Reoperative Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatolithiasis Patients With a History of Biliary Surgery: A Cohort Study

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.028
Yuan-Lin Yu MD , Jie Fu MD , Zhi-Wen Feng MD , Wei-Dong Zhang MD , Da-Fei Dai MD , Min-Tuo Wang MD , Yun-Feng Zhou MD, PhD , Xiao-Peng Chen MD, PhD
{"title":"Reoperative Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatolithiasis Patients With a History of Biliary Surgery: A Cohort Study","authors":"Yuan-Lin Yu MD ,&nbsp;Jie Fu MD ,&nbsp;Zhi-Wen Feng MD ,&nbsp;Wei-Dong Zhang MD ,&nbsp;Da-Fei Dai MD ,&nbsp;Min-Tuo Wang MD ,&nbsp;Yun-Feng Zhou MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Xiao-Peng Chen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>It is unclear whether laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis patients with a history of biliary surgery achieves favorable clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of reoperative laparoscopic hepatectomy (rLH).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent anatomical liver resection for hepatolithiasis between 2015 and 2022 were included in the study. The clinical outcomes of rLH were compared with those of reoperative open hepatectomy (rOH) and initial laparoscopic hepatectomy (iLH). To ensure balanced baseline characteristics, propensity score matching was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 311 patients undergoing anatomical hepatectomy combined with biliary exploration for hepatolithiasis were studied, which included 84 rOH, 101 rLH, and 127 iLH. Propensity score matching resulted in 86 patients in both iLH (miLH) and rLH (mrLH) groups. Compared with the miLH group, the mrLH group had a higher conversion rate (14.0% <em>versus</em> 3.5%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), a higher 90-d complication rate (52.3% <em>versus</em> 34.9%, <em>P</em> = 0.035), and a lower stone clearance rate (initial, 76.2% <em>versus</em> 89.9%, <em>P</em> = 0.024; final, 81.0% <em>versus</em> 93.7%, <em>P</em> = 0.021). However, when compared with the rOH group, the rLH group required a lower blood transfusion rate (20.8% <em>versus</em> 39.3%, <em>P</em> = 0.006), a shorter median postoperative hospital stay (8.0 <em>versus</em> 11.0 d, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and a lower stone recurrence rate (4.9% <em>versus</em> 25.8%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), except for a longer median operation duration (300.0 <em>versus</em> 240.0 min, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). No significant differences were found in other clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>rLH is a safe and feasible option for selected patients with hepatolithiasis who have previously undergone biliary surgery, although its overall clinical benefit is inferior to that of iLH. It should be carefully performed by surgeons with rich experience in laparoscopic liver resection in large medical centers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"313 ","pages":"Pages 549-557"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425000873","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

It is unclear whether laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis patients with a history of biliary surgery achieves favorable clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of reoperative laparoscopic hepatectomy (rLH).

Methods

Patients who underwent anatomical liver resection for hepatolithiasis between 2015 and 2022 were included in the study. The clinical outcomes of rLH were compared with those of reoperative open hepatectomy (rOH) and initial laparoscopic hepatectomy (iLH). To ensure balanced baseline characteristics, propensity score matching was performed.

Results

A total of 311 patients undergoing anatomical hepatectomy combined with biliary exploration for hepatolithiasis were studied, which included 84 rOH, 101 rLH, and 127 iLH. Propensity score matching resulted in 86 patients in both iLH (miLH) and rLH (mrLH) groups. Compared with the miLH group, the mrLH group had a higher conversion rate (14.0% versus 3.5%, P < 0.001), a higher 90-d complication rate (52.3% versus 34.9%, P = 0.035), and a lower stone clearance rate (initial, 76.2% versus 89.9%, P = 0.024; final, 81.0% versus 93.7%, P = 0.021). However, when compared with the rOH group, the rLH group required a lower blood transfusion rate (20.8% versus 39.3%, P = 0.006), a shorter median postoperative hospital stay (8.0 versus 11.0 d, P < 0.001), and a lower stone recurrence rate (4.9% versus 25.8%, P < 0.001), except for a longer median operation duration (300.0 versus 240.0 min, P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in other clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

rLH is a safe and feasible option for selected patients with hepatolithiasis who have previously undergone biliary surgery, although its overall clinical benefit is inferior to that of iLH. It should be carefully performed by surgeons with rich experience in laparoscopic liver resection in large medical centers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对有胆道手术史的肝胆管结石患者再次进行腹腔镜肝切除术:队列研究
导言:对于有胆道手术史的肝内胆管结石患者,腹腔镜肝切除术是否能取得良好的临床效果尚不清楚。本研究旨在评价再手术腹腔镜肝切除术(rLH)的安全性和可行性。方法:选取2015 - 2022年间因肝内胆管结石行解剖性肝切除术的患者为研究对象。将rLH与再手术开放肝切除术(rOH)和首次腹腔镜肝切除术(iLH)的临床结果进行比较。为了确保平衡基线特征,进行倾向评分匹配。结果:311例行解剖性肝切除术联合胆道探查治疗肝内胆管结石,其中rOH 84例,rLH 101例,iLH 127例。iLH (miLH)组和rLH (mrLH)组均有86例患者进行倾向评分匹配。与miLH组相比,mrLH组的转换率更高(14.0% vs 3.5%), P结论:rLH对于既往行胆道手术的肝内胆管结石患者是一种安全可行的选择,尽管其总体临床获益不如iLH。在大型医疗中心,应由具有丰富腹腔镜肝切除术经验的外科医生仔细操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
期刊最新文献
Manually Abstracted versus Electronic Health Record Data for Surgical Quality Improvement Textbook Outcome After Gastrectomy is Associated With Improved Survival: An Observational Study Establishing a Mass Casualty Threshold in a Resource-Limited Hospital Setting: A Retrospective Analysis of a Trauma Registry From Malawi A Scoping Review Focused on Cooperative Group Involvement in Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials Resveratrol Suppresses Sepsis-Induced Micro-vascular Hypo-Reactivity Through Rac1-MLCK Pathway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1