{"title":"Radiotherapy volume delineation based on MRI and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/MRI in locally recurrent rectal cancer.","authors":"Yu-Kun Lin, Lei-Lei Zhu, Jun Zhao, Zuo-Lin Xiang","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04859-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the value of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) functional imaging in the radiotherapy of locally recurrent rectal cancer by comparing the target volume delineation based on PET/MRI and MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-six patients who were diagnosed with locally recurrent rectal cancer were included in this study. Patients underwent PET/MRI, and the target volume was delineated independently by three radiation oncologists. The degree of overlap, spatial consistency, and difference in the target volume delineated based on the two methods were compared. The efficacy of PET/MRI and MRI in detecting metastatic lymph nodes was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In radiotherapy for patients with recurrent rectal cancer, the gross tumor volume (GTV), clinical target area (CTV), and nodal gross tumor volume (GTVn) delineated based on MRI and PET/MRI were correlated (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Differences in CTV were statistically significant (P < 0.001), and the CTV greatly overlapped spatially. There is spatial heterogeneity in GTV and GTVn based on the two imaging modalities. Metastatic lymph node analysis revealed that the detection efficiency of the two modalities was the same at the population level. There was no significant difference in the number of metastatic lymph nodes detected (P = 0.521).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PET/MRI can improve the accuracy of target volume delineation and has similar advantages to MRI in assessing the number of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with recurrent rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04859-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the value of 18F-FDG-positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) functional imaging in the radiotherapy of locally recurrent rectal cancer by comparing the target volume delineation based on PET/MRI and MRI.
Materials and methods: Twenty-six patients who were diagnosed with locally recurrent rectal cancer were included in this study. Patients underwent PET/MRI, and the target volume was delineated independently by three radiation oncologists. The degree of overlap, spatial consistency, and difference in the target volume delineated based on the two methods were compared. The efficacy of PET/MRI and MRI in detecting metastatic lymph nodes was analyzed.
Results: In radiotherapy for patients with recurrent rectal cancer, the gross tumor volume (GTV), clinical target area (CTV), and nodal gross tumor volume (GTVn) delineated based on MRI and PET/MRI were correlated (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Differences in CTV were statistically significant (P < 0.001), and the CTV greatly overlapped spatially. There is spatial heterogeneity in GTV and GTVn based on the two imaging modalities. Metastatic lymph node analysis revealed that the detection efficiency of the two modalities was the same at the population level. There was no significant difference in the number of metastatic lymph nodes detected (P = 0.521).
Conclusion: PET/MRI can improve the accuracy of target volume delineation and has similar advantages to MRI in assessing the number of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with recurrent rectal cancer.
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits