Effectiveness and safety of adjunctive cenobamate in people with focal-onset epilepsy: Interim results after 24-week observational period from the BLESS study.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1111/epi.18357
Simona Lattanzi, Fedele Dono, Giuseppe d'Orsi, Alfredo D'Aniello, Mariangela Panebianco, Paolo Bonanni, Carlo Di Bonaventura, Elisa Montalenti, Antonio Gambardella, Federica Ranzato, Giada Pauletto, Elena Tartara, Angela La Neve, Francesca Bisulli, Giampaolo Vatti, Patrizia Pulitano, Claudio Liguori, Giovanni Assenza, Alfonso Giordano, Pietro Pignatta, Vincenzo Belcastro, Michela Cecconi, Simone Beretta, Chiara Pizzanelli, Marianna Pezzella, Massimo Gangitano, Maurizio Elia, Rosaria Renna, Catello Vollono, Angelo Pascarella, Luciana Tramacere, Giovanni De Maria, Daniela Audenino, Maria Pia Pasolini, Loretta Giuliano, Rosita Galli, Gionata Strigaro, Monica Puligheddu, Angelo Labate, Pietro Penza, Stefano Quadri, David Stokelj, Giovanni Boero, Elisa Fallica, Monica Santo Sabato, Giovanni Falcicchio, Nicoletta Foschi, Michela Procaccini, Valentina Villano, Gabriele Camattari, Fabiano Mele, Barbara Roncari, Giancarlo Di Gennaro
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of adjunctive cenobamate in people with focal-onset epilepsy: Interim results after 24-week observational period from the BLESS study.","authors":"Simona Lattanzi, Fedele Dono, Giuseppe d'Orsi, Alfredo D'Aniello, Mariangela Panebianco, Paolo Bonanni, Carlo Di Bonaventura, Elisa Montalenti, Antonio Gambardella, Federica Ranzato, Giada Pauletto, Elena Tartara, Angela La Neve, Francesca Bisulli, Giampaolo Vatti, Patrizia Pulitano, Claudio Liguori, Giovanni Assenza, Alfonso Giordano, Pietro Pignatta, Vincenzo Belcastro, Michela Cecconi, Simone Beretta, Chiara Pizzanelli, Marianna Pezzella, Massimo Gangitano, Maurizio Elia, Rosaria Renna, Catello Vollono, Angelo Pascarella, Luciana Tramacere, Giovanni De Maria, Daniela Audenino, Maria Pia Pasolini, Loretta Giuliano, Rosita Galli, Gionata Strigaro, Monica Puligheddu, Angelo Labate, Pietro Penza, Stefano Quadri, David Stokelj, Giovanni Boero, Elisa Fallica, Monica Santo Sabato, Giovanni Falcicchio, Nicoletta Foschi, Michela Procaccini, Valentina Villano, Gabriele Camattari, Fabiano Mele, Barbara Roncari, Giancarlo Di Gennaro","doi":"10.1111/epi.18357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cenobamate is an antiseizure medication (ASM) with a dual mechanism of action that was recently approved for the treatment of focal seizures in adults. This analysis aimed to describe the outcomes at 12 and 24 weeks after starting cenobamate therapy in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BLESS [NCT05859854] is an ongoing, observational, retrospective and prospective cohort study to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of adjunctive cenobamate in adults with uncontrolled focal epilepsy. Subgroup analysis was performed in subjects with 2 to 3 previous ASMs (early users) and those with >3 previous ASMs (late users).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The second interim analysis of the BLESS study included 388 participants with a median (interquartile range) age of 43.0 (31.0-54.0) years. They had a median of 6.0 (4.0-9.0) prior ASMs and a median of 7.2 (3.0-20.6) monthly seizures at baseline. The median monthly seizure frequency was reduced by 59.9% (19.2%-87.3%) from baseline to 24 weeks; 229 (59.0%) subjects had a ≥50% seizure frequency reduction, and 44 (11.3%) showed sustained seizure freedom. The proportion of participants taking ≤2 concomitant ASMs increased from 217 (56.5%) at baseline to 239 (65.7%) at 24 weeks. Among the early users (n = 76, 19.6%), the median reduction in monthly seizure frequency at 24 weeks was 78.0% (50.0-97.1%), and 76.3% of subjects had a ≥50% response rate. The frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 5.3% and 23.4% in early and late users. The most frequent ADRs were somnolence, dizziness, and balance disorder; after the occurrence of ADRs, 63.5% of participants maintained the prescribed dose, and 5.2% permanently discontinued treatment.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Cenobamate was effective in reducing seizure frequency in a real-world setting and showed a manageable safety profile. The treatment with cenobamate also reduced the burden of concomitant ASMs in both early and late users.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18357","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cenobamate is an antiseizure medication (ASM) with a dual mechanism of action that was recently approved for the treatment of focal seizures in adults. This analysis aimed to describe the outcomes at 12 and 24 weeks after starting cenobamate therapy in a real-world setting.

Methods: BLESS [NCT05859854] is an ongoing, observational, retrospective and prospective cohort study to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of adjunctive cenobamate in adults with uncontrolled focal epilepsy. Subgroup analysis was performed in subjects with 2 to 3 previous ASMs (early users) and those with >3 previous ASMs (late users).

Results: The second interim analysis of the BLESS study included 388 participants with a median (interquartile range) age of 43.0 (31.0-54.0) years. They had a median of 6.0 (4.0-9.0) prior ASMs and a median of 7.2 (3.0-20.6) monthly seizures at baseline. The median monthly seizure frequency was reduced by 59.9% (19.2%-87.3%) from baseline to 24 weeks; 229 (59.0%) subjects had a ≥50% seizure frequency reduction, and 44 (11.3%) showed sustained seizure freedom. The proportion of participants taking ≤2 concomitant ASMs increased from 217 (56.5%) at baseline to 239 (65.7%) at 24 weeks. Among the early users (n = 76, 19.6%), the median reduction in monthly seizure frequency at 24 weeks was 78.0% (50.0-97.1%), and 76.3% of subjects had a ≥50% response rate. The frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 5.3% and 23.4% in early and late users. The most frequent ADRs were somnolence, dizziness, and balance disorder; after the occurrence of ADRs, 63.5% of participants maintained the prescribed dose, and 5.2% permanently discontinued treatment.

Significance: Cenobamate was effective in reducing seizure frequency in a real-world setting and showed a manageable safety profile. The treatment with cenobamate also reduced the burden of concomitant ASMs in both early and late users.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness and safety of adjunctive cenobamate in people with focal-onset epilepsy: Interim results after 24-week observational period from the BLESS study. ENX-101, a GABAA receptor α2,3,5-selective positive allosteric modulator, displays antiseizure effects in rodent seizure and epilepsy models. Scoping review of single-item global rating scales utilized in epilepsy research: Patterns of use, challenges, and recommendations. Issue Information Epilepsia – March 2025 Announcements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1