Revisión de conceptos, prácticas, paradigmas y evidencias en comunicación aumentativa

Marc Coronas Puig-Pallarols
{"title":"Revisión de conceptos, prácticas, paradigmas y evidencias en comunicación aumentativa","authors":"Marc Coronas Puig-Pallarols","doi":"10.1016/j.rlfa.2025.100523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><div>Augmentative communication (AC) is a field that has experienced significant advances in recent decades, although practices and concepts not always aligned with scientific evidence persist. This study aims to review key concepts, emerging paradigms, and the most innovative practices in AC, identifying their strengths and limitations. It also examines the challenges posed by the proliferation of poorly rigorous information and emphasizes the need to implement Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) to enhance the quality of interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A narrative review of recent scientific literature was conducted, complemented by reflections based on professional experience, to analyze relevant concepts, methods, and approaches in AC. The topics reviewed include Assisted Natural Language, Core Vocabularies, Robust Systems, Motor Planning, Presumption of Competence, and Gestalt Language Processing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis shows that some current trends in AC lack solid empirical support, which may affect the quality of interventions. However, evidence-based strategies, such as Assisted Language Modeling, have proven effective in enhancing users’ linguistic development.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings highlight that EBP is essential to ensure ethical and effective interventions. Strengthening professional training and supporting families are recommended as key pillars to optimize AC practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56174,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia","volume":"45 2","pages":"Article 100523"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214460325000117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

Augmentative communication (AC) is a field that has experienced significant advances in recent decades, although practices and concepts not always aligned with scientific evidence persist. This study aims to review key concepts, emerging paradigms, and the most innovative practices in AC, identifying their strengths and limitations. It also examines the challenges posed by the proliferation of poorly rigorous information and emphasizes the need to implement Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) to enhance the quality of interventions.

Materials and methods

A narrative review of recent scientific literature was conducted, complemented by reflections based on professional experience, to analyze relevant concepts, methods, and approaches in AC. The topics reviewed include Assisted Natural Language, Core Vocabularies, Robust Systems, Motor Planning, Presumption of Competence, and Gestalt Language Processing.

Results

The analysis shows that some current trends in AC lack solid empirical support, which may affect the quality of interventions. However, evidence-based strategies, such as Assisted Language Modeling, have proven effective in enhancing users’ linguistic development.

Conclusions

The findings highlight that EBP is essential to ensure ethical and effective interventions. Strengthening professional training and supporting families are recommended as key pillars to optimize AC practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾增强通信中的概念、实践、范式和证据
背景和目的增强型沟通(AC)是近几十年来取得重大进展的一个领域,尽管实践和概念并不总是与科学证据一致。本研究旨在回顾交流中的关键概念、新兴范例和最具创新性的实践,并确定其优势和局限性。它还审查了不严谨的信息泛滥所带来的挑战,并强调需要实施循证实践(EBP)以提高干预措施的质量。材料和方法通过对近期科学文献的叙述性回顾,并结合专业经验进行反思,分析交流中的相关概念、方法和途径。回顾的主题包括辅助自然语言、核心词汇、鲁棒系统、运动规划、能力假设和格式塔语言处理。结果分析表明,目前交流的一些趋势缺乏坚实的实证支持,这可能会影响干预的质量。然而,基于证据的策略,如辅助语言建模,已被证明在促进用户的语言发展方面是有效的。结论EBP是确保干预合乎伦理和有效的必要条件。建议加强专业培训和支持家庭作为优化空调实践的关键支柱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Evaluación on-line de la competencia narrativa en el síndrome de Noonan Dispositivos electrónicos para una comunicación eficaz en niños con trastorno del espectro autista y sus madres: un estudio piloto Formación docente e implementación de comunicación aumentativa y alternativa con comunicadores electrónicos en entornos escolares Effects of the pandemic on the learning process of students from a low socioeconomic level: Comparative and cross-sectional and quantitative study Bilingüismo y funciones ejecutivas. Influencia de la frecuencia de uso de una segunda lengua en la memoria de trabajo en el envejecimiento
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1