Psychometric assessment of the Traditional Chinese Version of patient reported outcome measurement for breast surgery (BREAST-Q) – Reconstruction module

Ting-Yu Chang , Tongyao Wang , Chia-Chin Lin
{"title":"Psychometric assessment of the Traditional Chinese Version of patient reported outcome measurement for breast surgery (BREAST-Q) – Reconstruction module","authors":"Ting-Yu Chang ,&nbsp;Tongyao Wang ,&nbsp;Chia-Chin Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.ymecc.2025.100015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><div>Patient-reported outcomes, as important indicators of quality of life, was utilized in a widely used breast surgery measurement (BREAST-Q) for assessing patient's physical, psychosocial wellbeing and satisfaction. However, the lack of a Traditional Chinese version has limited its use in patient management in Taiwan. The study aims to psychometrically evaluate the Traditional Chinese BREAST-Q reconstruction module for Taiwanese patients undergoing breast cancer related reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forward and backward translations of the BREAST-Q was followed by expert reviews and pilot testing. Patients undergoing silicon breast reconstruction surgery were recruited from the inpatient and outpatient clinic at a comprehensive medical center. 155 and 96 participants completed the BREAST-Q and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Breast (FACT-B) before and after surgery, respectively. Psychometric properties were analyzed with internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content, construct and criterion validity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The translated BREAST-Q reconstruction module had Cronbach's alpha values of 0.87 and 0.92 before and after surgery, respectively. The Pearson r values between the baseline and the two-weeks retest were.85 and.73, indicating high test-retest reliability. Expert validity measured by the Content Validity Index were 0.96 and 0.98. Concurrent validity measured by the Pearson correlation coefficients between the BREAST-Q and the FACT-B were.26 and.38, indicating good criterion-related validity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study confirms reliability and clinical validity of the Traditional Chinese BREAST-Q reconstruction module in Taiwan for measuring the satisfaction with breasts, overall outcome, process of care, and psychosocial, physical and sexual well-being before and after patients’ breast reconstruction surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100896,"journal":{"name":"Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer Care","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100015"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949877525000036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

Patient-reported outcomes, as important indicators of quality of life, was utilized in a widely used breast surgery measurement (BREAST-Q) for assessing patient's physical, psychosocial wellbeing and satisfaction. However, the lack of a Traditional Chinese version has limited its use in patient management in Taiwan. The study aims to psychometrically evaluate the Traditional Chinese BREAST-Q reconstruction module for Taiwanese patients undergoing breast cancer related reconstruction.

Methods

Forward and backward translations of the BREAST-Q was followed by expert reviews and pilot testing. Patients undergoing silicon breast reconstruction surgery were recruited from the inpatient and outpatient clinic at a comprehensive medical center. 155 and 96 participants completed the BREAST-Q and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Breast (FACT-B) before and after surgery, respectively. Psychometric properties were analyzed with internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content, construct and criterion validity.

Results

The translated BREAST-Q reconstruction module had Cronbach's alpha values of 0.87 and 0.92 before and after surgery, respectively. The Pearson r values between the baseline and the two-weeks retest were.85 and.73, indicating high test-retest reliability. Expert validity measured by the Content Validity Index were 0.96 and 0.98. Concurrent validity measured by the Pearson correlation coefficients between the BREAST-Q and the FACT-B were.26 and.38, indicating good criterion-related validity.

Conclusions

This study confirms reliability and clinical validity of the Traditional Chinese BREAST-Q reconstruction module in Taiwan for measuring the satisfaction with breasts, overall outcome, process of care, and psychosocial, physical and sexual well-being before and after patients’ breast reconstruction surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统中文版乳房手术患者报告结果测量(breast - q) -重建模块的心理测量评估
背景与目的患者报告的结果作为生活质量的重要指标,被广泛应用于乳房手术测量(breast - q)中,用于评估患者的身体、心理健康和满意度。然而,由于缺乏繁体中文版本,限制了其在台湾患者管理中的使用。本研究旨在以心理测量学方法评估传统中式breast - q重建模组对台湾乳癌相关重建病患的影响。方法采用专家评审和试点测试的方法对BREAST-Q进行前后翻译。接受硅乳房重建手术的患者来自综合医疗中心的住院和门诊。155名和96名参与者分别在手术前后完成了BREAST-Q和Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B)功能评估。从内部一致性、重测信度、内容、结构和效度等方面分析心理测量的性质。结果翻译后的BREAST-Q重建模块术前和术后的Cronbach’s alpha值分别为0.87和0.92。基线和两周复测之间的Pearson r值为。85年,。73,表示重测信度高。内容效度指数测量的专家效度分别为0.96和0.98。用Pearson相关系数测量BREAST-Q和FACT-B的并发效度。26和。38,表明良好的标准相关效度。结论本研究验证了台湾地区传统breast - q乳房再造模组在乳房再造术前、术后对乳房的满意度、整体效果、护理过程、心理、生理及性方面的信度及临床效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality criteria for paediatric oncology centres in Switzerland: A multistakeholder consensus finding process Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of Templer’s death anxiety scale using item response theory Performance of Subjective Global Nutrition Assessment (SGNA) in predicting nutritional status among children with cancer: A cross-sectional study Prospective psychometric validation of the swahili translated and adapted Pediatric Patient Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (Ped-PRO-CTCAE) Assessing needs at the workplace: The development of a questionnaire for oncology professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1