Allergic rhinitis and urticaria burden and antihistamine treatment options in Thailand: A modified Delphi study

Hiroshi Chantaphakul MD , Chirawat Chiewchalermsri MD , Dara Mairiang MD , Mongkol Lao-Araya MD , Orathai Piboonpocanun MD , Sira Nanthapisal MD, PhD , Wat Mitthamsiri MD , Wasu Kamchaisatian MD , Wiparat Manuyakorn MD, PhD , Pasuree Sangsupawanich MD, PhD
{"title":"Allergic rhinitis and urticaria burden and antihistamine treatment options in Thailand: A modified Delphi study","authors":"Hiroshi Chantaphakul MD ,&nbsp;Chirawat Chiewchalermsri MD ,&nbsp;Dara Mairiang MD ,&nbsp;Mongkol Lao-Araya MD ,&nbsp;Orathai Piboonpocanun MD ,&nbsp;Sira Nanthapisal MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Wat Mitthamsiri MD ,&nbsp;Wasu Kamchaisatian MD ,&nbsp;Wiparat Manuyakorn MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Pasuree Sangsupawanich MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic urticaria impose significant socioeconomic burdens on lower-income countries. Despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines, their implementation varies, and comprehensive data on these allergic conditions are notably lacking in Thailand.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We sought to describe current management strategies for AR and urticaria in Thailand.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Association of Thailand used a modified Delphi method to explore consensus on management strategies for AR and urticaria. Clinicians with expertise in these conditions provided input through a web-based questionnaire. The survey assessed disease burden in Thailand, its impact on quality of life, and the use of H<sub>1</sub>-antihistimine treatment options.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 105 experts, mainly in allergy and immunology, with 70% having more than 10 years of clinical practice, provided input. Consensus was achieved on 22 (88%) of the 25 statements. Second-generation antihistamines were preferred as initial treatment for AR and urticaria because of their reduced sedation and lack of anticholinergic effects. Almost all participants (98.1%) recommended these antihistamines for acute and chronic urticaria. Additionally, 87.6% of the respondents favored up-dosing a single antihistamine agent for managing chronic urticaria. The benefits of orally disintegrating antihistamines were particularly noted for their ease of administration and patient compliance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Results indicate a knowledge gap in evidence-based practices among Thai clinicians. Addressing this gap through enhancing clinical guideline adherence and encouraging pharmacist involvement in patient care can improve access to medication and better disease management, ultimately improving patient outcomes while reducing the socioeconomic burden of AR and urticaria.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829325000451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic urticaria impose significant socioeconomic burdens on lower-income countries. Despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines, their implementation varies, and comprehensive data on these allergic conditions are notably lacking in Thailand.

Objectives

We sought to describe current management strategies for AR and urticaria in Thailand.

Methods

The Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Association of Thailand used a modified Delphi method to explore consensus on management strategies for AR and urticaria. Clinicians with expertise in these conditions provided input through a web-based questionnaire. The survey assessed disease burden in Thailand, its impact on quality of life, and the use of H1-antihistimine treatment options.

Results

In total, 105 experts, mainly in allergy and immunology, with 70% having more than 10 years of clinical practice, provided input. Consensus was achieved on 22 (88%) of the 25 statements. Second-generation antihistamines were preferred as initial treatment for AR and urticaria because of their reduced sedation and lack of anticholinergic effects. Almost all participants (98.1%) recommended these antihistamines for acute and chronic urticaria. Additionally, 87.6% of the respondents favored up-dosing a single antihistamine agent for managing chronic urticaria. The benefits of orally disintegrating antihistamines were particularly noted for their ease of administration and patient compliance.

Conclusion

Results indicate a knowledge gap in evidence-based practices among Thai clinicians. Addressing this gap through enhancing clinical guideline adherence and encouraging pharmacist involvement in patient care can improve access to medication and better disease management, ultimately improving patient outcomes while reducing the socioeconomic burden of AR and urticaria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
92 days
期刊最新文献
Health care providers’ experiences with genetic testing in patients at risk for hereditary angioedema Allergic rhinitis and urticaria burden and antihistamine treatment options in Thailand: A modified Delphi study Association between orchiectomy and asthma: Insights from 2 population-based cohorts Peanut challenges prior to oral immunotherapy demonstrate high tolerance rates in selected patients Indoor allergen exposure in relation to sleep health among US adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1