Bridging the psychological and policy gaps: Enhancing farmer access to agricultural credit in India

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104890
Jayadeva Hiranya, Harish G. Joshi
{"title":"Bridging the psychological and policy gaps: Enhancing farmer access to agricultural credit in India","authors":"Jayadeva Hiranya,&nbsp;Harish G. Joshi","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Majority of the farmers in India remain marginalized in accessing essential financial resources despite well-intentioned agricultural credit policies. This shows there is a significant gap in their implementation and execution. This study explores the disconnect between policy frameworks and real world application, highlighting the need for transformative agricultural credit policies. It also emphasizes addressing psychological barriers in farmers' perceptions of credit access. Through qualitative research methodology, seven focus group discussions were conducted across Dakshina Kannada district in India with participants including farmers, bankers, government officials, and NGO representatives. Each discussions comprised average of 9-12 participants based on their expertise and experience in agricultural finance. The discussions revealed several themes which includes key challenges such as poor accessibility, lack of inclusivity, and limited adoption of digital innovations that persist. The study underscores the necessity for tailored credit schemes, farmer training programs, and streamlined digital technologies to address the gaps in policy execution. Moreover, it emphasizes the need for further policy interventions like a single-window credit system, holistic evaluation methods, and incentives for sustainable farming practices. Additionally, it calls for a more rigorous focus on execution at the grassroots level, including the implementation of soil testing programs to promote long-term sustainability. While acknowledging regional limitations, this research highlights the urgency of addressing the disconnect between policy and practice, offering actionable insights to improve agricultural credit systems that better serve smallholder farmers and to support in achieving global sustainability goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 104890"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825002033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Majority of the farmers in India remain marginalized in accessing essential financial resources despite well-intentioned agricultural credit policies. This shows there is a significant gap in their implementation and execution. This study explores the disconnect between policy frameworks and real world application, highlighting the need for transformative agricultural credit policies. It also emphasizes addressing psychological barriers in farmers' perceptions of credit access. Through qualitative research methodology, seven focus group discussions were conducted across Dakshina Kannada district in India with participants including farmers, bankers, government officials, and NGO representatives. Each discussions comprised average of 9-12 participants based on their expertise and experience in agricultural finance. The discussions revealed several themes which includes key challenges such as poor accessibility, lack of inclusivity, and limited adoption of digital innovations that persist. The study underscores the necessity for tailored credit schemes, farmer training programs, and streamlined digital technologies to address the gaps in policy execution. Moreover, it emphasizes the need for further policy interventions like a single-window credit system, holistic evaluation methods, and incentives for sustainable farming practices. Additionally, it calls for a more rigorous focus on execution at the grassroots level, including the implementation of soil testing programs to promote long-term sustainability. While acknowledging regional limitations, this research highlights the urgency of addressing the disconnect between policy and practice, offering actionable insights to improve agricultural credit systems that better serve smallholder farmers and to support in achieving global sustainability goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
期刊最新文献
Bridging the psychological and policy gaps: Enhancing farmer access to agricultural credit in India Music therapy and its impact on anxiety and mental well-being of Chinese students: An experimental comparison of traditional and VR approaches Should teaching strategies emphasize emotion or competence? Enhancing audience acceptance of children with autism through online music performances - evidence from China The double-edged sword of corporate social responsibility: How does value orientation affect consumer choice between CSR and corporate ability Exploring the links between childhood emotional abuse and empathy: The mediating roles of alexithymia and sensory processing sensitivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1