Emotion recognition in individuals with elevated internet addiction scores: An event-related potential study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2025.111982
Dalia Arafat , Jafar Jamal , Anna Sachs , Boris Suchan , Georg Juckel , Patrizia Thoma
{"title":"Emotion recognition in individuals with elevated internet addiction scores: An event-related potential study","authors":"Dalia Arafat ,&nbsp;Jafar Jamal ,&nbsp;Anna Sachs ,&nbsp;Boris Suchan ,&nbsp;Georg Juckel ,&nbsp;Patrizia Thoma","doi":"10.1016/j.pscychresns.2025.111982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current study aims to elucidate the electrophysiological correlates of performance patterns in an emotion recognition task among individuals with higher internet addiction (HIA) scores compared to those with lower internet addiction (LIA) scores. Forty participants, with twenty in the HIA group and twenty in the LIA group, completed an emotion recognition task, involving five facial expressions: anger, fear, disgust, neutral, and sadness. Additionally, cognitive flexibility and working memory were assessed to examine their link to emotion recognition abilities. No significant differences in accuracy or reaction times (RTs) were observed between the groups in the emotion recognition task. However, the HIA group showed reduced P150 amplitudes, but increased N250 amplitudes relative to the LIA group. There was a positive correlation between the RTs and cognitive flexibility, only in the LIA group. Although the groups demonstrated comparable behavioral performance, the stages of stimuli processing differed. The LIA group appeared to process the stimuli more efficiently in the early stage, while the HIA group required greater effort in decoding the stimuli at a later stage. This suggests that the HIA group may rely on over-processing at a later stage due to reduced early processing efficiency, potentially suggesting an early vulnerability marker.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20776,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging","volume":"349 ","pages":"Article 111982"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092549272500037X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study aims to elucidate the electrophysiological correlates of performance patterns in an emotion recognition task among individuals with higher internet addiction (HIA) scores compared to those with lower internet addiction (LIA) scores. Forty participants, with twenty in the HIA group and twenty in the LIA group, completed an emotion recognition task, involving five facial expressions: anger, fear, disgust, neutral, and sadness. Additionally, cognitive flexibility and working memory were assessed to examine their link to emotion recognition abilities. No significant differences in accuracy or reaction times (RTs) were observed between the groups in the emotion recognition task. However, the HIA group showed reduced P150 amplitudes, but increased N250 amplitudes relative to the LIA group. There was a positive correlation between the RTs and cognitive flexibility, only in the LIA group. Although the groups demonstrated comparable behavioral performance, the stages of stimuli processing differed. The LIA group appeared to process the stimuli more efficiently in the early stage, while the HIA group required greater effort in decoding the stimuli at a later stage. This suggests that the HIA group may rely on over-processing at a later stage due to reduced early processing efficiency, potentially suggesting an early vulnerability marker.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高网络成瘾个体的情绪识别:事件相关电位研究
本研究旨在阐明高网络成瘾(HIA)个体与低网络成瘾(LIA)个体在情绪识别任务中的表现模式的电生理相关性。40名参与者,其中20名来自HIA组,20名来自LIA组,完成了一项情绪识别任务,涉及五种面部表情:愤怒、恐惧、厌恶、中性和悲伤。此外,研究人员还评估了认知灵活性和工作记忆与情绪识别能力的关系。在情绪识别任务中,两组之间的准确性和反应时间(RTs)没有显著差异。然而,相对于LIA组,HIA组的P150振幅降低,但N250振幅升高。RTs和认知灵活性之间存在正相关,只有在LIA组。虽然两组表现出相似的行为表现,但刺激处理的阶段不同。LIA组似乎在早期阶段更有效地处理刺激,而HIA组在后期需要更大的努力来解码刺激。这表明HIA组可能在后期依赖于过度处理,因为早期处理效率降低,这可能表明早期存在漏洞标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
22.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Neuroimaging section of Psychiatry Research publishes manuscripts on positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, computerized electroencephalographic topography, regional cerebral blood flow, computed tomography, magnetoencephalography, autoradiography, post-mortem regional analyses, and other imaging techniques. Reports concerning results in psychiatric disorders, dementias, and the effects of behaviorial tasks and pharmacological treatments are featured. We also invite manuscripts on the methods of obtaining images and computer processing of the images themselves. Selected case reports are also published.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility and exploratory outcomes of immersive VR intervention on brain functional networks and clinical symptoms in ADHD children: A pilot study Hybrid optimized focal high-order attention network with descriptor computations for autism spectrum disorder detection in federated learning Neuroimaging insights into anomalous self-experiences: Extending corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia Multimodal deep learning neuroimaging approach to enhance CT-based diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease Causal ordinal connections based characterization of weighted effective brain network for schizophrenia detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1