ctDNA variations according to treatment intensity in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY British Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1038/s41416-025-02971-0
Adrien Grancher, Ludivine Beaussire-Trouvay, Virginie Vernon, Marie Dutherage, Valérie Blondin, Caroline Elie, Karine Bouhier-Leporrier, Marie-Pierre Galais, Tifenn Clabaut, Anne-Laure Bignon, Aurélie Parzy, Alice Gangloff, Lilian Schwarz, Emilie Lévêque, Jean-Christophe Sabourin, Pierre Michel, Nasrin Vasseur, David Sefrioui, André Gilibert, Frédéric Di Fiore
{"title":"ctDNA variations according to treatment intensity in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer","authors":"Adrien Grancher, Ludivine Beaussire-Trouvay, Virginie Vernon, Marie Dutherage, Valérie Blondin, Caroline Elie, Karine Bouhier-Leporrier, Marie-Pierre Galais, Tifenn Clabaut, Anne-Laure Bignon, Aurélie Parzy, Alice Gangloff, Lilian Schwarz, Emilie Lévêque, Jean-Christophe Sabourin, Pierre Michel, Nasrin Vasseur, David Sefrioui, André Gilibert, Frédéric Di Fiore","doi":"10.1038/s41416-025-02971-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Circulating tumor DNA variations (∆ctDNA) were reported to be associated with treatment efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present study evaluated ∆ctDNA according to first-line treatment intensity. Patients from two prospective ctDNA collections were divided into Group ≤ 2 drugs and Group ≥ 3 drugs. ∆ctDNA were analysed from baseline to cycle 3 or 4 (C3-4) according to three predefined subgroups: ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_ undetectable, ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_ detectable, and ∆ctDNA < 80%. Impact of ∆ctDNA on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed. Pretreatment ctDNA was detected in 129/152 (84.9%) of patients. A ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_undetectable was more frequent in Group ≥ 3 than ≤ 2 drugs (respectively 51.5% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.015). Patients with ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_undetectable had longer survival than other ∆ctDNA subgroups, in Group ≥ 3 drugs (mPFS 11.5 vs 7.8 vs 6.3 months, p = 0.02: mOS 30.2 vs 18.1 vs 16.4 month, p = 0.04) and in Group ≤ 2 drugs (mPFS 8.4 vs 6.0 vs 5.3 months, p = 0.05; mOS 29.6 vs 14.6 vs 14.6 months, p = 0.007). Early ∆ctDNA are associated to treatment intensity in first line mCRC with a significant impact on prognosis.","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":"132 9","pages":"814-821"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-025-02971-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA variations (∆ctDNA) were reported to be associated with treatment efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present study evaluated ∆ctDNA according to first-line treatment intensity. Patients from two prospective ctDNA collections were divided into Group ≤ 2 drugs and Group ≥ 3 drugs. ∆ctDNA were analysed from baseline to cycle 3 or 4 (C3-4) according to three predefined subgroups: ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_ undetectable, ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_ detectable, and ∆ctDNA < 80%. Impact of ∆ctDNA on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed. Pretreatment ctDNA was detected in 129/152 (84.9%) of patients. A ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_undetectable was more frequent in Group ≥ 3 than ≤ 2 drugs (respectively 51.5% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.015). Patients with ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_undetectable had longer survival than other ∆ctDNA subgroups, in Group ≥ 3 drugs (mPFS 11.5 vs 7.8 vs 6.3 months, p = 0.02: mOS 30.2 vs 18.1 vs 16.4 month, p = 0.04) and in Group ≤ 2 drugs (mPFS 8.4 vs 6.0 vs 5.3 months, p = 0.05; mOS 29.6 vs 14.6 vs 14.6 months, p = 0.007). Early ∆ctDNA are associated to treatment intensity in first line mCRC with a significant impact on prognosis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一线转移性结直肠癌治疗强度对ctDNA的影响。
背景:据报道,循环肿瘤DNA变异(∆ctDNA)与转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的治疗效果有关。本研究根据一线治疗强度评估∆ctDNA。方法:两组前瞻性ctDNA采集患者分为≤2药物组和≥3药物组。从基线到第3或第4周期(C3-4),根据三个预定义的亚组分析∆ctDNA:∆ctDNA≥80%_不可检测,∆ctDNA≥80%_可检测,∆ctDNA < 80%。分析∆ctDNA对无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响。结果:152例患者中有129例(84.9%)检测到预处理ctDNA。≥3组A∆ctDNA≥80%_undetectable发生率高于≤2组(分别为51.5% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.015)。≥3种药物组(mPFS 11.5个月vs 7.8个月vs 6.3个月,p = 0.02; mOS 30.2个月vs 18.1个月vs 16.4个月,p = 0.04)和≤2种药物组(mPFS 8.4个月vs 6.0个月vs 5.3个月,p = 0.05;mo29.6 vs 14.6 vs 14.6个月,p = 0.007)。讨论:一线mCRC早期∆ctDNA与治疗强度相关,对预后有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Cancer
British Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Addition of zoledronic acid to consolidation chemotherapy in Ewing sarcoma-EURO EWING 2012 (EE2012): an international, open-label, randomised controlled phase III trial. The impact of social drivers of health on delayed time to breast cancer surgery. Genomic sequencing of multicystic mesothelioma finds cohesin complex mutations associated with disease recurrence in patients referred for cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Investigating PAK inhibition in combination with PD-1 blockade to enhance cytotoxic CD8+ T cell-mediated killing and suppress invasion of ovarian cancer cells. Enhanced nuclear export caused by O-GlcNAcylation of nucleoporins is a potential therapeutic target in mesothelioma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1