Hamid Reza Moein, Brandon Karimian, Thomas W Edwards, Mohamed Seisa, Jarred Kendziorski, Rahul Patel, Madeline Vithya Barnaba Durairaj, Lauren Shelton, Samuel Addo, Claire Rinaldo, Gerald W Mank, Suneel Mohammed
{"title":"Bowel Cleansing Effectiveness of Sulfate-Based Tablet Versus Sulfate-Based Solution for Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Retrospective Noninferiority Study.","authors":"Hamid Reza Moein, Brandon Karimian, Thomas W Edwards, Mohamed Seisa, Jarred Kendziorski, Rahul Patel, Madeline Vithya Barnaba Durairaj, Lauren Shelton, Samuel Addo, Claire Rinaldo, Gerald W Mank, Suneel Mohammed","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-08975-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bowel preparation quality is one of the most important quality measures in colonoscopy. Sulfate-based tablets (Sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, potassium chloride) and sulfate-based solution (sodium, magnesium, potassium sulfate) are commonly used for bowel preparation for colonoscopy. However, there has been no comparison between these two.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the bowel preparation quality and colonoscopy quality metrics between sulfate-based tablet sand solution, both given as a split-dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, cross-sectional study in an outpatient endoscopy suite. Patients who chose sulfate-based tablet or solution were included in this study. Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) was used for measurement of bowel preparation quality. Primary endpoint is defined as adequate bowel preparation (any segment score ≥ 2). Secondary endpoints included total BBPS score, adenoma detection rate (ADR), withdrawal time, and cecal intubation rate. A noninferiority test was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 517 patients were included (161 in sulfate-based tablet and 356 in sulfate-based solution group). Sulfate-based tablet resulted in more adequate bowel preparation as compared to sulfate-based solution (98.1 vs. 93.8%; p = 0.044). Total BBPS score was 7.14 ± 1.03 and 7.04 ± 1.22 in tablet and solution groups, respectively (p = 0.366). ADR (37.2 vs. 40.3%; p = 0.681), cecal intubation rate, and withdrawal time were not statistically different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Split-dose sulfate-based tablet is noninferior to split-dose sulfate-based solution in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy. Sulfate tablets may lead to more adequate bowel preparation as compared to sulfate solution likely due to better tolerance. There was no significant difference in colonoscopy quality metric measures between sulfate-based tablet and solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-08975-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Bowel preparation quality is one of the most important quality measures in colonoscopy. Sulfate-based tablets (Sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, potassium chloride) and sulfate-based solution (sodium, magnesium, potassium sulfate) are commonly used for bowel preparation for colonoscopy. However, there has been no comparison between these two.
Aims: To compare the bowel preparation quality and colonoscopy quality metrics between sulfate-based tablet sand solution, both given as a split-dose.
Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study in an outpatient endoscopy suite. Patients who chose sulfate-based tablet or solution were included in this study. Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) was used for measurement of bowel preparation quality. Primary endpoint is defined as adequate bowel preparation (any segment score ≥ 2). Secondary endpoints included total BBPS score, adenoma detection rate (ADR), withdrawal time, and cecal intubation rate. A noninferiority test was conducted.
Results: A total of 517 patients were included (161 in sulfate-based tablet and 356 in sulfate-based solution group). Sulfate-based tablet resulted in more adequate bowel preparation as compared to sulfate-based solution (98.1 vs. 93.8%; p = 0.044). Total BBPS score was 7.14 ± 1.03 and 7.04 ± 1.22 in tablet and solution groups, respectively (p = 0.366). ADR (37.2 vs. 40.3%; p = 0.681), cecal intubation rate, and withdrawal time were not statistically different between groups.
Conclusions: Split-dose sulfate-based tablet is noninferior to split-dose sulfate-based solution in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy. Sulfate tablets may lead to more adequate bowel preparation as compared to sulfate solution likely due to better tolerance. There was no significant difference in colonoscopy quality metric measures between sulfate-based tablet and solution.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.