Brigitte Linder , Nicholas Lowe , Mike Armour , Belinda J. Anderson , Lisa Conboy , Lisa Taylor-Swanson , Sandro Graca , Rodney Dutton , Kathleen Lumiere
{"title":"Secondary analyses of Traditional East Asian Medicine (TEAM) case report and clinical registry data on pain: A study protocol","authors":"Brigitte Linder , Nicholas Lowe , Mike Armour , Belinda J. Anderson , Lisa Conboy , Lisa Taylor-Swanson , Sandro Graca , Rodney Dutton , Kathleen Lumiere","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Traditional East Asian Medicine (TEAM) relies heavily on case reports for clinical decision-making. However, methods for analyzing data from multiple case reports are currently underdeveloped. This protocol will outline novel methods for secondary analyses of TEAM case reports and clinical registry data focused on pain to inform practice-based research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We will use a concurrent triangulation mixed methods design to analyze data from 12 case reports and 130 clinical registry records, meeting the requirements of the CARE guidelines and focusing on TEAM treatments for pain. Quantitative analysis will include descriptive statistics, pairwise <em>t</em>-tests, and responder analysis. Qualitative analysis will employ thematic analysis with both deductive and inductive approaches. Data will be standardized using ICPC-2 and ICD-11 Traditional Medicine codes. Key focus areas include practitioner diagnosis, clinical reasoning, patient outcomes, and self-care behaviors.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Anticipated outcomes include refined methodologies for case report and clinical registry data analysis, insights into TEAM clinical practice patterns, and identification of complex system phenomena within TEAM frameworks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This project aims to address research gaps in modelling case data analysis methodologies for TEAM, potentially enhancing the rigor, validity, and applicability of practice-based research, informing clinical trial design, and contributing to better patient-centered care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 102437"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382025000095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Traditional East Asian Medicine (TEAM) relies heavily on case reports for clinical decision-making. However, methods for analyzing data from multiple case reports are currently underdeveloped. This protocol will outline novel methods for secondary analyses of TEAM case reports and clinical registry data focused on pain to inform practice-based research.
Methods
We will use a concurrent triangulation mixed methods design to analyze data from 12 case reports and 130 clinical registry records, meeting the requirements of the CARE guidelines and focusing on TEAM treatments for pain. Quantitative analysis will include descriptive statistics, pairwise t-tests, and responder analysis. Qualitative analysis will employ thematic analysis with both deductive and inductive approaches. Data will be standardized using ICPC-2 and ICD-11 Traditional Medicine codes. Key focus areas include practitioner diagnosis, clinical reasoning, patient outcomes, and self-care behaviors.
Discussion
Anticipated outcomes include refined methodologies for case report and clinical registry data analysis, insights into TEAM clinical practice patterns, and identification of complex system phenomena within TEAM frameworks.
Conclusion
This project aims to address research gaps in modelling case data analysis methodologies for TEAM, potentially enhancing the rigor, validity, and applicability of practice-based research, informing clinical trial design, and contributing to better patient-centered care.
导言传统东亚医学(TEAM)在很大程度上依赖病例报告来进行临床决策。然而,目前对来自多个病例报告的数据进行分析的方法尚不完善。本方案将概述对东亚传统医学病例报告和临床登记数据进行二次分析的新方法,重点关注疼痛,为基于实践的研究提供信息。方法我们将采用并行三角测量混合方法设计,分析来自 12 份病例报告和 130 份临床登记记录的数据,以满足 CARE 指南的要求,并重点关注东亚传统医学对疼痛的治疗。定量分析将包括描述性统计、配对 t 检验和应答者分析。定性分析将采用演绎法和归纳法进行专题分析。数据将使用 ICPC-2 和 ICD-11 传统医学代码进行标准化。讨论预期成果包括完善病例报告和临床登记数据分析方法,深入了解 TEAM 临床实践模式,以及识别 TEAM 框架内的复杂系统现象。结论本项目旨在解决 TEAM 病例数据分析方法建模方面的研究空白,从而可能提高基于实践的研究的严谨性、有效性和适用性,为临床试验设计提供信息,并有助于改善以患者为中心的护理。
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Integrative Medicine (EuJIM) considers manuscripts from a wide range of complementary and integrative health care disciplines, with a particular focus on whole systems approaches, public health, self management and traditional medical systems. The journal strives to connect conventional medicine and evidence based complementary medicine. We encourage submissions reporting research with relevance for integrative clinical practice and interprofessional education.
EuJIM aims to be of interest to both conventional and integrative audiences, including healthcare practitioners, researchers, health care organisations, educationalists, and all those who seek objective and critical information on integrative medicine. To achieve this aim EuJIM provides an innovative international and interdisciplinary platform linking researchers and clinicians.
The journal focuses primarily on original research articles including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, other clinical studies, qualitative, observational and epidemiological studies. In addition we welcome short reviews, opinion articles and contributions relating to health services and policy, health economics and psychology.