Predicting compressive strength of concrete using advanced machine learning techniques: a combined dataset approach

Abinash Mandal
{"title":"Predicting compressive strength of concrete using advanced machine learning techniques: a combined dataset approach","authors":"Abinash Mandal","doi":"10.1007/s42107-024-01247-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assessing the compressive strength of concrete is crucial to ensure safety in civil engineering projects. Conventional methods often rely on manual testing and empirical formulae, which can be time-consuming and error-prone, respectively. In this study, the advanced machine learning techniques are employed to predict the strength. The paper explores multiple base models, such as linear regression (including polynomial features up to degree 3), decision trees, support vector machines, and k-nearest neighbors. Hyperparameter tuning is utilized to improve the models and cross-validation is carried out to check any overfitting issues. In addition, artificial neural networks and ensemble learning methods such as voting, stacking, random forest, gradient boosting, and XGBoost are implemented. Two datasets from different sources are utilized in this study. Results indicate that models trained on one dataset do not perform satisfactorily on second dataset and vice-versa, due to covariant shift in the datasets. In fact, this approach implied that rather than relying on advanced machine learning models, linear regression gave approximate results. After combining these datasets, the models were successful in generalizing over wider range of features. The results show that gradient boosting achieved the highest accuracy with an R<sup>2</sup> score of 0.93 and an RMSE of 3.54 for the training data of combined datasets. The paper further delves into finding the lower and upper bound of the predictions with 95% confidence interval using bootstrapping technique. The author recognizes the necessity of diverse datasets to improve model generalization. However, if the models are trained on limited datasets, and inference is to be made on those with different distributions of features than training data, then the prediction interval can be the indication of the confidence of the models. Further for inference on new unseen data, Mahalanobis distance is measured to indicate whether the data is outlier, thus improving the reliability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 3","pages":"1225 - 1241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01247-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing the compressive strength of concrete is crucial to ensure safety in civil engineering projects. Conventional methods often rely on manual testing and empirical formulae, which can be time-consuming and error-prone, respectively. In this study, the advanced machine learning techniques are employed to predict the strength. The paper explores multiple base models, such as linear regression (including polynomial features up to degree 3), decision trees, support vector machines, and k-nearest neighbors. Hyperparameter tuning is utilized to improve the models and cross-validation is carried out to check any overfitting issues. In addition, artificial neural networks and ensemble learning methods such as voting, stacking, random forest, gradient boosting, and XGBoost are implemented. Two datasets from different sources are utilized in this study. Results indicate that models trained on one dataset do not perform satisfactorily on second dataset and vice-versa, due to covariant shift in the datasets. In fact, this approach implied that rather than relying on advanced machine learning models, linear regression gave approximate results. After combining these datasets, the models were successful in generalizing over wider range of features. The results show that gradient boosting achieved the highest accuracy with an R2 score of 0.93 and an RMSE of 3.54 for the training data of combined datasets. The paper further delves into finding the lower and upper bound of the predictions with 95% confidence interval using bootstrapping technique. The author recognizes the necessity of diverse datasets to improve model generalization. However, if the models are trained on limited datasets, and inference is to be made on those with different distributions of features than training data, then the prediction interval can be the indication of the confidence of the models. Further for inference on new unseen data, Mahalanobis distance is measured to indicate whether the data is outlier, thus improving the reliability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用先进的机器学习技术预测混凝土抗压强度:一种组合数据集方法
在土建工程中,混凝土抗压强度评估是保证工程安全的关键。传统的方法通常依赖于人工测试和经验公式,这可能是耗时的和容易出错的。在本研究中,采用先进的机器学习技术来预测强度。本文探讨了多个基本模型,如线性回归(包括高达3度的多项式特征)、决策树、支持向量机和k近邻。利用超参数调整来改进模型,并进行交叉验证以检查任何过拟合问题。此外,还实现了人工神经网络和集成学习方法,如投票、堆叠、随机森林、梯度增强和XGBoost。本研究使用了来自不同来源的两个数据集。结果表明,由于数据集中的协变移位,在一个数据集上训练的模型在第二个数据集上的表现不令人满意,反之亦然。事实上,这种方法意味着线性回归给出了近似的结果,而不是依赖于先进的机器学习模型。结合这些数据集后,模型成功地泛化了更大范围的特征。结果表明,对于组合数据集的训练数据,梯度增强的准确率最高,R2得分为0.93,RMSE为3.54。本文进一步探讨了利用自举技术寻找具有95%置信区间的预测的下界和上界。作者认识到使用不同的数据集来提高模型泛化的必要性。然而,如果模型是在有限的数据集上训练的,并且要对那些与训练数据特征分布不同的数据集进行推理,那么预测区间可以作为模型置信度的表示。进一步对新的未见数据进行推断,通过测量马氏距离来判断数据是否为离群值,从而提高了可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
期刊最新文献
Towards energy-efficient and comfortable housing in Jordan: a machine learning approach to predicting thermal comfort Experimental and theoretical investigation for improving torsional strength of reinforced concrete beams with hybrid fibers Comprehensive assessment of non-destructive techniques for sequester-based carbon mortar under acidic exposure conditions and predicted using an artificial neural network Harnessing machine learning algorithms for benchmarking deterioration prediction in civil infrastructure systems Modified adaptive weight multi-objective mountain gazelle optimizer for construction time-cost trade-off optimization problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1