Current State of Simulation in Interventional Cardiology Training: Results of a SCAI Survey

Kwan S. Lee MD , Andrew J. Klein MD , Rory S. Bricker MD , Arash Salavitabar MD , Nkechinyere N. Ijioma MD , Julia H. Indik MD, PhD , Sasanka N. Jayasuriya MD , F. David Fortuin MD , Abdulla A. Damluji MD, PhD, MBA , Emmanouil S. Brilakis MD, PhD , Dmitriy N. Feldman MD , Timothy D. Henry MD , John C. Messenger MD
{"title":"Current State of Simulation in Interventional Cardiology Training: Results of a SCAI Survey","authors":"Kwan S. Lee MD ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Klein MD ,&nbsp;Rory S. Bricker MD ,&nbsp;Arash Salavitabar MD ,&nbsp;Nkechinyere N. Ijioma MD ,&nbsp;Julia H. Indik MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sasanka N. Jayasuriya MD ,&nbsp;F. David Fortuin MD ,&nbsp;Abdulla A. Damluji MD, PhD, MBA ,&nbsp;Emmanouil S. Brilakis MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Dmitriy N. Feldman MD ,&nbsp;Timothy D. Henry MD ,&nbsp;John C. Messenger MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2025.102566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Interventional cardiology (IC) is well suited to simulation education, with a wide spectrum of digital and physical models for procedural training. Despite this, standardization, validation, and access to simulation training remains inconsistent in the United States and globally. Ten years have elapsed since the last Society for Cardiovascular Angiography &amp; Interventions (SCAI) expert consensus statement on simulation in IC, which included a survey of US program directors. In this document, we report the results of a follow-up survey with the goal of broadening polling to all career stages, both in the US and internationally.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A web-based 19-item survey with embedded subquestions was sent out via email solicitation to SCAI members from September 2023 to December 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 420 responses were collected, with a 15% response rate. Nearly 70% of respondents were from the US. There was equal distribution in responses for all stages of training, with most respondents performing coronary procedures. Two-thirds had previous exposure to simulation training with most using digital simulators and reporting only 1 to 2 days of exposure for each type or procedure. A majority (71%) felt that they had insufficient simulation training; most felt that simulation fidelity was average. The biggest barrier to simulation training was a lack of access.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite efforts to develop simulation in IC training, there remain gaps in accessibility, exposure, and curricula. Professional organizations, industry, and educational governing bodies must collaborate on specific, actionable strategies to enhance access to high-fidelity IC simulation training globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 102566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930325000079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Interventional cardiology (IC) is well suited to simulation education, with a wide spectrum of digital and physical models for procedural training. Despite this, standardization, validation, and access to simulation training remains inconsistent in the United States and globally. Ten years have elapsed since the last Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) expert consensus statement on simulation in IC, which included a survey of US program directors. In this document, we report the results of a follow-up survey with the goal of broadening polling to all career stages, both in the US and internationally.

Methods

A web-based 19-item survey with embedded subquestions was sent out via email solicitation to SCAI members from September 2023 to December 2023.

Results

In total, 420 responses were collected, with a 15% response rate. Nearly 70% of respondents were from the US. There was equal distribution in responses for all stages of training, with most respondents performing coronary procedures. Two-thirds had previous exposure to simulation training with most using digital simulators and reporting only 1 to 2 days of exposure for each type or procedure. A majority (71%) felt that they had insufficient simulation training; most felt that simulation fidelity was average. The biggest barrier to simulation training was a lack of access.

Conclusions

Despite efforts to develop simulation in IC training, there remain gaps in accessibility, exposure, and curricula. Professional organizations, industry, and educational governing bodies must collaborate on specific, actionable strategies to enhance access to high-fidelity IC simulation training globally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介入心脏病学培训中的模拟现状:SCAI 调查结果
背景介入心脏病学(IC)非常适合模拟教育,有各种数字和物理模型可用于手术培训。尽管如此,在美国和全球范围内,模拟培训的标准化、验证和获取途径仍不一致。自从上一次心血管血管造影和介入学会(SCAI)就 IC 中的模拟教学发表专家共识声明(其中包括对美国项目主任的调查)以来,十年已经过去了。在本文中,我们报告了后续调查的结果,目的是将投票范围扩大到美国和国际上的所有职业阶段。方法在 2023 年 9 月至 2023 年 12 月期间,我们通过电子邮件向 SCAI 会员发送了基于网络的 19 项调查,其中包含嵌入式子问题。近 70% 的受访者来自美国。所有培训阶段的受访者分布均衡,大多数受访者从事冠状动脉手术。三分之二的受访者以前接受过模拟训练,其中大多数人使用数字模拟器,并表示每种类型或手术只接受过 1 到 2 天的模拟训练。大多数受访者(71%)认为他们没有接受过足够的模拟训练;大多数受访者认为模拟逼真度一般。结论尽管在集成电路培训中努力发展模拟,但在可及性、接触和课程方面仍存在差距。专业组织、行业和教育管理机构必须合作制定具体可行的战略,在全球范围内提高高保真重症监护模拟培训的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Table of Contents Cover Current State of Simulation in Interventional Cardiology Training: Results of a SCAI Survey Efficacy and Safety of High-Frequency Optical Coherence Tomography (HF-OCT) for Coronary Imaging: A Multicenter Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1