An Artificial Intelligence-Informed Proof of Concept Model for an Ecological Framework of Healthy Longevity Forcing Factors in the United States.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Current Problems in Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.103035
Ross Arena, Shuaijie Wang, Nicolaas P Pronk, Colin Woodard, Tanvi Bhatt
{"title":"An Artificial Intelligence-Informed Proof of Concept Model for an Ecological Framework of Healthy Longevity Forcing Factors in the United States.","authors":"Ross Arena, Shuaijie Wang, Nicolaas P Pronk, Colin Woodard, Tanvi Bhatt","doi":"10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.103035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors are a doorway to downstream health consequences characterized by the following: 1) poor quality of life and diminished mobility; 2) increased likelihood of chronic disease risk factors and diagnoses; and, ultimately, 3) a shorter lifespan and healthspan. The aim of the current study is to assess if an ecological framework can predict U.S. lifespan via the use of artificial intelligence. The current study utilized several U.S. county-level datasets representing the predictive variables of the ecologic framework. A non-linear artificial intelligence statistical approach was used to assess the ability of these variables to predict life expectancy, death rate, and years of life lost. The R² values demonstrated that the performance of Extra trees models was different across the three outcomes, however, death rate always exhibited the highest R² for each feature number, indicating superior model accuracy for this outcome. Generally, an increase in the number of features led to improved model performance. Variables from all factors included in the proposed ecological framework were retained in the final predictive models. There is a need to understand why individuals/families/community, connected by shared cultural beliefs, decide to make one lifestyle behavior decision over another.</p>","PeriodicalId":51006,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"103035"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.103035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors are a doorway to downstream health consequences characterized by the following: 1) poor quality of life and diminished mobility; 2) increased likelihood of chronic disease risk factors and diagnoses; and, ultimately, 3) a shorter lifespan and healthspan. The aim of the current study is to assess if an ecological framework can predict U.S. lifespan via the use of artificial intelligence. The current study utilized several U.S. county-level datasets representing the predictive variables of the ecologic framework. A non-linear artificial intelligence statistical approach was used to assess the ability of these variables to predict life expectancy, death rate, and years of life lost. The R² values demonstrated that the performance of Extra trees models was different across the three outcomes, however, death rate always exhibited the highest R² for each feature number, indicating superior model accuracy for this outcome. Generally, an increase in the number of features led to improved model performance. Variables from all factors included in the proposed ecological framework were retained in the final predictive models. There is a need to understand why individuals/families/community, connected by shared cultural beliefs, decide to make one lifestyle behavior decision over another.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Problems in Cardiology
Current Problems in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
392
审稿时长
6 days
期刊介绍: Under the editorial leadership of noted cardiologist Dr. Hector O. Ventura, Current Problems in Cardiology provides focused, comprehensive coverage of important clinical topics in cardiology. Each monthly issues, addresses a selected clinical problem or condition, including pathophysiology, invasive and noninvasive diagnosis, drug therapy, surgical management, and rehabilitation; or explores the clinical applications of a diagnostic modality or a particular category of drugs. Critical commentary from the distinguished editorial board accompanies each monograph, providing readers with additional insights. An extensive bibliography in each issue saves hours of library research.
期刊最新文献
An Artificial Intelligence-Informed Proof of Concept Model for an Ecological Framework of Healthy Longevity Forcing Factors in the United States. Editorial Board Table of Contents Information for Readers Title Page
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1