Liujun Zhu , Qi Cai , Junliang Jin , Shanshui Yuan , Xiaoji Shen , Jeffrey P. Walker
{"title":"Multi-Scale domain adaptation for high-resolution soil moisture retrieval from synthetic aperture radar in data-scarce regions","authors":"Liujun Zhu , Qi Cai , Junliang Jin , Shanshui Yuan , Xiaoji Shen , Jeffrey P. Walker","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Remote sensing of soil moisture plays an important role in advancing various hydrology applications, with Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) being the most promising technique for high-resolution soil moisture estimation. The growing adoption of machine learning methods has further enhanced this field, though their effectiveness heavily relies on the availability and quality of in-situ measurements. A recent study has demonstrated that pretrained models at 9-km resolution, based on the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) soil moisture products, can be transferred to 1-km using fewer in-situ measurements. Despite the success of this cross-resolution framework, its performance in data-scarce regions at high resolutions remains poor. To address this limitation, a multi-scale domain adaption (MSDA) method was proposed for soil moisture retrieval from data-scarce regions at a resolution of 50 m, taking the pretrained 9 km models as the starting points. Two modifications were made: the integration of multi-scale losses at both 9-km and 50-m resolutions, and the application of domain loss to bridge the gap between training and testing datasets. The MSDA was evaluated in both transductive and inductive modes where transductive mode involves adapting the model using a portion of the unlabeled test data, and inductive mode involves generalizing the model to entirely new, unseen data. A total of 66,547 daily averaged soil moisture measurements from 480 stations of 7 networks across the Contiguous United States were used. In the transductive mode, the use of a single training station in the MSDA achieved an R and RMSE of 0.67 and 0.088 m<sup>3</sup>/m<sup>3</sup> respectively, which were improved to 0.81 and 0.071 m<sup>3</sup>/m<sup>3</sup> when using data from 45 training stations. An acceptable R and RMSE of 0.76 and 0.078 m<sup>3</sup>/m<sup>3</sup> was achieved in the inductive mode. The joint use of the two modifications achieved significantly better results (p < 0.01), with a relative improvement of 5.8 – 20.0 %, overall, and a lower risk of performance deterioration in data-scarce scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"657 ","pages":"Article 133073"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425004111","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Remote sensing of soil moisture plays an important role in advancing various hydrology applications, with Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) being the most promising technique for high-resolution soil moisture estimation. The growing adoption of machine learning methods has further enhanced this field, though their effectiveness heavily relies on the availability and quality of in-situ measurements. A recent study has demonstrated that pretrained models at 9-km resolution, based on the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) soil moisture products, can be transferred to 1-km using fewer in-situ measurements. Despite the success of this cross-resolution framework, its performance in data-scarce regions at high resolutions remains poor. To address this limitation, a multi-scale domain adaption (MSDA) method was proposed for soil moisture retrieval from data-scarce regions at a resolution of 50 m, taking the pretrained 9 km models as the starting points. Two modifications were made: the integration of multi-scale losses at both 9-km and 50-m resolutions, and the application of domain loss to bridge the gap between training and testing datasets. The MSDA was evaluated in both transductive and inductive modes where transductive mode involves adapting the model using a portion of the unlabeled test data, and inductive mode involves generalizing the model to entirely new, unseen data. A total of 66,547 daily averaged soil moisture measurements from 480 stations of 7 networks across the Contiguous United States were used. In the transductive mode, the use of a single training station in the MSDA achieved an R and RMSE of 0.67 and 0.088 m3/m3 respectively, which were improved to 0.81 and 0.071 m3/m3 when using data from 45 training stations. An acceptable R and RMSE of 0.76 and 0.078 m3/m3 was achieved in the inductive mode. The joint use of the two modifications achieved significantly better results (p < 0.01), with a relative improvement of 5.8 – 20.0 %, overall, and a lower risk of performance deterioration in data-scarce scenarios.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.