Jake Goguen, Jessica Forbes, Garrett R Jackson, Aghdas Movassaghi, Hans Lapica, Howard Routman, Vani J Sabesan
{"title":"Optimal Timing of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures.","authors":"Jake Goguen, Jessica Forbes, Garrett R Jackson, Aghdas Movassaghi, Hans Lapica, Howard Routman, Vani J Sabesan","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has recently emerged as a popular operative management option for complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFx) in the elderly. Although rTSA seemingly provides satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes in patients with complex PHFxs, little is known about the clinical and functional outcomes of patients with delayed rTSA treatment of proximal humerus fractures. The purpose of our study was to compare postoperative clinical outcomes and complications in patients treated with rTSA for acute PHFx versus chronic PHFxs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted to identify all patients who underwent primary rTSA for the treatment of a PHFx from January 2010 to December 2022. Patients were separated into two groups based on the timing from PHFx injury to surgery: 1) acute (<6 weeks from date of injury to rTSA) PHFx group and 2) chronic (≥6 weeks) PHFx group. Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes including range of motion, simple shoulder test (SST), Constant score (Constant), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating scale, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart Score (SAS), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score were recorded and assessed using paired t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one patients (Acute Group = 43 patients, Chronic Group = 18 patients) were analyzed. Patient demographics were comparable between both groups. Patients in the acute group had surgery significantly earlier than those in the chronic group (2.0 weeks vs 49.6 weeks, P <.001). There were no significant differences in range of motion, clinical and functional outcome scores, or complications between the two groups. The overall complication rate was 2%. The only complication occurred in the acute group and was a shoulder dislocation secondary to a fall. No significance in complication rates was found between the two groups (P = .518).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients treated in the acute or chronic setting with an rTSA result in comparable clinical and functional outcomes with minimal complications. Ultimately, patients and surgeons can work together for optimal timing of rTSA for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly without sacrificing improvements in function or patient-reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has recently emerged as a popular operative management option for complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFx) in the elderly. Although rTSA seemingly provides satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes in patients with complex PHFxs, little is known about the clinical and functional outcomes of patients with delayed rTSA treatment of proximal humerus fractures. The purpose of our study was to compare postoperative clinical outcomes and complications in patients treated with rTSA for acute PHFx versus chronic PHFxs.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted to identify all patients who underwent primary rTSA for the treatment of a PHFx from January 2010 to December 2022. Patients were separated into two groups based on the timing from PHFx injury to surgery: 1) acute (<6 weeks from date of injury to rTSA) PHFx group and 2) chronic (≥6 weeks) PHFx group. Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes including range of motion, simple shoulder test (SST), Constant score (Constant), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating scale, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart Score (SAS), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score were recorded and assessed using paired t-test.
Results: Sixty-one patients (Acute Group = 43 patients, Chronic Group = 18 patients) were analyzed. Patient demographics were comparable between both groups. Patients in the acute group had surgery significantly earlier than those in the chronic group (2.0 weeks vs 49.6 weeks, P <.001). There were no significant differences in range of motion, clinical and functional outcome scores, or complications between the two groups. The overall complication rate was 2%. The only complication occurred in the acute group and was a shoulder dislocation secondary to a fall. No significance in complication rates was found between the two groups (P = .518).
Conclusions: Patients treated in the acute or chronic setting with an rTSA result in comparable clinical and functional outcomes with minimal complications. Ultimately, patients and surgeons can work together for optimal timing of rTSA for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly without sacrificing improvements in function or patient-reported outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.