Influence of wall thickness on the seismic performance of thin-walled precast UHPC hollow piers

IF 6.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Thin-Walled Structures Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.tws.2025.113205
Xu Wang , Zhao Liu , Jesús-Miguel Bairán , Wenshan Li
{"title":"Influence of wall thickness on the seismic performance of thin-walled precast UHPC hollow piers","authors":"Xu Wang ,&nbsp;Zhao Liu ,&nbsp;Jesús-Miguel Bairán ,&nbsp;Wenshan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.tws.2025.113205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conventional precast piers made of normal concrete (NC) typically feature a solid section, which may hinder hoisting and transportation during construction. Given the superior properties of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC), replacing the NC solid section with a UHPC hollow section presents a viable alternative. However, the seismic performance of thin-walled piers will be different from the solid piers. Current research on the seismic performance of hollow piers primarily focuses on cast-in-place (CIP) piers made of normal concrete, which generally have thick walls and a hollow ratio &lt;0.4. The exceptional mechanical properties and fluidity of UHPC make it feasible to reduce wall thickness in hollow piers. Nevertheless, studies specifically investigating the seismic performance of UHPC hollow piers remain limited. This study presents an experimental investigation of four precast piers with varying wall thicknesses—three made of UHPC and one made of NC as a reference. Quasi-static tests were conducted and the hysteretic responses, energy dissipation, residual displacement, and curvature distribution were discussed. Finally, a refined numerical model was developed on OpenSees platform to accurately replicate the hysteretic and skeleton curves of each specimen. Parametric and time-history analyses were conducted under six strong near-fault ground motions. The results revealed that wall thickness had a limited effect on the strength and residual displacement of UHPC hollow piers, but significantly influenced cumulative energy dissipation and stiffness degradation. The UHPC pier with a hollow ratio of 0.36 exhibited the best strength and displacement responses among all specimens.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49435,"journal":{"name":"Thin-Walled Structures","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 113205"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thin-Walled Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026382312500299X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional precast piers made of normal concrete (NC) typically feature a solid section, which may hinder hoisting and transportation during construction. Given the superior properties of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC), replacing the NC solid section with a UHPC hollow section presents a viable alternative. However, the seismic performance of thin-walled piers will be different from the solid piers. Current research on the seismic performance of hollow piers primarily focuses on cast-in-place (CIP) piers made of normal concrete, which generally have thick walls and a hollow ratio <0.4. The exceptional mechanical properties and fluidity of UHPC make it feasible to reduce wall thickness in hollow piers. Nevertheless, studies specifically investigating the seismic performance of UHPC hollow piers remain limited. This study presents an experimental investigation of four precast piers with varying wall thicknesses—three made of UHPC and one made of NC as a reference. Quasi-static tests were conducted and the hysteretic responses, energy dissipation, residual displacement, and curvature distribution were discussed. Finally, a refined numerical model was developed on OpenSees platform to accurately replicate the hysteretic and skeleton curves of each specimen. Parametric and time-history analyses were conducted under six strong near-fault ground motions. The results revealed that wall thickness had a limited effect on the strength and residual displacement of UHPC hollow piers, but significantly influenced cumulative energy dissipation and stiffness degradation. The UHPC pier with a hollow ratio of 0.36 exhibited the best strength and displacement responses among all specimens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
壁厚对薄壁预制UHPC空心墩抗震性能的影响
由普通混凝土(NC)制成的传统预制墩通常具有实心截面,这可能会妨碍施工过程中的吊装和运输。鉴于超高性能混凝土(UHPC)的优越性能,用UHPC空心截面代替NC实心截面是一种可行的替代方案。然而,薄壁墩的抗震性能会与实心墩有所不同。目前对空心墩抗震性能的研究主要集中在普通混凝土的现浇(CIP)桥墩上,这种桥墩一般壁厚,空心比0.4。UHPC优异的力学性能和流动性使其在空心桥墩中减小壁厚成为可能。然而,专门研究UHPC空心桥墩抗震性能的研究仍然有限。本文对四个不同壁厚的预制墩进行了试验研究,其中三个是UHPC,一个是NC作为参考。进行了准静力试验,讨论了结构的滞回响应、能量耗散、残余位移和曲率分布。最后,在OpenSees平台上建立精细化的数值模型,精确复制每个试件的滞回曲线和骨架曲线。对6次强近断层地震动进行了参数分析和时程分析。结果表明:墙体厚度对UHPC空心墩的强度和残余位移影响有限,但对累积耗能和刚度退化影响显著;当空心比为0.36时,UHPC桥墩的强度和位移响应最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thin-Walled Structures
Thin-Walled Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
20.30%
发文量
801
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Thin-walled structures comprises an important and growing proportion of engineering construction with areas of application becoming increasingly diverse, ranging from aircraft, bridges, ships and oil rigs to storage vessels, industrial buildings and warehouses. Many factors, including cost and weight economy, new materials and processes and the growth of powerful methods of analysis have contributed to this growth, and led to the need for a journal which concentrates specifically on structures in which problems arise due to the thinness of the walls. This field includes cold– formed sections, plate and shell structures, reinforced plastics structures and aluminium structures, and is of importance in many branches of engineering. The primary criterion for consideration of papers in Thin–Walled Structures is that they must be concerned with thin–walled structures or the basic problems inherent in thin–walled structures. Provided this criterion is satisfied no restriction is placed on the type of construction, material or field of application. Papers on theory, experiment, design, etc., are published and it is expected that many papers will contain aspects of all three.
期刊最新文献
Full-field deformation prediction of composite armor under cased-charge explosion: Experimental characterization and CNN-based modeling Artificially designed mechanical metamaterial elastomers enable extended sheet metal formability in flexible-die forming process Topology optimization design of programmable multi-platform quasi-zero stiffness metamaterials for energy absorption An analytical solution for dynamic plastic responses of PVC foam sandwich beams under ice impact Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1