Two interconnected stages in the formation of the Tamazeght magmatic complex (Moroccan central High Atlas) determined by apatite, zircon and titanite U-Pb geochronology
Jamal Achmani , Thomas Blaise , Ilham Chraibi , Jocelyn Barbarand , Nathan Cogné
{"title":"Two interconnected stages in the formation of the Tamazeght magmatic complex (Moroccan central High Atlas) determined by apatite, zircon and titanite U-Pb geochronology","authors":"Jamal Achmani , Thomas Blaise , Ilham Chraibi , Jocelyn Barbarand , Nathan Cogné","doi":"10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2025.105623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The intraplate magmatic complex of Tamazeght (or Tamazert), located in the central High Atlas of Morocco, formed during the Eocene in response to N-S oriented compressive shear movements associated with the convergence between Africa and Europe. The ages of emplacement of certain rocks forming this complex have been determined so far using K-Ar radiometric dating on biotite (from carbonatites and monzonites) and K-feldspar (from nephelinite dykes), as well as Rb-Sr geochronology on whole rock (nepheline monzodiorite). Furthermore, U-Pb geochronology has so far only been applied to eudialytes in the syenites and zircon in the monzonite and late-stage vein. However, uncertainties remain regarding the timing of emplacement of basic cumulates, syenites and lamprophyre dykes. In addition, the ages reported in the literature do not allow discussion of the continuous or multistage formation of the Tamazeght complex. In this paper, we use U-Pb geochronology on zircon, apatite and titanite crystals to clarify the sequence of events that formed the Tamazeght complex. Considering previously published and our new data, two interconnected magmatic stages have been identified. The first stage (ca. 47-44 Ma) corresponds to the plutonic rocks of the jacupirangite-ijolite ultrabasic cumulate sequence, whose age was previously undocumented. The second stage (ca. 44-35 Ma) includes more differentiated plutonic units (ca. 44-41 Ma), as defined by two U-Pb ages obtained from syenite zircons that agree with previous ages. A lamprophyre dyke located south of the complex gave a U-Pb age of 42.2 ± 1.9 Ma on titanite and can be attributed to the vein phase (ca. 43-35 Ma) of this second magmatic stage. This phase involves the intrusion and/or extrusion of several carbonatite, lamprophyre, and phonolite dykes. The Tamazeght magmatic activity is characterized by its short duration, from the early Lutetian to the early Priabonian (ca. 10 My), in relation to the regional geodynamic processes of the first Atlasic phase during the Alpine orogeny.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14874,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Earth Sciences","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 105623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464343X25000901","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The intraplate magmatic complex of Tamazeght (or Tamazert), located in the central High Atlas of Morocco, formed during the Eocene in response to N-S oriented compressive shear movements associated with the convergence between Africa and Europe. The ages of emplacement of certain rocks forming this complex have been determined so far using K-Ar radiometric dating on biotite (from carbonatites and monzonites) and K-feldspar (from nephelinite dykes), as well as Rb-Sr geochronology on whole rock (nepheline monzodiorite). Furthermore, U-Pb geochronology has so far only been applied to eudialytes in the syenites and zircon in the monzonite and late-stage vein. However, uncertainties remain regarding the timing of emplacement of basic cumulates, syenites and lamprophyre dykes. In addition, the ages reported in the literature do not allow discussion of the continuous or multistage formation of the Tamazeght complex. In this paper, we use U-Pb geochronology on zircon, apatite and titanite crystals to clarify the sequence of events that formed the Tamazeght complex. Considering previously published and our new data, two interconnected magmatic stages have been identified. The first stage (ca. 47-44 Ma) corresponds to the plutonic rocks of the jacupirangite-ijolite ultrabasic cumulate sequence, whose age was previously undocumented. The second stage (ca. 44-35 Ma) includes more differentiated plutonic units (ca. 44-41 Ma), as defined by two U-Pb ages obtained from syenite zircons that agree with previous ages. A lamprophyre dyke located south of the complex gave a U-Pb age of 42.2 ± 1.9 Ma on titanite and can be attributed to the vein phase (ca. 43-35 Ma) of this second magmatic stage. This phase involves the intrusion and/or extrusion of several carbonatite, lamprophyre, and phonolite dykes. The Tamazeght magmatic activity is characterized by its short duration, from the early Lutetian to the early Priabonian (ca. 10 My), in relation to the regional geodynamic processes of the first Atlasic phase during the Alpine orogeny.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of African Earth Sciences sees itself as the prime geological journal for all aspects of the Earth Sciences about the African plate. Papers dealing with peripheral areas are welcome if they demonstrate a tight link with Africa.
The Journal publishes high quality, peer-reviewed scientific papers. It is devoted primarily to research papers but short communications relating to new developments of broad interest, reviews and book reviews will also be considered. Papers must have international appeal and should present work of more regional than local significance and dealing with well identified and justified scientific questions. Specialised technical papers, analytical or exploration reports must be avoided. Papers on applied geology should preferably be linked to such core disciplines and must be addressed to a more general geoscientific audience.