A comparative analysis of quasi-static indentation and low-velocity impact on the free edges of CFRP composite laminates

IF 12.7 1区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Composites Part B: Engineering Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112395
Nian Li , Jian Du , Rui Liu , Hsiao Mun Lee , Heow Pueh Lee
{"title":"A comparative analysis of quasi-static indentation and low-velocity impact on the free edges of CFRP composite laminates","authors":"Nian Li ,&nbsp;Jian Du ,&nbsp;Rui Liu ,&nbsp;Hsiao Mun Lee ,&nbsp;Heow Pueh Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A comparative study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of using quasi-static indentation for characterizing the dynamic behavior of CFRP laminated composites subjected to free edge-on impact, focusing on both damage resistance and tolerance. Inspection methods, including ultrasonic C-scanning, 3D X-ray CT reconstruction, in-situ DIC measurement, etc., were utilized to examine damage status and mechanical responses induced by quasi-static edge-on indentation, dynamic edge-on impact and subsequent compression. The analysis revealed comparable failure mechanisms underlying the quasi-static and dynamic testing: wedge-shaped debris and bending fracture of the sub-laminates. In compression, local buckling of sub-laminates caused delamination propagation, ultimately resulting in structural collapse due to fiber fracture. Quasi-static testing provided a good approximation of dynamic edge-on force-displacement behavior without force signal oscillations. A compressive strength reduction of approximately 30 %, for barely visible impact damage (BVID) induced by edge-on loading, emphasized the significance of edge-on impact damage tolerance, where the more accessible quasi-static method could be employed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10660,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part B: Engineering","volume":"298 ","pages":"Article 112395"},"PeriodicalIF":12.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part B: Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359836825002872","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A comparative study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of using quasi-static indentation for characterizing the dynamic behavior of CFRP laminated composites subjected to free edge-on impact, focusing on both damage resistance and tolerance. Inspection methods, including ultrasonic C-scanning, 3D X-ray CT reconstruction, in-situ DIC measurement, etc., were utilized to examine damage status and mechanical responses induced by quasi-static edge-on indentation, dynamic edge-on impact and subsequent compression. The analysis revealed comparable failure mechanisms underlying the quasi-static and dynamic testing: wedge-shaped debris and bending fracture of the sub-laminates. In compression, local buckling of sub-laminates caused delamination propagation, ultimately resulting in structural collapse due to fiber fracture. Quasi-static testing provided a good approximation of dynamic edge-on force-displacement behavior without force signal oscillations. A compressive strength reduction of approximately 30 %, for barely visible impact damage (BVID) induced by edge-on loading, emphasized the significance of edge-on impact damage tolerance, where the more accessible quasi-static method could be employed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
准静态压痕和低速冲击对 CFRP 复合材料层压板自由边缘的影响对比分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Composites Part B: Engineering
Composites Part B: Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
24.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
784
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Composites Part B: Engineering is a journal that publishes impactful research of high quality on composite materials. This research is supported by fundamental mechanics and materials science and engineering approaches. The targeted research can cover a wide range of length scales, ranging from nano to micro and meso, and even to the full product and structure level. The journal specifically focuses on engineering applications that involve high performance composites. These applications can range from low volume and high cost to high volume and low cost composite development. The main goal of the journal is to provide a platform for the prompt publication of original and high quality research. The emphasis is on design, development, modeling, validation, and manufacturing of engineering details and concepts. The journal welcomes both basic research papers and proposals for review articles. Authors are encouraged to address challenges across various application areas. These areas include, but are not limited to, aerospace, automotive, and other surface transportation. The journal also covers energy-related applications, with a focus on renewable energy. Other application areas include infrastructure, off-shore and maritime projects, health care technology, and recreational products.
期刊最新文献
SrCO3@PCL/PDA composite scaffold promote osteoporotic bone regeneration through immune regulation Succinic acid-based biodegradable hydrogels drive Bv2 microglial polarization by ATP metabolism A comparative analysis of quasi-static indentation and low-velocity impact on the free edges of CFRP composite laminates Tailoring of crystal size and significant enhancement of physical property, ductility and toughness in in-situ nano kraft lignin/nano-fibrillated cellulose biocomposite Facile method to enhance the optical properties of transparent glass fiber-reinforced epoxy composites by controlling the curing agent content ratio
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1