Refrigerant charge fault diagnosis in VRF systems using Kolmogorov-Arnold networks and their convolutional variants: A comparative analysis with traditional models

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Energy and Buildings Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115608
Xue Zhang, Yunxi Cheng, Huanxin Chen, Henda Cheng, Yi Gao
{"title":"Refrigerant charge fault diagnosis in VRF systems using Kolmogorov-Arnold networks and their convolutional variants: A comparative analysis with traditional models","authors":"Xue Zhang,&nbsp;Yunxi Cheng,&nbsp;Huanxin Chen,&nbsp;Henda Cheng,&nbsp;Yi Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) air conditioning systems are prone to refrigerant charge faults due to improper human operation or external factors during long-term operation, leading to reduced system performance and energy waste. To address this issue, this paper studies, for the first time, the diagnostic performance of the Kolmogorov–Arnold Network (KAN) and its convolutional neural network variant (Conv-KAN) for diagnosing refrigerant charge faults in VRF systems under cooling conditions, introducing new methods to the field of fault diagnosis in air conditioning systems. From the VRF refrigerant charge fault experiments, 18 significant feature variables were collected and subjected to data preprocessing.<!--> <!-->Using the processed datasets, the structures and parameters of various neural network models were optimized. Subsequently, the models’ performances were compared from multiple dimensions such as convergence speed, model performance change curves, and confusion matrices.<!--> <!-->Finally, comparisons were made with traditional models, and significance tests were conducted based on the comparison results. The results show that both KAN and Conv-KAN outperform traditional neural network models in terms of convergence speed and diagnostic accuracy, achieving diagnostic accuracies of 99.24 % and 99.02 %, respectively, which are 3.86 % and 0.04 % higher than traditional neural network models. Further comparisons with KNN, SVM, and decision tree algorithms reveal that KAN and Conv-KAN still exhibit better performance. This study not only demonstrates the excellent performance of KAN in diagnosing VRF refrigerant charge faults but also compares it with traditional neural network models, contributing to research in this field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"336 ","pages":"Article 115608"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037877882500338X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) air conditioning systems are prone to refrigerant charge faults due to improper human operation or external factors during long-term operation, leading to reduced system performance and energy waste. To address this issue, this paper studies, for the first time, the diagnostic performance of the Kolmogorov–Arnold Network (KAN) and its convolutional neural network variant (Conv-KAN) for diagnosing refrigerant charge faults in VRF systems under cooling conditions, introducing new methods to the field of fault diagnosis in air conditioning systems. From the VRF refrigerant charge fault experiments, 18 significant feature variables were collected and subjected to data preprocessing. Using the processed datasets, the structures and parameters of various neural network models were optimized. Subsequently, the models’ performances were compared from multiple dimensions such as convergence speed, model performance change curves, and confusion matrices. Finally, comparisons were made with traditional models, and significance tests were conducted based on the comparison results. The results show that both KAN and Conv-KAN outperform traditional neural network models in terms of convergence speed and diagnostic accuracy, achieving diagnostic accuracies of 99.24 % and 99.02 %, respectively, which are 3.86 % and 0.04 % higher than traditional neural network models. Further comparisons with KNN, SVM, and decision tree algorithms reveal that KAN and Conv-KAN still exhibit better performance. This study not only demonstrates the excellent performance of KAN in diagnosing VRF refrigerant charge faults but also compares it with traditional neural network models, contributing to research in this field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
期刊最新文献
Life cycle integrated multi-criteria decision model for roof assessment Cost-effective and low-carbon solutions for holistic rural building renovation in severe cold climate Circular deep renovation versus demolition with reconstruction: Environmental and financial evaluation to support decision making in the construction sector Cool wall claddings for a sustainable future: A comprehensive review on mitigating urban heat island effects and reducing carbon emissions in the built environment Design optimization of a composite typology based on RC columns and THVS girders to reduce economic cost, emissions, and embodied energy of frame building construction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1