{"title":"Yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) management with wiper- and broadcast-applied glyphosate under greenhouse conditions","authors":"Eric A. L. Jones, Jill K. Alms, David A. Vos","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Yellow toadflax [<i>Linaria vulgaris</i> (Mill.)] is an invasive perennial broadleaf weed of the Northern Great Plains region that negatively impacts forage production and wildlife habitat. Few management tactics exist that effectively control the weed species. Glyphosate is a nonselective herbicide that could effectively manage yellow toadflax but is rarely used in pasture/rangeland system due to injury of desirable vegetation. Wiper-applied glyphosate could selectivity control yellow toadflax with minimal injury on desirable vegetation. Greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine the effectiveness of various concentrations and rates of wiper- and broadcast-applied glyphosate on flowering yellow toadflax plants. Plants treated with glyphosate via wiper applicator exhibited injury (63%–80%) and reduced fresh biomass (53%–73%) compared to the nontreated plants. However, the incurred injury and reductions of fresh biomass were not different across the tested glyphosate concentrations. Plants treated with glyphosate via broadcast application(1260 and 2520 g ae ha<sup>−1</sup>) exhibited injury (48%–62%), but biomass was no different when compared to the nontreated plants. The results of the experiments suggest that labeled glyphosate concentrations (33%–75%) for wiper applications provide similar control of yellow toadflax under greenhouse conditions. Broadcast glyphosate applications caused injury on the treated plants but did not decrease biomass compared to nontreated plants. Therefore, wiper-applied glyphosate may be a more viable option to manage yellow toadflax.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Yellow toadflax [Linaria vulgaris (Mill.)] is an invasive perennial broadleaf weed of the Northern Great Plains region that negatively impacts forage production and wildlife habitat. Few management tactics exist that effectively control the weed species. Glyphosate is a nonselective herbicide that could effectively manage yellow toadflax but is rarely used in pasture/rangeland system due to injury of desirable vegetation. Wiper-applied glyphosate could selectivity control yellow toadflax with minimal injury on desirable vegetation. Greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine the effectiveness of various concentrations and rates of wiper- and broadcast-applied glyphosate on flowering yellow toadflax plants. Plants treated with glyphosate via wiper applicator exhibited injury (63%–80%) and reduced fresh biomass (53%–73%) compared to the nontreated plants. However, the incurred injury and reductions of fresh biomass were not different across the tested glyphosate concentrations. Plants treated with glyphosate via broadcast application(1260 and 2520 g ae ha−1) exhibited injury (48%–62%), but biomass was no different when compared to the nontreated plants. The results of the experiments suggest that labeled glyphosate concentrations (33%–75%) for wiper applications provide similar control of yellow toadflax under greenhouse conditions. Broadcast glyphosate applications caused injury on the treated plants but did not decrease biomass compared to nontreated plants. Therefore, wiper-applied glyphosate may be a more viable option to manage yellow toadflax.
黄蟾蜍[Linaria vulgaris (Mill.)]是北部大平原地区入侵的多年生阔叶杂草,对饲料生产和野生动物栖息地产生负面影响。现有的有效控制杂草种类的管理策略很少。草甘膦是一种能有效治理黄蟾蜍的非选择性除草剂,但由于对理想植被的损害,在牧场系统中很少使用。雨刷施用草甘膦可选择性防治黄蟾蜍,对理想植被的伤害最小。进行了温室试验,以确定不同浓度和速率的草甘膦雨刷和播施对开花黄蟾蜍植物的有效性。与未施用草甘膦的植物相比,通过雨刷器施用草甘膦的植物表现出损伤(63%-80%)和新鲜生物量减少(53%-73%)。然而,在不同浓度的草甘膦测试中,造成的伤害和新鲜生物量的减少并没有不同。草甘膦撒播处理(1260和2520 g / h - 1)的植株受到伤害(48%-62%),但生物量与未处理植株相比没有差异。实验结果表明,在温室条件下,标记草甘膦浓度(33%-75%)的雨刷施用对黄蟾蜍的控制效果相似。播施草甘膦对处理植株造成伤害,但与未处理植株相比,生物量没有减少。因此,在雨刷上施用草甘膦可能是管理黄蟾蜍的更可行的选择。