Efficacy and safety of daprodustat versus darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of anemia in chronic renal failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of pharmacological sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jphs.2025.03.006
Shuyue Pang , Zhongtian Wang , Yanyan Fu , Xu Huang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of daprodustat versus darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of anemia in chronic renal failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Shuyue Pang ,&nbsp;Zhongtian Wang ,&nbsp;Yanyan Fu ,&nbsp;Xu Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.jphs.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To compare the efficacy and safety of daprodustat (DPD) versus darbepoetin alfa (DBPA) in patients with anemia in chronic renal failure.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DPD and DBPA in anemia were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science from inception to August 1, 2023. The collected data were analyzed using Stata 15.0.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four RCTs involving 7419 patients (3717 in the DPD group and 3702 in the DBPA group) were included in the study. Meta-analysis revealed that there were no significant differences in the change in hemoglobin level [Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = 3.23, 95 % CI (−0.25, 6.70)], transferrin saturation [SMD = −0.07, 95 % CI (−0.31, 0.17)], total iron [SMD = 0.24, 95 % CI (−0.05, 0.53))], and incidence of adverse events [ RR = 1.02, 95 % CI (0.98, 1.06)] between the two groups. However, DPD was superior in lowering ferritin level [SMD = −0.05, 95 % CI (−0.10, −0.01)] and improving total iron-binding capacity [SMD = 0.57, 95 % CI (0.46, 0.68)] than DBPA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>DPD is not inferior to DBPA in the treatment of anemia in chronic renal failure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological sciences","volume":"158 1","pages":"Pages 68-75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1347861325000271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the efficacy and safety of daprodustat (DPD) versus darbepoetin alfa (DBPA) in patients with anemia in chronic renal failure.

Materials and methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DPD and DBPA in anemia were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science from inception to August 1, 2023. The collected data were analyzed using Stata 15.0.

Results

Four RCTs involving 7419 patients (3717 in the DPD group and 3702 in the DBPA group) were included in the study. Meta-analysis revealed that there were no significant differences in the change in hemoglobin level [Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = 3.23, 95 % CI (−0.25, 6.70)], transferrin saturation [SMD = −0.07, 95 % CI (−0.31, 0.17)], total iron [SMD = 0.24, 95 % CI (−0.05, 0.53))], and incidence of adverse events [ RR = 1.02, 95 % CI (0.98, 1.06)] between the two groups. However, DPD was superior in lowering ferritin level [SMD = −0.05, 95 % CI (−0.10, −0.01)] and improving total iron-binding capacity [SMD = 0.57, 95 % CI (0.46, 0.68)] than DBPA.

Conclusions

DPD is not inferior to DBPA in the treatment of anemia in chronic renal failure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
达必达与达贝泊汀治疗慢性肾功能衰竭贫血的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
目的比较达生产司他(DPD)与达贝泊汀(DBPA)治疗慢性肾功能衰竭贫血患者的疗效和安全性。材料与方法从PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science检索至2023年8月1日,DPD和DBPA在贫血中的随机对照试验(RCTs)。收集的数据使用Stata 15.0进行分析。结果共纳入4项随机对照试验,共7419例患者(DPD组3717例,DBPA组3702例)。meta分析显示,两组患者血红蛋白水平[标准化平均差(SMD) = 3.23, 95% CI(- 0.25, 6.70)]、转铁蛋白饱和度[SMD = - 0.07, 95% CI(- 0.31, 0.17)]、总铁[SMD = 0.24, 95% CI(- 0.05, 0.53))]、不良事件发生率[RR = 1.02, 95% CI(0.98, 1.06)]的变化无显著差异。但DPD在降低铁蛋白水平[SMD = - 0.05, 95% CI(- 0.10, - 0.01)]和提高总铁结合能力[SMD = 0.57, 95% CI(0.46, 0.68)]方面优于DBPA。结论sdpd治疗慢性肾功能衰竭贫血的疗效不逊于DBPA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacological Sciences (JPS) is an international open access journal intended for the advancement of pharmacological sciences in the world. The Journal welcomes submissions in all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology, including neuroscience, and biochemical, cellular, and molecular pharmacology for publication as Reviews, Full Papers or Short Communications. Short Communications are short research article intended to provide novel and exciting pharmacological findings. Manuscripts concerning descriptive case reports, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies without pharmacological mechanism and dose-response determinations are not acceptable and will be rejected without peer review. The ethnopharmacological studies are also out of the scope of this journal. Furthermore, JPS does not publish work on the actions of biological extracts unknown chemical composition.
期刊最新文献
Sodium-glucose Co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor dapagliflozin acutely activates cardiomyocyte HIF-1α signaling via succinate, a signaling metabolite Protective effects of a highly water-soluble rutin on cognitive dysfunction in mice Therapeutic effects of fingolimod through sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling in pulmonary arterial hypertension Ferulic acid activates Nrf2/HO-1 signaling axis to ameliorate neuronal Golgi stress by SKP2 Deep learning deciphers behavioral states from muscle activation patterns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1