From knowledge to intention: The role of TPACK and self-efficacy in technology integration

IF 5.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers and Education Open Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100246
Thomas Schubatzky , Jan-Philipp Burde , Rike Große-Heilmann , Andreas Lachner , Josef Riese , David Weiler
{"title":"From knowledge to intention: The role of TPACK and self-efficacy in technology integration","authors":"Thomas Schubatzky ,&nbsp;Jan-Philipp Burde ,&nbsp;Rike Große-Heilmann ,&nbsp;Andreas Lachner ,&nbsp;Josef Riese ,&nbsp;David Weiler","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Educational technology (ET) is playing an increasingly important role in classrooms and has the potential to support student learning. However, teachers need to implement ET in a purposeful way. A necessary –but insufficient –condition for meaningful implementation of ET is the intention to use it in the first place. This study aims to investigate the predictors of pre-service teachers’ intention to use ET, specifically focusing on how technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) interacts with the constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). While previous research has frequently employed self-reported TPCK to explore these relationships, our study uses a test-based measure to provide a more objective assessment. We also aim to understand how these relationships evolve over time, particularly during a technology integration seminar in teacher education. Using path analysis including N = 146 preservice teachers, we examined the relationships between test-based TPCK, self-efficacy, and the TAM variables (perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and intention to use ET). Our findings indicate that self-efficacy is a strong predictor of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of integration, and intention to use ET, whereas TPCK primarily influences perceived usefulness and indirectly affects intention. Furthermore, we observed that the roles of TPCK and self-efficacy shift over time. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of how objective measures of professional knowledge can reshape interpretations of TAM studies and guide the design of teacher preparation programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100246"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557325000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educational technology (ET) is playing an increasingly important role in classrooms and has the potential to support student learning. However, teachers need to implement ET in a purposeful way. A necessary –but insufficient –condition for meaningful implementation of ET is the intention to use it in the first place. This study aims to investigate the predictors of pre-service teachers’ intention to use ET, specifically focusing on how technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) interacts with the constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). While previous research has frequently employed self-reported TPCK to explore these relationships, our study uses a test-based measure to provide a more objective assessment. We also aim to understand how these relationships evolve over time, particularly during a technology integration seminar in teacher education. Using path analysis including N = 146 preservice teachers, we examined the relationships between test-based TPCK, self-efficacy, and the TAM variables (perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and intention to use ET). Our findings indicate that self-efficacy is a strong predictor of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of integration, and intention to use ET, whereas TPCK primarily influences perceived usefulness and indirectly affects intention. Furthermore, we observed that the roles of TPCK and self-efficacy shift over time. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of how objective measures of professional knowledge can reshape interpretations of TAM studies and guide the design of teacher preparation programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从知识到意向:TPACK与自我效能感在技术整合中的作用
教育技术(ET)在课堂上扮演着越来越重要的角色,并具有支持学生学习的潜力。然而,教师需要以一种有目的的方式实施英语教学。有意义地实施ET的一个必要但不充分的条件是,首先要有使用它的意图。本研究旨在探讨职前教师使用技术教育意向的预测因素,特别关注技术教学内容知识(TPCK)如何与技术接受模型(TAM)的结构相互作用。虽然以前的研究经常采用自我报告的TPCK来探索这些关系,但我们的研究使用基于测试的措施来提供更客观的评估。我们还旨在了解这些关系如何随着时间的推移而演变,特别是在教师教育的技术集成研讨会上。通过通径分析,包括N = 146名职前教师,我们检验了基于测试的TPCK、自我效能和TAM变量(感知有用性、感知易用性和使用ET的意图)之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明,自我效能是感知有用性、感知整合难易性和使用ET意向的重要预测因子,而TPCK主要影响感知有用性,并间接影响意向。此外,我们观察到TPCK和自我效能感的作用随着时间的推移而变化。本研究有助于更深入地了解专业知识的客观测量如何重塑对TAM研究的解释,并指导教师准备计划的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thirty years of mobile learning in higher education: A historical review and bibliometric analysis Exploring AI perceptions in education: unveiling the role of student and teacher motivation and self-efficacy Metaverse adoption among university Generation Z in Malaysia and Saudi Arabia: A cross-cultural analysis of individual, social and ethical impacts DiKoLAN-SK – Development of a measurement instrument for academic self-concept of digitalization-related competencies in science education Role of generative AI literary assistants in enhancing ninth-grade students’ writing motivation, flow and achievement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1