Training health and social care professionals in multidisciplinary team working: a document analysis of undergraduate educational requirements.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Interprofessional Care Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1080/13561820.2025.2469298
Victoria Collin, Samantha Meiring, Sara Noden, Susan Barber, Benedict W J Hayhoe
{"title":"Training health and social care professionals in multidisciplinary team working: a document analysis of undergraduate educational requirements.","authors":"Victoria Collin, Samantha Meiring, Sara Noden, Susan Barber, Benedict W J Hayhoe","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2025.2469298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delivery of health and social care in the UK has shifted toward an integrated care approach in which health and social care professionals work together across preexisting healthcare boundaries in interprofessional teams, referred in UK policy as multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs). If integrated working is to be successful, it is essential that all professionals have the necessary skills to work together effectively. We examined the educational requirements relating to MDT working for different health and social care professions as mandated by regulatory or professional bodies in England to determine current standards and how these may vary across professions. Twenty-six documents were searched using keywords related to MDT working for nine professions; Dietetics, Medicine, Midwifery, Nursing, Pharmacy, Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech and Language Therapy and Social Work. Extracts were subjected to content analysis, and categories mapped across professions. Four categories were identified: <i>Interprofessional learning, MDT working, improving patient care</i>, and <i>healthcare policy</i>. Despite areas of consistency (all professions required learning from other professionals) there were some marked differences. A more consistent approach to training our health and social care workforce would better facilitate integrated care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"448-458"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2025.2469298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delivery of health and social care in the UK has shifted toward an integrated care approach in which health and social care professionals work together across preexisting healthcare boundaries in interprofessional teams, referred in UK policy as multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs). If integrated working is to be successful, it is essential that all professionals have the necessary skills to work together effectively. We examined the educational requirements relating to MDT working for different health and social care professions as mandated by regulatory or professional bodies in England to determine current standards and how these may vary across professions. Twenty-six documents were searched using keywords related to MDT working for nine professions; Dietetics, Medicine, Midwifery, Nursing, Pharmacy, Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech and Language Therapy and Social Work. Extracts were subjected to content analysis, and categories mapped across professions. Four categories were identified: Interprofessional learning, MDT working, improving patient care, and healthcare policy. Despite areas of consistency (all professions required learning from other professionals) there were some marked differences. A more consistent approach to training our health and social care workforce would better facilitate integrated care delivery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培养多学科团队合作的卫生和社会护理专业人员:本科教育要求的文献分析。
在联合王国,卫生和社会保健的提供已转向一种综合护理方法,在这种方法中,卫生和社会保健专业人员在跨专业团队中跨越原有的卫生保健界限共同工作,在联合王国政策中称为多学科团队(MDTs)。如果综合工作要取得成功,所有专业人员都必须具备有效合作的必要技能。我们检查了与MDT工作相关的教育要求,这些要求是由英格兰的监管机构或专业机构强制要求的,以确定当前的标准,以及这些标准如何在不同的专业中有所不同。使用与九个职业MDT工作相关的关键词检索了26份文件;营养学、医学、助产学、护理学、药学、物理治疗、职业治疗、言语和语言治疗和社会工作。对摘录进行内容分析,并对不同职业的分类进行映射。确定了四个类别:跨专业学习、MDT工作、改善患者护理和医疗保健政策。尽管有一些领域是一致的(所有职业都需要向其他专业人士学习),但也有一些显著的差异。以更加一致的方式培训我们的卫生和社会保健工作人员,将更好地促进综合保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
A game theoretical framework to identify collaborative behaviour in interactions between allied health and generalist primary care professionals. Cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale-II in Taiwan. The Jefferson scale of attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration: Spanish validation and relationship with empathy and personality traits in medical residents. Pandemic preparedness and response among global healthcare workers using an interprofessional health practice framework: a scoping review protocol. Navigating an interprofessional curriculum: the interprofessional education passport and the quest for an interprofessional identity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1