Zien Feng MD , Fang Yi MD, PhD , Wenzhi Zhan MD, PhD , Ruchong Chen MD, PhD , Wanjun Wang MD, PhD , Surinder S. Birring MD , Kefang Lai MD, PhD
{"title":"Development and Validation of Cough Hypersensitivity Assessment Test","authors":"Zien Feng MD , Fang Yi MD, PhD , Wenzhi Zhan MD, PhD , Ruchong Chen MD, PhD , Wanjun Wang MD, PhD , Surinder S. Birring MD , Kefang Lai MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cough hypersensitivity is an important clinical and pathophysiologic feature of chronic cough, which involves chemical, mechanical, and thermal stimuli and sensory dysfunction. Currently, there is a need for a comprehensive method to evaluate cough hypersensitivity.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop and validate a questionnaire to assess the degree of cough hypersensitivity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The initial items of the Cough Hypersensitivity Assessment Test (CHAT) were made based on a literature review, experts’ opinions, and clinical practice. Items were reduced after investigation involving patients with chronic cough. Dimensional allocation, internal reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity, responsiveness, and cutoff value were determined in the final stage.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final version of CHAT on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4) includes 18 items consisting of three dimensions: environmental triggers, daily life triggers, and tussive symptoms, with total score ranging from 0 to 72. There was significant difference in CHAT-18 scores between patients and healthy controls (<em>P</em> < .001). Cronbach α for CHAT was 0.832 and intraclass correlation coefficient for CHAT was 0.884. Construct validity was demonstrated with a multitrait-multimethod matrix. There was good responsiveness after treatment. The cutoff value of CHAT was 18 for cough hypersensitivity. There was a mild to moderate correlation between capsaicin cough sensitivity and tussive symptoms and the total score of CHAT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The CHAT comprehensively covers a range of cough triggers and shows robust internal reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness. This may be useful for measuring cough hypersensitivity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"13 5","pages":"Pages 1154-1163"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219825002570","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Cough hypersensitivity is an important clinical and pathophysiologic feature of chronic cough, which involves chemical, mechanical, and thermal stimuli and sensory dysfunction. Currently, there is a need for a comprehensive method to evaluate cough hypersensitivity.
Objective
To develop and validate a questionnaire to assess the degree of cough hypersensitivity.
Methods
The initial items of the Cough Hypersensitivity Assessment Test (CHAT) were made based on a literature review, experts’ opinions, and clinical practice. Items were reduced after investigation involving patients with chronic cough. Dimensional allocation, internal reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity, responsiveness, and cutoff value were determined in the final stage.
Results
The final version of CHAT on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4) includes 18 items consisting of three dimensions: environmental triggers, daily life triggers, and tussive symptoms, with total score ranging from 0 to 72. There was significant difference in CHAT-18 scores between patients and healthy controls (P < .001). Cronbach α for CHAT was 0.832 and intraclass correlation coefficient for CHAT was 0.884. Construct validity was demonstrated with a multitrait-multimethod matrix. There was good responsiveness after treatment. The cutoff value of CHAT was 18 for cough hypersensitivity. There was a mild to moderate correlation between capsaicin cough sensitivity and tussive symptoms and the total score of CHAT.
Conclusions
The CHAT comprehensively covers a range of cough triggers and shows robust internal reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness. This may be useful for measuring cough hypersensitivity.
期刊介绍:
JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases.
This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders.
The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.