Anatomical landmarks allow for accurate tibial component positioning in kinematically aligned mobile bearing medial unicompartimental knee arthroplasty

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104227
Giancarlo Giurazza , Loic Villet , Guillaume Macary , Charles Rivière
{"title":"Anatomical landmarks allow for accurate tibial component positioning in kinematically aligned mobile bearing medial unicompartimental knee arthroplasty","authors":"Giancarlo Giurazza ,&nbsp;Loic Villet ,&nbsp;Guillaume Macary ,&nbsp;Charles Rivière","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The kinematic alignment (KA) technique for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) aims at preserving the native anatomy, laxity, and biomechanics of the medial compartment, ensuring optimal implants interaction throughout the knee’s range of motion. The accuracy of the manual implantation of a medial KA UKA remains unexplored. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of tibial component implantation, using three intra-operative anatomical landmarks—the 'medial wall of the medial femoral condyle' (MWMC), a joint line-inserted 2.5 mm K-wire, and the 'deep MCL line' – with the hypothesis that their use would allow to accurately establish the orientation of the tibial cut in both the frontal and sagittal planes, as well as its thickness.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Operative notes and pre/postoperative radiographs from a cohort of 90 consecutive KA mobile bearing medial UKAs (Oxford®) were retrospectively reviewed. Coronal and sagittal alignment accuracy were assessed by measuring the post-operative ‘Tibial line to Femoral line Angle’ (TFA) and ‘Medial Sagittal Slope Difference’ (MSSD), respectively. Based on these values, cases were divided into inliers (≤±3 °) and outliers (&gt;±3 °). Polyethylene insert thickness, indicative of tibial cut accuracy, was extracted from operative notes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean TFA was −0.2 ° (SD 2.6; range -9 to 6.8), with 87.4% of inliers. The mean MSSD was −0.7 ° (SD 1.9; range −6.6 to 3.7), with 85.1% of inliers. The median insert thickness was 4 mm (range 3 to 6 mm), with 96.7% of cases within 4 ± 1 mm</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The use of straightforward anatomical landmarks - MWMC, K-wire, and deep MCL line - ensure accurate kinematic alignment of the tibial component of a medial UKA</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":"111 4","pages":"Article 104227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187705682500074X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The kinematic alignment (KA) technique for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) aims at preserving the native anatomy, laxity, and biomechanics of the medial compartment, ensuring optimal implants interaction throughout the knee’s range of motion. The accuracy of the manual implantation of a medial KA UKA remains unexplored. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of tibial component implantation, using three intra-operative anatomical landmarks—the 'medial wall of the medial femoral condyle' (MWMC), a joint line-inserted 2.5 mm K-wire, and the 'deep MCL line' – with the hypothesis that their use would allow to accurately establish the orientation of the tibial cut in both the frontal and sagittal planes, as well as its thickness.

Patients and methods

Operative notes and pre/postoperative radiographs from a cohort of 90 consecutive KA mobile bearing medial UKAs (Oxford®) were retrospectively reviewed. Coronal and sagittal alignment accuracy were assessed by measuring the post-operative ‘Tibial line to Femoral line Angle’ (TFA) and ‘Medial Sagittal Slope Difference’ (MSSD), respectively. Based on these values, cases were divided into inliers (≤±3 °) and outliers (>±3 °). Polyethylene insert thickness, indicative of tibial cut accuracy, was extracted from operative notes.

Results

The mean TFA was −0.2 ° (SD 2.6; range -9 to 6.8), with 87.4% of inliers. The mean MSSD was −0.7 ° (SD 1.9; range −6.6 to 3.7), with 85.1% of inliers. The median insert thickness was 4 mm (range 3 to 6 mm), with 96.7% of cases within 4 ± 1 mm

Discussion

The use of straightforward anatomical landmarks - MWMC, K-wire, and deep MCL line - ensure accurate kinematic alignment of the tibial component of a medial UKA

Level of evidence

IV.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在运动学对齐的移动轴承内侧单关节膝关节置换术中,解剖标志可实现胫骨组件的精确定位。
背景:内侧单腔膝关节置换术(UKA)的运动学对齐(KA)技术旨在保留内侧腔室的原始解剖结构、松散性和生物力学,确保在整个膝关节运动范围内最佳的植入物相互作用。手动植入内侧KA - UKA的准确性仍未得到探讨。本回顾性队列研究旨在评估胫骨假体植入的准确性,使用术中三个解剖学标志——“股骨内侧髁内侧壁”(MWMC)、关节线插入2.5 mm k线和“深MCL线”——假设它们的使用可以准确地确定胫骨在正面和矢状面切割的方向及其厚度。患者和方法:回顾性回顾了90例连续KA移动承重内侧uka (Oxford®)的手术记录和术前/术后x线片。冠状面和矢状面对齐精度分别通过测量术后“胫骨线到股骨线角度”(TFA)和“内侧矢状面斜率差”(MSSD)来评估。根据这些值将病例分为内值(≤±3°)和异常值(≤±3°)。聚乙烯插入物厚度,指示胫骨切割精度,从手术记录中提取。结果:TFA平均值为-0.2°(SD 2.6;范围-9至6.8),87.4%为内线。平均MSSD为-0.7°(SD 1.9;范围-6.6 - 3.7),85.1%为内窥镜。中位插入物厚度为4mm(范围为3 - 6mm), 96.7%的病例在4±1mm范围内讨论:使用直接的解剖标志- MWMC, k -丝和深MCL线-确保内侧UKA胫骨部件的精确运动学对齐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
期刊最新文献
Continuous improvement of patient experience in primary hip and knee arthroplasty through periodic satisfaction assessment: A quality improvement study in a private orthopedic hospital. Adoption and Perception of Artificial Intelligence by Corresponding Authors in Orthopaedic Research: A Global Cross-Sectional Study. Arthroscopic arthrolysis with hardware removal versus hardware removal alone after intra-articular distal radius fracture: A prospective comparative study. Evaluation of a new decision tree in acetabular fracture adapted to recent evolutions: a retrospective, monocentric observational study before/after. Computed tomography-based predictors of ulnar-sided complications after distal radius fracture fixation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1