Preservice teachers' framing and noticing of elementary students' ways of communicating scientific ideas

IF 4.5 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Research in Science Teaching Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1002/tea.21987
Alison K. Mercier, Tierney B. Hinman
{"title":"Preservice teachers' framing and noticing of elementary students' ways of communicating scientific ideas","authors":"Alison K. Mercier,&nbsp;Tierney B. Hinman","doi":"10.1002/tea.21987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Children draw on diverse sensemaking repertoires that are inclusive of their cultural and community knowledge to make sense of science in the world around them. However, preservice teachers often do not notice the science embedded in children's explanations of phenomena. Discourses that frame children, particularly those from minoritized communities, through deficit-based lenses contribute to this deficit-based noticing, perpetuating inequitable science teaching practices. This exploratory case study draws on a noticing framework that uses framing, attending, interpreting, and responding to examine how preservice teachers' anti-deficit noticing can be supported. Specifically, the study focuses on what 44 preservice teachers, enrolled in teacher preparation classes taught by the authors, notice in children's scientific explanations and how they interpret that noticing in relation to their own framing. Noticing profiles were constructed for preservice teachers using (a) data collected from written explanations of what constitutes a “good” scientific explanation and (b) written reflections of five noticing sessions during which preservice teachers viewed videos featuring elementary students providing explanations of a scientific phenomenon. Findings discuss three key patterns reflected across preservice teacher's noticing profiles: responses that reflected conventional noticing with more anti-deficit noticing in later sessions, responses that reflected potential for anti-deficit attending but were interpreted in deficit-based ways, and responses that shifted across noticing sessions in a non-linear trajectory toward more anti-deficit noticing. Implications for science teacher education explore practices that facilitate shifts toward more anti-deficit, equitable noticing with considerations for the dialogic nature between framing and noticing.</p>","PeriodicalId":48369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","volume":"62 4","pages":"942-970"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.21987","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children draw on diverse sensemaking repertoires that are inclusive of their cultural and community knowledge to make sense of science in the world around them. However, preservice teachers often do not notice the science embedded in children's explanations of phenomena. Discourses that frame children, particularly those from minoritized communities, through deficit-based lenses contribute to this deficit-based noticing, perpetuating inequitable science teaching practices. This exploratory case study draws on a noticing framework that uses framing, attending, interpreting, and responding to examine how preservice teachers' anti-deficit noticing can be supported. Specifically, the study focuses on what 44 preservice teachers, enrolled in teacher preparation classes taught by the authors, notice in children's scientific explanations and how they interpret that noticing in relation to their own framing. Noticing profiles were constructed for preservice teachers using (a) data collected from written explanations of what constitutes a “good” scientific explanation and (b) written reflections of five noticing sessions during which preservice teachers viewed videos featuring elementary students providing explanations of a scientific phenomenon. Findings discuss three key patterns reflected across preservice teacher's noticing profiles: responses that reflected conventional noticing with more anti-deficit noticing in later sessions, responses that reflected potential for anti-deficit attending but were interpreted in deficit-based ways, and responses that shifted across noticing sessions in a non-linear trajectory toward more anti-deficit noticing. Implications for science teacher education explore practices that facilitate shifts toward more anti-deficit, equitable noticing with considerations for the dialogic nature between framing and noticing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职前教师对小学生科学思想传播方式的建构与注意
儿童利用包含其文化和社区知识的各种意义表达库来理解周围世界的科学。然而,职前教师往往没有注意到孩子们对现象的解释中蕴含的科学。通过以缺陷为基础的镜头来框定儿童,特别是那些来自少数族裔社区的儿童的话语,助长了这种以缺陷为基础的注意,使不公平的科学教学实践永久化。本探索性案例研究利用了一个注意框架,该框架使用框架、参与、解释和回应来研究如何支持职前教师的反赤字注意。具体来说,这项研究关注的是44名参加了作者教授的教师预备班的职前教师,他们在儿童的科学解释中注意到了什么,以及他们如何将这种注意与他们自己的框架联系起来。为职前教师构建了注意配置文件,使用(a)收集的数据,这些数据来自于对什么是“好的”科学解释的书面解释,以及(b)五次注意会话的书面反思,在此期间,职前教师观看了以小学生提供科学现象解释的视频。研究结果讨论了职前教师注意档案中反映的三种关键模式:反应反映了传统注意,在后来的会议中更多地注意到反缺陷;反应反映了反缺陷参与的潜力,但被解释为基于缺陷的方式;反应在注意会议中以非线性轨迹转向更多的反缺陷注意。对科学教师教育的启示探索实践,促进转向更反赤字,公平的注意,并考虑框架和注意之间的对话性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Journal of Research in Science Teaching EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
19.60%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, the official journal of NARST: A Worldwide Organization for Improving Science Teaching and Learning Through Research, publishes reports for science education researchers and practitioners on issues of science teaching and learning and science education policy. Scholarly manuscripts within the domain of the Journal of Research in Science Teaching include, but are not limited to, investigations employing qualitative, ethnographic, historical, survey, philosophical, case study research, quantitative, experimental, quasi-experimental, data mining, and data analytics approaches; position papers; policy perspectives; critical reviews of the literature; and comments and criticism.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Haptic Experiences Shift Students' Representational Gestures and Knowledge Resources Rigor and Representation: Leading the Next Five Years of JRST Indigenous Students Enacting and Advancing Sovereignty in Higher Education: Relationships, Relevance, Reciprocity, Responsibility, Representation, and Respect Along STEMM Pathways
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1