercial vaccines with proven efficacy have been approved against necrotic enteritis. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of the oral and parenteral vaccines based on NetB antigen from C. perfringens to choose the best prime-boosting vaccination strategy against necrotic enteritis. The broiler chickens were orally vaccinated with either previously developed recombinant probiotic bacterium, Lactobacillus casei strain expressing NetB toxoid, followed by a parenteral booster by the purified recombinant NetB toxoid (oral/parenteral), or the recombinant NetB toxoid alone (parenteral-only).

Results: Immunizations of birds with these vaccines elicited strong specific anti-NetB antibody responses and provided significant protection against the infectious challenge. Additionally, the vaccinated birds represented significant mean body weight gains compared with birds in control groups during the experiment.

Conclusions: The current study showed that oral and parenteral vaccines using NetB antigen from C. perfringens could provide significant protection against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口服和肠外接种产气荚膜梭状芽胞杆菌重组NetB抗原的肉鸡对坏死性肠炎有显著的保护作用。
背景:坏死性肠炎是一种由产气荚膜梭菌引起的家禽毁灭性经济疾病。G型产气荚膜梭菌的NetB毒素是导致坏死性肠炎的主要原因。在禁止使用促进生长的抗生素后,人们认为替代性有效干预方法(如为禽类接种疫苗)对控制坏死性肠炎至关重要。迄今为止,还没有经证实有效的坏死性肠炎商业疫苗获得批准。在本研究中,我们评估了以产气荚膜杆菌 NetB 抗原为基础的口服疫苗和肠外疫苗的效力,以选择预防坏死性肠炎的最佳原体强化免疫策略。肉鸡先口服之前开发的重组益生菌--表达NetB类毒素的干酪乳杆菌菌株,然后再用纯化的重组NetB类毒素进行肠外强化免疫(口服/肠外),或者只用重组NetB类毒素进行肠外强化免疫(仅肠外):结果:用这些疫苗对鸟类进行免疫接种,可引起强烈的特异性抗网状杆菌抗体反应,并在面对传染性挑战时提供显著的保护。此外,与实验期间的对照组相比,接种疫苗的鸟类平均体重显著增加:目前的研究表明,使用产气荚膜杆菌的 NetB 抗原的口服和肠外疫苗可显著预防肉鸡坏死性肠炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Veterinary Research
BMC Veterinary Research VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Veterinary Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.
期刊最新文献
Rehabilitating wild birds of prey following ocular trauma - should foveal assessment include spectral-domain optical coherence tomography? Investigation of gene stability in equine luteal tissue during mid-diestrus phase and early pregnancy - Research Article. Comparison of serological tools for reliable diagnosis of brucellosis circulation in the West-African context. Reproductive efficiency and longevity of gilts and sows in group housing and free-farrowing systems versus traditional crate systems in tropical environments. Analysis and identification of circRNA-regulated ceRNA networks associated with the virulence differences between PRV FA and FB strains.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1