Usefulness in rehabilitation of the paper Multiple Errands Test to assess executive functions in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar or autism disorders. Results from the REHABase cohort study.

Denis Boucaud-Maitre, Julien Plasse, Isabelle Chéreau-Boudet, Benjamin Gouache, Emilie Legros-Lafarge, Catherine Massoubre, Nathalie Guillard-Bouhet, Frédéric Haesebaert, Nicolas Franck, Guillaume Barbalat
{"title":"Usefulness in rehabilitation of the paper Multiple Errands Test to assess executive functions in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar or autism disorders. Results from the REHABase cohort study.","authors":"Denis Boucaud-Maitre, Julien Plasse, Isabelle Chéreau-Boudet, Benjamin Gouache, Emilie Legros-Lafarge, Catherine Massoubre, Nathalie Guillard-Bouhet, Frédéric Haesebaert, Nicolas Franck, Guillaume Barbalat","doi":"10.1016/j.encep.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neuropsychological tests measuring executive functions are useful for identifying specific cognitive disorders, but they have limits for characterizing executive dysfunction in everyday activities. This study aims to investigate the socio-demographic, clinical, and psychosocial features associated with executive functions in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar, and autism spectrum disorders using a Paper Multiple Errands Test.</p><p><strong>Patients or materials and methods: </strong>A total of 1071 adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, 329 with bipolar spectrum disorder, and 254 with autism spectrum disorder were recruited from the French National Centers of Reference for Psychiatric Rehabilitation (REHABase) cohort between January 2016 and October 2022. Executive function severity was assessed by the multiple errands test. Socio-demographic and clinical data were extracted as well as results from standardized scales for self-stigma, quality of life, well-being, and self-esteem. Data were analyzed using bivariate and Quasi-Poisson regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean number of errors measured by the paper multiple errands test was 3.1±1.9 in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder (n=1071), 2.4±1.8 in bipolar disorder (n=329), and 2.6±1.9 in autism disorder (n=254). Factors significantly associated with the number of errors were (1) age, illness duration, number of hospitalizations, education level, working memory, and insight in patients with schizophrenia; (2) age, illness duration, number of hospitalizations, education level, and working memory in patients with bipolar disorder; and (3) education level and working memory in patients with autism disorder. The number of errors was associated with lower quality of life, well-being and self-esteem, but not self-stigma, in all three disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The predictors of executive dysfunction observed with the paper multiple errands test were similar to those found with other tests of executive function. The paper multiple errands test is associated with essential psychosocial determinants in rehabilitation, particularly quality of life and well-being, and provides a wide range of information about functioning in community living.</p>","PeriodicalId":51042,"journal":{"name":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2025.01.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Neuropsychological tests measuring executive functions are useful for identifying specific cognitive disorders, but they have limits for characterizing executive dysfunction in everyday activities. This study aims to investigate the socio-demographic, clinical, and psychosocial features associated with executive functions in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar, and autism spectrum disorders using a Paper Multiple Errands Test.

Patients or materials and methods: A total of 1071 adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, 329 with bipolar spectrum disorder, and 254 with autism spectrum disorder were recruited from the French National Centers of Reference for Psychiatric Rehabilitation (REHABase) cohort between January 2016 and October 2022. Executive function severity was assessed by the multiple errands test. Socio-demographic and clinical data were extracted as well as results from standardized scales for self-stigma, quality of life, well-being, and self-esteem. Data were analyzed using bivariate and Quasi-Poisson regression model.

Results: The mean number of errors measured by the paper multiple errands test was 3.1±1.9 in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder (n=1071), 2.4±1.8 in bipolar disorder (n=329), and 2.6±1.9 in autism disorder (n=254). Factors significantly associated with the number of errors were (1) age, illness duration, number of hospitalizations, education level, working memory, and insight in patients with schizophrenia; (2) age, illness duration, number of hospitalizations, education level, and working memory in patients with bipolar disorder; and (3) education level and working memory in patients with autism disorder. The number of errors was associated with lower quality of life, well-being and self-esteem, but not self-stigma, in all three disorders.

Conclusion: The predictors of executive dysfunction observed with the paper multiple errands test were similar to those found with other tests of executive function. The paper multiple errands test is associated with essential psychosocial determinants in rehabilitation, particularly quality of life and well-being, and provides a wide range of information about functioning in community living.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在精神分裂症、双相情感障碍或自闭症患者的康复治疗中使用纸质多重任务测试评估执行功能的实用性。REHABase队列研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Une revue française de renommée internationale. - Un comite de rédaction représentant tous les aspects de la prise en charge psychiatrique du patient. - Une sélection rigoureuse d''articles faisant l''objet de plusieurs expertises. - Des travaux d''auteurs et de chercheurs de renommée internationale. - Des indexations dans les grandes bases de données (Current Contents, Excerpta Medica, etc.). - Un facteur d''impact qui témoigne de la grande notoriété de la revue. La tribune des publications originales de haut niveau. - Une très grande diversité des sujets traités, rigoureusement sélectionnés à travers des sommaires dynamiques : - des éditoriaux de médecins référents, - une revue de presse sur les actualités internationales, - des articles originaux pour approfondir vos connaissances, - des mises au point et des cas cliniques pour engager votre réflexion sur les indications et choix possibles au travers de mises en situation clinique, - des dossiers thématiques pour faire le tour d''une question. - L''actualité de l''AFPB : L''Encéphale publie régulièrement des comptes rendus de l''Association française de psychiatrie clinique.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents Affective responses in adults with severe obesity living or not with a mental disorder during two consecutive 6-min walking exercises. Clinical profiles, treatment adherence, and quality of life in patients with severe mental disorders treated with cyamemazine: A real-world observational study. Impact of insomnia: Cultural and societal aspects from a European survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1