Spectral Wave Energy Dissipation by a Seagrass Meadow

IF 3.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1029/2024JC020938
Nery Contti Neto, Ryan J. Lowe, Marco Ghisalberti, Andrew Pomeroy, Matthew Reidenbach, Mario Conde-Frias, Renan F. da Silva
{"title":"Spectral Wave Energy Dissipation by a Seagrass Meadow","authors":"Nery Contti Neto,&nbsp;Ryan J. Lowe,&nbsp;Marco Ghisalberti,&nbsp;Andrew Pomeroy,&nbsp;Matthew Reidenbach,&nbsp;Mario Conde-Frias,&nbsp;Renan F. da Silva","doi":"10.1029/2024JC020938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Existing formulations for predicting wave dissipation by submerged canopies generally fall into three categories where (a) an empirical coefficient (energy dissipation factor) is attributed to the canopy ignoring its physical properties; (b) estimates of canopy drag forces based on a bulk drag coefficient and undisturbed velocities above the canopy are used to estimate dissipation; and (c) canopy flow theory is used to account for how modifications to in-canopy flows influence canopy forces and associated dissipation. We measured rates of spectral wave dissipation across a dense seagrass meadow comprised of <i>Posidonia australis</i> in southwestern Australia, which also included high-resolution flow measurements within and above the seagrass canopy. These observations were used to quantify the effectiveness of the three different approaches to predict observed rates of spectral wave dissipation. The results showed that conventional approaches that do not account for canopy flow modifications and/or seagrass flexibility tend to overestimate both bulk and frequency-dependent wave dissipation. Conversely, approaches that consider frequency-dependent flow attenuation in canopies were found to improve predictions of wave dissipation, particularly when also accounting for how the deflection of flexible seagrass blades induced by flow modifies the effective canopy height. The results show that the canopy flow velocities induced by short period wind waves were less attenuated than longer period swell, explaining the frequency dependency of rates of wave dissipation, with shorter period wave heights being more efficiently attenuated by the meadow.</p>","PeriodicalId":54340,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans","volume":"130 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JC020938","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JC020938","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing formulations for predicting wave dissipation by submerged canopies generally fall into three categories where (a) an empirical coefficient (energy dissipation factor) is attributed to the canopy ignoring its physical properties; (b) estimates of canopy drag forces based on a bulk drag coefficient and undisturbed velocities above the canopy are used to estimate dissipation; and (c) canopy flow theory is used to account for how modifications to in-canopy flows influence canopy forces and associated dissipation. We measured rates of spectral wave dissipation across a dense seagrass meadow comprised of Posidonia australis in southwestern Australia, which also included high-resolution flow measurements within and above the seagrass canopy. These observations were used to quantify the effectiveness of the three different approaches to predict observed rates of spectral wave dissipation. The results showed that conventional approaches that do not account for canopy flow modifications and/or seagrass flexibility tend to overestimate both bulk and frequency-dependent wave dissipation. Conversely, approaches that consider frequency-dependent flow attenuation in canopies were found to improve predictions of wave dissipation, particularly when also accounting for how the deflection of flexible seagrass blades induced by flow modifies the effective canopy height. The results show that the canopy flow velocities induced by short period wind waves were less attenuated than longer period swell, explaining the frequency dependency of rates of wave dissipation, with shorter period wave heights being more efficiently attenuated by the meadow.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海草草甸的光谱波能量耗散
现有的预测淹没冠层耗散波的公式一般分为三类:(a)将经验系数(能量耗散因子)归因于冠层,而忽略其物理性质;(b)基于整体阻力系数的冠层阻力估计和冠层上方未受干扰的速度用于估计耗散;(c)冠层流动理论用于解释冠层内流动的变化如何影响冠层力和相关耗散。我们测量了澳大利亚西南部由Posidonia australis组成的密集海草草甸的光谱波耗散率,其中还包括海草冠层内部和上方的高分辨率流量测量。这些观测结果用于量化三种不同方法预测观测到的谱波耗散率的有效性。结果表明,不考虑冠层水流变化和/或海草灵活性的传统方法往往高估了体积和频率相关的波浪耗散。相反,考虑冠层中与频率相关的水流衰减的方法被发现可以改善对波浪耗散的预测,特别是当考虑到流动引起的柔性海草叶片的偏转如何改变有效冠层高度时。结果表明:短周期风浪对冠层流速的衰减小于长周期风浪对冠层流速的衰减,说明了波浪耗散率的频率依赖性,短周期风浪对冠层流速的衰减更有效;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans
Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans Earth and Planetary Sciences-Oceanography
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
429
期刊最新文献
Differences Between Lighter and Denser Portions of Subtropical Mode Water in Volume Variations and Thickness Anomaly Propagation Increasing Net Community Production in Western North Pacific Marginal Seas Due to Anthropogenic Nitrogen Study of Mesoscale Eddies Affecting Wind Power Input in the Kuroshio Extension Region Increasing Net Community Production in Western North Pacific Marginal Seas Due to Anthropogenic Nitrogen Impact of Fully Time-Varying Freshwater Fluxes From Greenland and Rivers on Externally Forced and Internal Sea Level Variability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1