Plant-derived carbon contribution to soil organic carbon accumulation increases with tropical lowland forest restoration

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122608
Yanfei Sun , Zongrui Lai , Meiqiu Yang , Quanchao Wang , Wangang Deng , Wenxing Long
{"title":"Plant-derived carbon contribution to soil organic carbon accumulation increases with tropical lowland forest restoration","authors":"Yanfei Sun ,&nbsp;Zongrui Lai ,&nbsp;Meiqiu Yang ,&nbsp;Quanchao Wang ,&nbsp;Wangang Deng ,&nbsp;Wenxing Long","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Natural restoration of tropical forests is an effective strategy for mitigating global climate change and enhancing ecosystem carbon stocks. Although studies have shown soil organic carbon storage following forest restoration efforts, the responses of organic carbon sources and their stabilisation to these restoration practices remain unclear. In this study, we employed amino sugars and lignin phenols as biomarkers to explore the contributions of microbial necromass and plant lignin components to soil organic carbon across a chronosequence of tropical lowland forest restorations (&lt;30, &gt;40, &gt;70 years and old-growth forests). Following forest restoration, the concentration of amino sugars in soil organic carbon substantially decreased, whereas the concentration of lignin phenols showed no notable change. The contribution of microbially derived carbon to soil organic carbon steadily declined from 55 % to 33 % as forest restoration progressed, while the contribution of plant-derived carbon increased from 2.7 % to 3.4 %. Microbial-derived carbon remained the dominant source of soil organic carbon accumulation, although its proportion in the organic carbon pool decreased during the restoration process. The Mantel test and structural equation models showed that soil nutrient availability (available phosphorus, available nitrogen, and inorganic nitrogen) and microbial biomass nitrogen were the primary variables influencing microbially derived carbon, whereas plant-derived carbon was regulated by plant root biomass and microbial biomass nitrogen. These findings highlight the importance of combining plant lignin and microbial necromass in regulate soil organic carbon accumulation during tropical forest restoration. This study supports the development of effective carbon management strategies for tropical forests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"585 ","pages":"Article 122608"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725001161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural restoration of tropical forests is an effective strategy for mitigating global climate change and enhancing ecosystem carbon stocks. Although studies have shown soil organic carbon storage following forest restoration efforts, the responses of organic carbon sources and their stabilisation to these restoration practices remain unclear. In this study, we employed amino sugars and lignin phenols as biomarkers to explore the contributions of microbial necromass and plant lignin components to soil organic carbon across a chronosequence of tropical lowland forest restorations (<30, >40, >70 years and old-growth forests). Following forest restoration, the concentration of amino sugars in soil organic carbon substantially decreased, whereas the concentration of lignin phenols showed no notable change. The contribution of microbially derived carbon to soil organic carbon steadily declined from 55 % to 33 % as forest restoration progressed, while the contribution of plant-derived carbon increased from 2.7 % to 3.4 %. Microbial-derived carbon remained the dominant source of soil organic carbon accumulation, although its proportion in the organic carbon pool decreased during the restoration process. The Mantel test and structural equation models showed that soil nutrient availability (available phosphorus, available nitrogen, and inorganic nitrogen) and microbial biomass nitrogen were the primary variables influencing microbially derived carbon, whereas plant-derived carbon was regulated by plant root biomass and microbial biomass nitrogen. These findings highlight the importance of combining plant lignin and microbial necromass in regulate soil organic carbon accumulation during tropical forest restoration. This study supports the development of effective carbon management strategies for tropical forests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物源碳对土壤有机碳积累的贡献随着热带低地森林恢复而增加
热带森林自然恢复是缓解全球气候变化和增加生态系统碳储量的有效策略。尽管研究表明森林恢复后土壤有机碳储量增加,但有机碳源及其稳定性对这些恢复措施的响应尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们采用氨基糖和木质素酚作为生物标志物,探讨了热带低地森林恢复(<30, >40, >;70年和原生林)中微生物坏死团和植物木质素成分对土壤有机碳的贡献。森林恢复后,土壤有机碳中氨基糖含量显著降低,而木质素酚类含量变化不显著。随着森林恢复的进行,微生物源碳对土壤有机碳的贡献从55 %稳步下降到33 %,而植物源碳的贡献从2.7 %上升到3.4 %。微生物源碳仍是土壤有机碳积累的主要来源,但其在有机碳库中的比例在恢复过程中有所下降。Mantel检验和结构方程模型表明,土壤养分有效性(速效磷、速效氮和无机氮)和微生物量氮是影响微生物源碳的主要变量,而植物源碳则受植物根生物量和微生物量氮的调控。这些发现强调了植物木质素和微生物坏死团在热带森林恢复过程中调节土壤有机碳积累中的重要作用。这项研究支持制定有效的热带森林碳管理战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on the necessity for an integrated management of the two-spotted oak borer, Agrilus biguttatus, and associated research priorities The phenology of European forests as seen by MODIS Leaf Area Index and GEDI Plant Area Index: Toward an integrated approach Facilitation of underplanted broadleaf trees by pine canopy under Mediterranean conditions depends on thinning intensity and type, not on species drought tolerance Stand density and structural complexity modulate the effects of restorative selective cutting on aboveground carbon stocks Deciphering carbon-water trade-offs between plantations and natural forests in tibet through an ecological spatial network perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1