Delays in Tocilizumab Therapy for Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis in the United States.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Journal of Rheumatology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.3899/jrheum.2024-0988
Dominique Feterman Jimenez, Jenna L Thomason, Jean W Liew, Sancia Ferguson, Grant Hughes, Alison M Bays
{"title":"Delays in Tocilizumab Therapy for Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis in the United States.","authors":"Dominique Feterman Jimenez, Jenna L Thomason, Jean W Liew, Sancia Ferguson, Grant Hughes, Alison M Bays","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-0988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite the high risk for permanent vision loss in elderly individuals with giant cell arteritis (GCA), initiation of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ) is often delayed. We used chart review for GCA patients prescribed subcutaneous TCZ to investigate delays in drug initiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 82 patients with GCA at the University of Washington prescribed subcutaneous TCZ between 2017 and 2024. Time from medication request to medication approval/start and cost of TCZ were compared by insurance payor using 1-way ANOVA. Use of copay assistance, prior authorization requirement, drug manufacturer/foundation medication coverage, and switches to intravenous (IV) TCZ were compared by insurance using Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all patients with GCA, the mean time between request and first dose was 43 days; the mean time between request and insurance approval was 17 days, and the mean time between medication approval and medication start was 30 days. Patients with Medicare or Medicare Advantage paid significantly more out-of-pocket for the first month of TCZ ($1399 vs $823, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and had significantly higher rates of copay assistance (<i>P</i> < 0.01) and full coverage of medication by the drug manufacturer or foundation (<i>P</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with GCA experienced significant delays in starting TCZ therapy. In addition, patients on Medicare or Medicare Advantage plans had significantly higher out-of-pocket costs compared to other patients. These delays and costs are excessive for a vulnerable population with a potentially disabling disease. Further research is needed to investigate causes of delays, the high cost of medication, and effects on clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"699-703"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-0988","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite the high risk for permanent vision loss in elderly individuals with giant cell arteritis (GCA), initiation of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ) is often delayed. We used chart review for GCA patients prescribed subcutaneous TCZ to investigate delays in drug initiation.

Methods: We included 82 patients with GCA at the University of Washington prescribed subcutaneous TCZ between 2017 and 2024. Time from medication request to medication approval/start and cost of TCZ were compared by insurance payor using 1-way ANOVA. Use of copay assistance, prior authorization requirement, drug manufacturer/foundation medication coverage, and switches to intravenous (IV) TCZ were compared by insurance using Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact tests.

Results: For all patients with GCA, the mean time between request and first dose was 43 days; the mean time between request and insurance approval was 17 days, and the mean time between medication approval and medication start was 30 days. Patients with Medicare or Medicare Advantage paid significantly more out-of-pocket for the first month of TCZ ($1399 vs $823, P < 0.01) and had significantly higher rates of copay assistance (P < 0.01) and full coverage of medication by the drug manufacturer or foundation (P = 0.04).

Conclusion: Patients with GCA experienced significant delays in starting TCZ therapy. In addition, patients on Medicare or Medicare Advantage plans had significantly higher out-of-pocket costs compared to other patients. These delays and costs are excessive for a vulnerable population with a potentially disabling disease. Further research is needed to investigate causes of delays, the high cost of medication, and effects on clinical outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国巨细胞动脉炎患者Tocilizumab治疗延迟
目的:尽管老年巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)患者永久性视力丧失的风险很高,但皮下注射托西珠单抗(TCZ)的用药时间往往被延迟。我们通过对GCA患者皮下注射TCZ处方的病历回顾,对用药延迟进行了调查:我们纳入了华盛顿大学在2017年至2024年期间开具皮下注射TCZ处方的82名GCA患者。使用单因素方差分析比较了不同保险支付方从申请用药到批准/开始用药的时间以及 TCZ 的费用。使用皮尔逊卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验比较了不同保险的共付额补助、事先授权要求、药品制造商/基金会用药范围以及改用静脉注射(IV)TCZ的情况:对于所有 GCA 患者,从申请到首次用药的平均时间为 43 天;从申请到保险批准的平均时间为 17 天,从批准用药到开始用药的平均时间为 30 天。参加医疗保险或医疗保险优势计划的患者第一个月自付 TCZ 的费用明显更高(1399 美元 vs 823 美元,P < 0.01),获得共付额补助(P < 0.01)和药物制造商或基金会全额承保(P = 0.04)的比例也明显更高:结论:GCA 患者在开始 TCZ 治疗时经历了严重的延迟。此外,与其他患者相比,参加医疗保险或医疗保险优势计划的患者自付费用要高得多。对于患有潜在致残性疾病的易感人群来说,这些延误和费用过高。我们需要进一步研究延误的原因、高昂的用药成本以及对临床结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rheumatology
Journal of Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Earl D. Silverman. The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 41 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
期刊最新文献
Comparing Novel and Legacy Health Assessment Questionnaire Scoring Methods: A Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort Study. Risk of Spondyloarthritis in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Treatment With Biologics or Janus Kinase Inhibitors. The Use of Real-World Data for Studies of Dynamic Disease Processes. Individual and Socioecological Resilience in Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Associations With Patient Characteristics and Psychosocial Patient-Reported Outcomes. Choice of Biologic Immunotherapy for Psoriasis or Psoriatic Arthritis and Its Association With Risk of Major Adverse Cardiac Events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1