Impacts of generative artificial intelligence on the future of labor market: A systematic review

IF 5.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100652
Nader Salari , Mahan Beiromvand , Amin Hosseinian-Far , Javad Habibi , Fateme Babajani , Masoud Mohammadi
{"title":"Impacts of generative artificial intelligence on the future of labor market: A systematic review","authors":"Nader Salari ,&nbsp;Mahan Beiromvand ,&nbsp;Amin Hosseinian-Far ,&nbsp;Javad Habibi ,&nbsp;Fateme Babajani ,&nbsp;Masoud Mohammadi","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Generative AI (GenAI) has the ability to autonomously collect and process data to generate contents, inform decisions, solve problems, and perform tasks that typically require human reasoning. This Systematic Review is conducted to examine the impacts of GenAI on the future of employment, focusing on concerns about rising unemployment, and the positive and negative perspectives outlined within exiting studies. The findings from this review can help identify research gaps, guide organizational planning, and improve AI governance frameworks and policies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To identify relevant studies, the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar databases and repositories were systematically searched using the keywords: ‘Future of work’, ‘Job market’, ‘Generative AI’, ‘Generative AI’, and ‘ChatGPT’. Additionally, the reference lists of the identified related articles were reviewed for grey literature.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Following the PRISMA guidelines, a total of 14 articles were selected for analysis. Selected studies have examined the positive and negative viewpoints on GenAI, together with pertinent challenges and opportunities. Accordingly, GenAI, when compliant with security and ethical issues, has the potential to increase efficiency whilst reducing costs and time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Considering the rapid growth and adoption of AI technologies, examining the impacts of GenAI on the future of labor market is crucial. GenAI is likely to create new roles in some sectors yet reduce opportunities in others. A nuanced assessment of the impacts, and ongoing monitoring are vital for effective preparation and adaptation to the evolving work landscape in the presence of advanced AI technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100652"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825000673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Generative AI (GenAI) has the ability to autonomously collect and process data to generate contents, inform decisions, solve problems, and perform tasks that typically require human reasoning. This Systematic Review is conducted to examine the impacts of GenAI on the future of employment, focusing on concerns about rising unemployment, and the positive and negative perspectives outlined within exiting studies. The findings from this review can help identify research gaps, guide organizational planning, and improve AI governance frameworks and policies.

Methods

To identify relevant studies, the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar databases and repositories were systematically searched using the keywords: ‘Future of work’, ‘Job market’, ‘Generative AI’, ‘Generative AI’, and ‘ChatGPT’. Additionally, the reference lists of the identified related articles were reviewed for grey literature.

Results

Following the PRISMA guidelines, a total of 14 articles were selected for analysis. Selected studies have examined the positive and negative viewpoints on GenAI, together with pertinent challenges and opportunities. Accordingly, GenAI, when compliant with security and ethical issues, has the potential to increase efficiency whilst reducing costs and time.

Conclusion

Considering the rapid growth and adoption of AI technologies, examining the impacts of GenAI on the future of labor market is crucial. GenAI is likely to create new roles in some sectors yet reduce opportunities in others. A nuanced assessment of the impacts, and ongoing monitoring are vital for effective preparation and adaptation to the evolving work landscape in the presence of advanced AI technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生成式人工智能对未来劳动力市场的影响:系统回顾
生成式人工智能(GenAI)具有自主收集和处理数据以生成内容、为决策提供信息、解决问题和执行通常需要人类推理的任务的能力。本系统综述旨在研究GenAI对未来就业的影响,重点关注对失业率上升的担忧,以及现有研究中概述的积极和消极观点。本次审查的结果可以帮助确定研究差距,指导组织规划,并改进人工智能治理框架和政策。方法以“未来工作”、“就业市场”、“生成式人工智能”、“生成式人工智能”和“ChatGPT”为关键词,系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase、ScienceDirect和b谷歌Scholar数据库和知识库,以确定相关研究。此外,对相关文献的参考文献列表进行灰色文献回顾。结果按照PRISMA指南,共选择14篇文章进行分析。选定的研究考察了对GenAI的积极和消极看法,以及相关的挑战和机遇。因此,GenAI在符合安全和道德问题的情况下,有可能提高效率,同时降低成本和时间。考虑到人工智能技术的快速增长和采用,研究GenAI对未来劳动力市场的影响至关重要。基因人工智能可能在某些部门创造新的角色,但在其他部门却减少了机会。在先进人工智能技术存在的情况下,对影响进行细致的评估和持续监测对于有效准备和适应不断变化的工作环境至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital technologies and artificial intelligence in eating disorders: A scoping review of prevention, screening, and treatment approaches Online shopping addiction, subjective wellbeing, and indebtedness: A psychosocial framework Complex tasks, frustrated minds: Motivational predictors of performance in complex problem solving and dynamic decision making Exploring user experience and emotional response to immersive 360° videos of bullying: opportunities for psychoeducational trainings Maternal screen use and patterns of breastfeeding: A population-based Canadian study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1