{"title":"Impacts of generative artificial intelligence on the future of labor market: A systematic review","authors":"Nader Salari , Mahan Beiromvand , Amin Hosseinian-Far , Javad Habibi , Fateme Babajani , Masoud Mohammadi","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Generative AI (GenAI) has the ability to autonomously collect and process data to generate contents, inform decisions, solve problems, and perform tasks that typically require human reasoning. This Systematic Review is conducted to examine the impacts of GenAI on the future of employment, focusing on concerns about rising unemployment, and the positive and negative perspectives outlined within exiting studies. The findings from this review can help identify research gaps, guide organizational planning, and improve AI governance frameworks and policies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To identify relevant studies, the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar databases and repositories were systematically searched using the keywords: ‘Future of work’, ‘Job market’, ‘Generative AI’, ‘Generative AI’, and ‘ChatGPT’. Additionally, the reference lists of the identified related articles were reviewed for grey literature.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Following the PRISMA guidelines, a total of 14 articles were selected for analysis. Selected studies have examined the positive and negative viewpoints on GenAI, together with pertinent challenges and opportunities. Accordingly, GenAI, when compliant with security and ethical issues, has the potential to increase efficiency whilst reducing costs and time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Considering the rapid growth and adoption of AI technologies, examining the impacts of GenAI on the future of labor market is crucial. GenAI is likely to create new roles in some sectors yet reduce opportunities in others. A nuanced assessment of the impacts, and ongoing monitoring are vital for effective preparation and adaptation to the evolving work landscape in the presence of advanced AI technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100652"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825000673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Generative AI (GenAI) has the ability to autonomously collect and process data to generate contents, inform decisions, solve problems, and perform tasks that typically require human reasoning. This Systematic Review is conducted to examine the impacts of GenAI on the future of employment, focusing on concerns about rising unemployment, and the positive and negative perspectives outlined within exiting studies. The findings from this review can help identify research gaps, guide organizational planning, and improve AI governance frameworks and policies.
Methods
To identify relevant studies, the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar databases and repositories were systematically searched using the keywords: ‘Future of work’, ‘Job market’, ‘Generative AI’, ‘Generative AI’, and ‘ChatGPT’. Additionally, the reference lists of the identified related articles were reviewed for grey literature.
Results
Following the PRISMA guidelines, a total of 14 articles were selected for analysis. Selected studies have examined the positive and negative viewpoints on GenAI, together with pertinent challenges and opportunities. Accordingly, GenAI, when compliant with security and ethical issues, has the potential to increase efficiency whilst reducing costs and time.
Conclusion
Considering the rapid growth and adoption of AI technologies, examining the impacts of GenAI on the future of labor market is crucial. GenAI is likely to create new roles in some sectors yet reduce opportunities in others. A nuanced assessment of the impacts, and ongoing monitoring are vital for effective preparation and adaptation to the evolving work landscape in the presence of advanced AI technologies.
生成式人工智能(GenAI)具有自主收集和处理数据以生成内容、为决策提供信息、解决问题和执行通常需要人类推理的任务的能力。本系统综述旨在研究GenAI对未来就业的影响,重点关注对失业率上升的担忧,以及现有研究中概述的积极和消极观点。本次审查的结果可以帮助确定研究差距,指导组织规划,并改进人工智能治理框架和政策。方法以“未来工作”、“就业市场”、“生成式人工智能”、“生成式人工智能”和“ChatGPT”为关键词,系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase、ScienceDirect和b谷歌Scholar数据库和知识库,以确定相关研究。此外,对相关文献的参考文献列表进行灰色文献回顾。结果按照PRISMA指南,共选择14篇文章进行分析。选定的研究考察了对GenAI的积极和消极看法,以及相关的挑战和机遇。因此,GenAI在符合安全和道德问题的情况下,有可能提高效率,同时降低成本和时间。考虑到人工智能技术的快速增长和采用,研究GenAI对未来劳动力市场的影响至关重要。基因人工智能可能在某些部门创造新的角色,但在其他部门却减少了机会。在先进人工智能技术存在的情况下,对影响进行细致的评估和持续监测对于有效准备和适应不断变化的工作环境至关重要。