The assessment of cognitive function and medical fitness to drive in older adults: A qualitative study with general practitioners

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2025.102020
Stefanidis K.B , Summers M.J. , Clark M.
{"title":"The assessment of cognitive function and medical fitness to drive in older adults: A qualitative study with general practitioners","authors":"Stefanidis K.B ,&nbsp;Summers M.J. ,&nbsp;Clark M.","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The increasing ageing population has led to a pressing need to develop standardised measures and guidelines for assessing cognitive fitness to drive. With the onus of annual medical assessments for driving falling on general medical practitioners (GPs) in Australia, there is a need to explore their experiences and opinions regarding such assessments. This qualitative study explored the perceptions, opinions and experiences of GPs regarding the assessment of older drivers, with a particular emphasis on the assessment of cognitive function.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six registered GPs within Australia participated in an anonymous telephone interview. Following a constructivist grounded theory approach, themes were generated using gerunds.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 5 themes were developed from the data: (1) pre-empting: planting the seed and softening the blow, (2) maintaining the doctor-patient relationship and deflecting pressure, (3) satisficing: doing the best we can with imperfect knowledge whilst balancing competing demands, (4) learning from experience versus formal training and (5) seeking standardised procedures and policy guidance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings highlight that medical assessments for driving are complex and challenging for GPs, particularly in terms of screening for cognitive fitness to drive. The need for evidence-based approaches for assessing cognitive fitness to drive, standardised procedures and formal training for cognitive assessments, were emphasised.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 102020"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The increasing ageing population has led to a pressing need to develop standardised measures and guidelines for assessing cognitive fitness to drive. With the onus of annual medical assessments for driving falling on general medical practitioners (GPs) in Australia, there is a need to explore their experiences and opinions regarding such assessments. This qualitative study explored the perceptions, opinions and experiences of GPs regarding the assessment of older drivers, with a particular emphasis on the assessment of cognitive function.

Methods

Six registered GPs within Australia participated in an anonymous telephone interview. Following a constructivist grounded theory approach, themes were generated using gerunds.

Results

A total of 5 themes were developed from the data: (1) pre-empting: planting the seed and softening the blow, (2) maintaining the doctor-patient relationship and deflecting pressure, (3) satisficing: doing the best we can with imperfect knowledge whilst balancing competing demands, (4) learning from experience versus formal training and (5) seeking standardised procedures and policy guidance.

Conclusions

The findings highlight that medical assessments for driving are complex and challenging for GPs, particularly in terms of screening for cognitive fitness to drive. The need for evidence-based approaches for assessing cognitive fitness to drive, standardised procedures and formal training for cognitive assessments, were emphasised.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人驾驶认知功能和医学适应性的评估:一项全科医生的定性研究
日益增长的老龄化人口已经导致迫切需要制定标准化的措施和指导方针,以评估认知健康的驱动。在澳大利亚,每年对驾驶进行医疗评估的责任落在全科医生身上,因此有必要探讨他们对此类评估的经验和意见。本定性研究探讨了全科医生对老年司机评估的看法、意见和经验,特别强调了对认知功能的评估。方法对澳大利亚境内6名注册全科医生进行匿名电话采访。根据建构主义扎根理论,主题是使用动名词生成的。结果从数据中得出5个主题:(1)先发制人:播下种子,减轻打击;(2)维护医患关系,化解压力;(3)满足:在知识不完善的情况下做到最好,平衡竞争需求;(4)从经验中学习与正规培训;(5)寻求规范的程序和政策指导。结论:研究结果表明,对全科医生来说,驾驶的医学评估是复杂和具有挑战性的,特别是在筛查驾驶认知健康方面。会议强调,需要以证据为基础的方法来评估认知适应性,以推动认知评估的标准化程序和正式培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Exploring perceptions of the barrier effect and their associations with travel mode choice and interactions with neighbours in Santiago, Chile Motion sickness in autonomous driving: Environmental, individual, and time effects Understanding neighborhood walkability perceptions and assessment practices by community: Rural, suburban, and urban settings: A cross-sectional study Eye-tracking and visual processing tests for assessing driving ability in individuals with dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A pilot study Pedestrian fatality in global context: Economic growth, urbanization, and the role of inequality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1