Exploring the perspectives of healthcare professionals on the most significant health disparities observed in perinatal settings: A qualitative study

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2025.104366
Kayleigh A. Gregory , Madelyn J. Hill , Mastano Dzimbiri , Ashley L. Merianos
{"title":"Exploring the perspectives of healthcare professionals on the most significant health disparities observed in perinatal settings: A qualitative study","authors":"Kayleigh A. Gregory ,&nbsp;Madelyn J. Hill ,&nbsp;Mastano Dzimbiri ,&nbsp;Ashley L. Merianos","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Perinatal mood disorders impact an estimated 15–21% of pregnant and postpartum women and are the leading cause of maternal mortality. Research indicates that social and economic factors, racism, and persistent stress contribute to maternal and infant health outcomes. Healthcare professionals can play a key role in assisting perinatal mothers with their mental health and addressing systemic disparities that may impact access to care. Understanding healthcare professionals’ perceptions is the first step in tailoring existing evidence-based interventions, implementing training in perinatal settings, and providing patient-centered care during this period.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used a purposive sampling technique to recruit 19 providers comprising of</div><div>OBGYN providers, nurse practitioners, and certified nurse midwives who work in the United States; specifically, Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana. Semi-structured interviews with open-ended interview questions were conducted. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis, and main themes emerged from the transcripts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five major themes were identified regarding the most significant health disparities observed in OBGYN practice in the Midwest area: (1) location-based disparities in access and support for perinatal care; (2) barriers to accessing perinatal care; (3) intersecting health risks; (4) racial disparities; (5) navigating isolation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Study findings provide a comprehensive view of the health disparities perceived by these healthcare professionals during the perinatal period. These findings offer insight into the systemic inequities that affect maternal and infant outcomes. Overall, results may offer evidence for improving cultural competency in the medical setting and providing a greater understanding of the complex interplay of factors that influence outcomes for mothers and infants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 104366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825000853","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Perinatal mood disorders impact an estimated 15–21% of pregnant and postpartum women and are the leading cause of maternal mortality. Research indicates that social and economic factors, racism, and persistent stress contribute to maternal and infant health outcomes. Healthcare professionals can play a key role in assisting perinatal mothers with their mental health and addressing systemic disparities that may impact access to care. Understanding healthcare professionals’ perceptions is the first step in tailoring existing evidence-based interventions, implementing training in perinatal settings, and providing patient-centered care during this period.

Methods

We used a purposive sampling technique to recruit 19 providers comprising of
OBGYN providers, nurse practitioners, and certified nurse midwives who work in the United States; specifically, Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana. Semi-structured interviews with open-ended interview questions were conducted. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis, and main themes emerged from the transcripts.

Results

Five major themes were identified regarding the most significant health disparities observed in OBGYN practice in the Midwest area: (1) location-based disparities in access and support for perinatal care; (2) barriers to accessing perinatal care; (3) intersecting health risks; (4) racial disparities; (5) navigating isolation.

Conclusions

Study findings provide a comprehensive view of the health disparities perceived by these healthcare professionals during the perinatal period. These findings offer insight into the systemic inequities that affect maternal and infant outcomes. Overall, results may offer evidence for improving cultural competency in the medical setting and providing a greater understanding of the complex interplay of factors that influence outcomes for mothers and infants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
International News May 2025 Developing antenatal education resources for CALD women: First steps, exploring what women from CALD backgrounds want and need Women's perspectives on communication following the diagnosis of gestational or postpartum cancer: A qualitative study Exploring the perspectives of healthcare professionals on the most significant health disparities observed in perinatal settings: A qualitative study A qualitative exploration of perceptions of the aetiology of preterm birth among pregnant Black women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1