An artificial intelligence-informed proof of concept model for an ecological framework of healthy longevity forcing factors in the United States

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Current Problems in Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.103035
Ross Arena PhD, PT , Shuaijie Wang PhD , Nicolaas P. Pronk PhD , Colin Woodard MA, FRGS , Tanvi Bhatt PhD, PT
{"title":"An artificial intelligence-informed proof of concept model for an ecological framework of healthy longevity forcing factors in the United States","authors":"Ross Arena PhD, PT ,&nbsp;Shuaijie Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Nicolaas P. Pronk PhD ,&nbsp;Colin Woodard MA, FRGS ,&nbsp;Tanvi Bhatt PhD, PT","doi":"10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.103035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors are a doorway to downstream health consequences characterized by the following: 1) poor quality of life and diminished mobility; 2) increased likelihood of chronic disease risk factors and diagnoses; and, ultimately, 3) a shorter lifespan and healthspan. The aim of the current study is to assess if an ecological framework can predict U.S. lifespan via the use of artificial intelligence. The current study utilized several U.S. county-level datasets representing the predictive variables of the ecologic framework. A non-linear artificial intelligence statistical approach was used to assess the ability of these variables to predict life expectancy, death rate, and years of life lost. The R² values demonstrated that the performance of Extra trees models was different across the three outcomes, however, death rate always exhibited the highest R² for each feature number, indicating superior model accuracy for this outcome. Generally, an increase in the number of features led to improved model performance. Variables from all factors included in the proposed ecological framework were retained in the final predictive models. There is a need to understand why individuals/families/community, connected by shared cultural beliefs, decide to make one lifestyle behavior decision over another.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51006,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Cardiology","volume":"50 5","pages":"Article 103035"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014628062500057X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors are a doorway to downstream health consequences characterized by the following: 1) poor quality of life and diminished mobility; 2) increased likelihood of chronic disease risk factors and diagnoses; and, ultimately, 3) a shorter lifespan and healthspan. The aim of the current study is to assess if an ecological framework can predict U.S. lifespan via the use of artificial intelligence. The current study utilized several U.S. county-level datasets representing the predictive variables of the ecologic framework. A non-linear artificial intelligence statistical approach was used to assess the ability of these variables to predict life expectancy, death rate, and years of life lost. The R² values demonstrated that the performance of Extra trees models was different across the three outcomes, however, death rate always exhibited the highest R² for each feature number, indicating superior model accuracy for this outcome. Generally, an increase in the number of features led to improved model performance. Variables from all factors included in the proposed ecological framework were retained in the final predictive models. There is a need to understand why individuals/families/community, connected by shared cultural beliefs, decide to make one lifestyle behavior decision over another.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国健康长寿强迫因素生态框架的人工智能知情概念验证模型。
不健康的生活方式行为是下游健康后果的一个入口,其特征如下:1)生活质量差,活动能力减弱;2)慢性病危险因素和诊断的可能性增加;并最终缩短寿命和健康寿命。当前研究的目的是评估生态框架是否可以通过使用人工智能来预测美国人的寿命。目前的研究利用了几个美国县级数据集,代表了生态框架的预测变量。使用非线性人工智能统计方法来评估这些变量预测预期寿命、死亡率和寿命损失年数的能力。R²值表明Extra trees模型的性能在三个结果之间是不同的,然而,死亡率对于每个特征数总是表现出最高的R²,表明该结果的模型精度更高。通常,特征数量的增加会导致模型性能的提高。在最终的预测模型中保留了包含在拟议生态框架中的所有因素的变量。我们需要理解为什么个人/家庭/社区,在共同的文化信仰的联系下,决定做出一种生活方式的行为决定而不是另一种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Problems in Cardiology
Current Problems in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
392
审稿时长
6 days
期刊介绍: Under the editorial leadership of noted cardiologist Dr. Hector O. Ventura, Current Problems in Cardiology provides focused, comprehensive coverage of important clinical topics in cardiology. Each monthly issues, addresses a selected clinical problem or condition, including pathophysiology, invasive and noninvasive diagnosis, drug therapy, surgical management, and rehabilitation; or explores the clinical applications of a diagnostic modality or a particular category of drugs. Critical commentary from the distinguished editorial board accompanies each monograph, providing readers with additional insights. An extensive bibliography in each issue saves hours of library research.
期刊最新文献
Cardiac rehabilitation in overweight and obese patients: Challenges, strategies, and the role of emerging anti-obesity therapies Correlation across modalities and clinical phenotypes between left Ventricular global longitudinal strain by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance The role of sex and age in response to early post–myocardial infarction cardiac rehabilitation Access to obesity medicine specialists and endocrinologists for the obese population in US counties, is there a rural-urban divide? Recurrent myocardial infarction: In-Hospital mortality, cardiovascular complications, and comorbidity profiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1