Appraisal as a weapon of killing: an ecocritical discourse analysis of animal depiction in nature documentary series The Blue Planet

IF 1.1 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Language Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.langsci.2025.101725
Lei Lei
{"title":"Appraisal as a weapon of killing: an ecocritical discourse analysis of animal depiction in nature documentary series The Blue Planet","authors":"Lei Lei","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2025.101725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nature documentaries are generally considered as educational. However, through delicate choices of evaluation language, they can be weapons of provoking and legitimating animal killing. Based on appraisal theory (Martin and White, 2005), this paper delves into different appraisal patterns applied in the popular nature documentary series <em>The Blue Planet</em>, and their functions of representing marine species. The research shows that positive attitudinal resources with a high degree of gradability are frequently employed to amuse the audience and instigate the exploitation of marine resources. The article concludes that appraisal patterns in nature documentaries mainly act as a tool for advertising animal hunting and nature resource exploration, which is inappropriate for environmental education. Corresponding suggestions are provided to improve the narration of wildlife movies so that they can better perform the role of educating the public harmonious ways of interacting with nature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 101725"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000125000208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature documentaries are generally considered as educational. However, through delicate choices of evaluation language, they can be weapons of provoking and legitimating animal killing. Based on appraisal theory (Martin and White, 2005), this paper delves into different appraisal patterns applied in the popular nature documentary series The Blue Planet, and their functions of representing marine species. The research shows that positive attitudinal resources with a high degree of gradability are frequently employed to amuse the audience and instigate the exploitation of marine resources. The article concludes that appraisal patterns in nature documentaries mainly act as a tool for advertising animal hunting and nature resource exploration, which is inappropriate for environmental education. Corresponding suggestions are provided to improve the narration of wildlife movies so that they can better perform the role of educating the public harmonious ways of interacting with nature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价作为杀戮的武器:《蓝色星球》系列自然纪录片中动物描写的生态批评话语分析
自然纪录片通常被认为具有教育意义。然而,通过微妙的评价语言选择,它们可以成为挑衅和合法化动物杀戮的武器。本文以评价理论(Martin and White, 2005)为基础,探讨了热门自然纪录片《蓝色星球》中不同的评价模式及其对海洋物种的代表作用。研究表明,具有高度可分级性的积极态度资源经常被用来娱乐观众和煽动对海洋资源的开发。文章认为,自然纪录片中的评价模式主要是作为宣传动物狩猎和自然资源勘探的工具,不适合环境教育。对野生动物电影的叙事提出了相应的改进建议,使其能够更好地发挥教育公众与自然和谐互动的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language Sciences
Language Sciences Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Language Sciences is a forum for debate, conducted so as to be of interest to the widest possible audience, on conceptual and theoretical issues in the various branches of general linguistics. The journal is also concerned with bringing to linguists attention current thinking about language within disciplines other than linguistics itself; relevant contributions from anthropologists, philosophers, psychologists and sociologists, among others, will be warmly received. In addition, the Editor is particularly keen to encourage the submission of essays on topics in the history and philosophy of language studies, and review articles discussing the import of significant recent works on language and linguistics.
期刊最新文献
A corpus-based study of the Chinese comparative correlative construction yuè X yuè Y ‘The end of civilisation’: Exploring children's eco-narratives through an analysis of visual grammar Editorial Board Reconciling inclusion and accessibility: Solutions for non-binary linguistic strategies in grammatical gender languages Impact of word predictability on metrical alignment in English verse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1