The prevalence of weapon damage: a proportional meta-analysis

IF 2.1 2区 生物学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Animal Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2025.123117
Sarah M. Lane , Erin L. McCullough
{"title":"The prevalence of weapon damage: a proportional meta-analysis","authors":"Sarah M. Lane ,&nbsp;Erin L. McCullough","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2025.123117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Abstract</div><div>Sexually selected weapons are tools that are used in physical fights over mating opportunities. Individuals can face dire fitness consequences if they break their weapon and can no longer fight effectively; however, the costs and consequences of weapon damage have largely been ignored. In this study, the literature was systematically searched to examine the prevalence of weapon damage, and a phylogenetically controlled proportional meta-analysis was conducted to explore factors influencing the patterns of weapon damage across the animal kingdom. A total of 36 suitable studies were identified across 74 species and 13 orders for a total of 82 effect sizes. We found that weapon damage is common across taxa, with an average rate of damage of 9.4% across all observations. We found strong evidence that regenerative ability influences the patterns of weapon damage, with species capable of weapon regeneration exhibiting high prevalence of weapon damage. Herein, we discuss additional factors that may affect the likelihood, costs and consequences of weapon damage, including weapon size, weapon allometry, fighting behaviour and when and to what degree a species can regenerate its weapon. We argue that the risk of weapon damage is an important but underappreciated cost that could affect strategic fighting decisions, providing new insights into the role of weapon damage on the evolution of weapon morphology and contest behaviour within and among species.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50788,"journal":{"name":"Animal Behaviour","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 123117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347225000442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sexually selected weapons are tools that are used in physical fights over mating opportunities. Individuals can face dire fitness consequences if they break their weapon and can no longer fight effectively; however, the costs and consequences of weapon damage have largely been ignored. In this study, the literature was systematically searched to examine the prevalence of weapon damage, and a phylogenetically controlled proportional meta-analysis was conducted to explore factors influencing the patterns of weapon damage across the animal kingdom. A total of 36 suitable studies were identified across 74 species and 13 orders for a total of 82 effect sizes. We found that weapon damage is common across taxa, with an average rate of damage of 9.4% across all observations. We found strong evidence that regenerative ability influences the patterns of weapon damage, with species capable of weapon regeneration exhibiting high prevalence of weapon damage. Herein, we discuss additional factors that may affect the likelihood, costs and consequences of weapon damage, including weapon size, weapon allometry, fighting behaviour and when and to what degree a species can regenerate its weapon. We argue that the risk of weapon damage is an important but underappreciated cost that could affect strategic fighting decisions, providing new insights into the role of weapon damage on the evolution of weapon morphology and contest behaviour within and among species.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
武器伤害的普遍性:比例荟萃分析
摘要性选择武器是为了争取交配机会而进行肢体斗争的工具。如果个体折断了武器,无法再有效地战斗,那么他们将面临可怕的健康后果;然而,武器损害的代价和后果在很大程度上被忽视了。在这项研究中,系统地检索了文献,以检查武器伤害的普遍性,并进行了系统发育控制的比例荟萃分析,以探索动物王国武器伤害模式的影响因素。在74个物种和13目中,共确定了36个合适的研究,共82个效应量。我们发现武器伤害在整个分类群中很常见,在所有观察中平均伤害率为9.4%。我们发现了强有力的证据,再生能力影响武器伤害的模式,具有武器再生能力的物种表现出较高的武器伤害发生率。在此,我们讨论了可能影响武器损伤的可能性、成本和后果的其他因素,包括武器尺寸、武器异速、战斗行为以及一个物种何时以及在多大程度上可以再生其武器。我们认为,武器损伤的风险是一个重要的但被低估的成本,它可能影响战略战斗决策,为武器损伤在武器形态进化和物种内部和物种之间的竞争行为中的作用提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Behaviour
Animal Behaviour 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Growing interest in behavioural biology and the international reputation of Animal Behaviour prompted an expansion to monthly publication in 1989. Animal Behaviour continues to be the journal of choice for biologists, ethologists, psychologists, physiologists, and veterinarians with an interest in the subject.
期刊最新文献
Repeatable differences in male care and sexual conflict resolution during biparental care in a subsocial insect The influence of the relationship between male suckers and female hindlegs on mating in the diving beetle Eretes griseus Hunger affects cleaning, signalling and signal reliability in the cleaner shrimp Ancylomenes pedersoni Social tolerance mediates social learning in wild red-fronted lemurs, Eulemur rufifrons, and ring-tailed lemurs, Lemur catta Orang-utans and chimpanzees cooperate strategically based on the partner’s incentives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1