The medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve in thoracic outlet syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108842
Andrea Shehaj , Shareef Shaheen , Kimberly Kray , Junjia Zhu , Elias Rizk
{"title":"The medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve in thoracic outlet syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Andrea Shehaj ,&nbsp;Shareef Shaheen ,&nbsp;Kimberly Kray ,&nbsp;Junjia Zhu ,&nbsp;Elias Rizk","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review aims to evaluate the existing literature to ascertain the utility of MABC in diagnosing TOS and the prognosis of TOS patients who have undergone surgical intervention. By synthesizing the available evidence regarding MABC's role in this patient population, this review seeks to enhance risk stratification and inform treatment decisions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews. Medline/Pubmed, Embase/Scopus, and Web of Science databases were queried for potential studies using the terms (\"Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve\" AND \"Thoracic Outlet Syndrome\"). Inclusion criteria were studies published in peer-reviewed journals discussing the utilization of medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve conduction studies in the diagnosis and/or prognosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A systematic literature review yielded 10 manuscripts, which were included after a full-text review. We determined 137 symptomatic TOS limbs. Overall, 93 % and 84 % of TOS patients presented with sensory abnormalities and weakness, respectively. Overall, 92 % of patients had an abnormal MABC nerve amplitude prior to surgery. The overall effect size (Hedges g) for the meta-analysis of four studies was 1.80 with a 95 % confidence interval of (0.63; 2.97). Analyzing surgical outcomes, the compiled data indicate an overall improvement rate of 87 % in some sensory and/or motor functions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our review demonstrates the utility of MABC as a diagnostic tool. Furthermore, we emphasize the positive response expected from surgical intervention, highlighting that more studies are needed to determine the utility of MABC as a surgical outcomes prognostic tool.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 108842"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725001258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This systematic review aims to evaluate the existing literature to ascertain the utility of MABC in diagnosing TOS and the prognosis of TOS patients who have undergone surgical intervention. By synthesizing the available evidence regarding MABC's role in this patient population, this review seeks to enhance risk stratification and inform treatment decisions.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews. Medline/Pubmed, Embase/Scopus, and Web of Science databases were queried for potential studies using the terms ("Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve" AND "Thoracic Outlet Syndrome"). Inclusion criteria were studies published in peer-reviewed journals discussing the utilization of medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve conduction studies in the diagnosis and/or prognosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

Results

A systematic literature review yielded 10 manuscripts, which were included after a full-text review. We determined 137 symptomatic TOS limbs. Overall, 93 % and 84 % of TOS patients presented with sensory abnormalities and weakness, respectively. Overall, 92 % of patients had an abnormal MABC nerve amplitude prior to surgery. The overall effect size (Hedges g) for the meta-analysis of four studies was 1.80 with a 95 % confidence interval of (0.63; 2.97). Analyzing surgical outcomes, the compiled data indicate an overall improvement rate of 87 % in some sensory and/or motor functions.

Conclusions

Our review demonstrates the utility of MABC as a diagnostic tool. Furthermore, we emphasize the positive response expected from surgical intervention, highlighting that more studies are needed to determine the utility of MABC as a surgical outcomes prognostic tool.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Glibenclamide’s efficacy on functional recovery in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Neuroinflammatory response after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A review of possible treatment targets The medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve in thoracic outlet syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis Evaluation of acute intraprocedural thromboembolism risk factors in endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms Comparative perioperative narcotic use in tlif patients: Spinal versus general anesthesia in a retrospective cohort study of 180 cases in hospital and ambulatory settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1