Belief in a just world fosters the pursuit of eudaimonia and tolerance of pain through future orientation

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113166
Hezhi Chen , Zhijia Zeng
{"title":"Belief in a just world fosters the pursuit of eudaimonia and tolerance of pain through future orientation","authors":"Hezhi Chen ,&nbsp;Zhijia Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pursuing hedonia (the seeking of pleasure and the avoidance of pain) and eudaimonia (a meaningful life) are the two fundamental motives for happiness. Prior research has shown that happiness motives critically affect well-being. However, their antecedents remain unclear. This research investigates whether and how belief in a just world (the perception that the world is fundamentally fair and individuals generally receive what they deserve) affects happiness motives. Both trait (Study 1) and experimentally manipulated (Study 2) belief in a just world positively predicted motives for eudaimonia and negatively predicted motives to avoid painful experiences, but did not affect motives to seek pleasant experiences. Moreover, future orientation, defined as a general tendency to plan for the future and prioritize long-term outcomes, mediated the relationship between belief in a just world and happiness motives (Studies 1–3). Our findings indicate that the endorsement of different approaches to achieving happiness is partly a response to the perceived environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 113166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188692500128X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pursuing hedonia (the seeking of pleasure and the avoidance of pain) and eudaimonia (a meaningful life) are the two fundamental motives for happiness. Prior research has shown that happiness motives critically affect well-being. However, their antecedents remain unclear. This research investigates whether and how belief in a just world (the perception that the world is fundamentally fair and individuals generally receive what they deserve) affects happiness motives. Both trait (Study 1) and experimentally manipulated (Study 2) belief in a just world positively predicted motives for eudaimonia and negatively predicted motives to avoid painful experiences, but did not affect motives to seek pleasant experiences. Moreover, future orientation, defined as a general tendency to plan for the future and prioritize long-term outcomes, mediated the relationship between belief in a just world and happiness motives (Studies 1–3). Our findings indicate that the endorsement of different approaches to achieving happiness is partly a response to the perceived environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对公正世界的信念通过未来导向促进对幸福的追求和对痛苦的容忍
追求享乐(寻求快乐和避免痛苦)和快乐(有意义的生活)是幸福的两个基本动机。先前的研究表明,快乐动机对幸福感有重要影响。然而,他们的来龙去脉仍不清楚。这项研究调查了对公正世界的信念(认为世界基本上是公平的,个人通常得到他们应得的)是否以及如何影响幸福动机。特质(研究1)和实验操纵(研究2)对公正世界的信念都积极预测了快乐的动机,消极预测了避免痛苦经历的动机,但不影响寻求愉快经历的动机。此外,未来取向,定义为计划未来和优先考虑长期结果的一般倾向,调解了公正世界信念与幸福动机之间的关系(研究1-3)。我们的研究结果表明,人们对获得幸福的不同方法的认可,在一定程度上是对感知环境的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Charisma is not just for the bold: Connecting tripartite narcissism and self-reports of charisma aspects Social support and prosocial decisions in times of distress: Helping a single recipient versus multiple recipients Development and validation of the individual and social music listening scale (ISMUS-LI) Proportionality as a predictor of utilitarian sacrifices: Evidence from the Polish MFQ-2 Sensing a rift in reality: Validation of the self-world existential isolation scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1