Determinants and dynamics of the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Poland.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Advances in medical sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.advms.2025.03.002
Justyna Adamczuk, Karol Adam Kamiński, Sebastian Sołomacha, Małgorzata Kazberuk, Magdalena Chlabicz, Piotr Czupryna, Justyna Dunaj-Małyszko, Anna Citko, Paweł Sowa, Marlena Dubatówka, Magda Łapińska, Łukasz Kiszkiel, Łukasz Szczerbiński, Piotr Paweł Laskowski, Maciej Alimowski, Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska
{"title":"Determinants and dynamics of the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Poland.","authors":"Justyna Adamczuk, Karol Adam Kamiński, Sebastian Sołomacha, Małgorzata Kazberuk, Magdalena Chlabicz, Piotr Czupryna, Justyna Dunaj-Małyszko, Anna Citko, Paweł Sowa, Marlena Dubatówka, Magda Łapińska, Łukasz Kiszkiel, Łukasz Szczerbiński, Piotr Paweł Laskowski, Maciej Alimowski, Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska","doi":"10.1016/j.advms.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the present study, we aimed to assess the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in population or in convalescents 6 months after infection with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study population consisted of 2 groups, i.e. group I: 232 post-COVID-19 patients, and group II: 544 patients from a population cohort. Detection of anti-N antibodies was performed with Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 and anti-S antibodies with LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the Omicron wave, gradual increase in the prevalence of the analyzed antibodies was observed in the general population - up to 92.5% of anti-S and 69.7% of anti-N antibodies. In the COVID-19 convalescents, 6 months after infection, 4.3% and 3.7% did not generate significant titer of anti-S and anti-N antibodies, respectively. Among patients, who were vaccinated, 1% did not generate anti-S antibodies. Median age of those who did not respond was higher than those who responded. Sex did not influence the results. Comparison of anti-N and anti-S antibodies 6 months after infection in the whole group showed higher anti-N titer in patients who suffered from the disease than in the general population. In the general population, 17.4% of participants had anti-N antibodies, and 9% had anti-S antibodies, despite no prior vaccination or history of COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High prevalence of anti-N antibodies in patients reporting no history of COVID-19 during last wave, even after official end of the pandemics suggests high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the environment and frequent asymptomatic or unspecific COVID-19, what is of high importance from the public health perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":7347,"journal":{"name":"Advances in medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advms.2025.03.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In the present study, we aimed to assess the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in population or in convalescents 6 months after infection with COVID-19.

Patients and methods: The study population consisted of 2 groups, i.e. group I: 232 post-COVID-19 patients, and group II: 544 patients from a population cohort. Detection of anti-N antibodies was performed with Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 and anti-S antibodies with LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG tests.

Results: After the Omicron wave, gradual increase in the prevalence of the analyzed antibodies was observed in the general population - up to 92.5% of anti-S and 69.7% of anti-N antibodies. In the COVID-19 convalescents, 6 months after infection, 4.3% and 3.7% did not generate significant titer of anti-S and anti-N antibodies, respectively. Among patients, who were vaccinated, 1% did not generate anti-S antibodies. Median age of those who did not respond was higher than those who responded. Sex did not influence the results. Comparison of anti-N and anti-S antibodies 6 months after infection in the whole group showed higher anti-N titer in patients who suffered from the disease than in the general population. In the general population, 17.4% of participants had anti-N antibodies, and 9% had anti-S antibodies, despite no prior vaccination or history of COVID-19.

Conclusions: High prevalence of anti-N antibodies in patients reporting no history of COVID-19 during last wave, even after official end of the pandemics suggests high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the environment and frequent asymptomatic or unspecific COVID-19, what is of high importance from the public health perspective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in medical sciences
Advances in medical sciences 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Advances in Medical Sciences is an international, peer-reviewed journal that welcomes original research articles and reviews on current advances in life sciences, preclinical and clinical medicine, and related disciplines. The Journal’s primary aim is to make every effort to contribute to progress in medical sciences. The strive is to bridge laboratory and clinical settings with cutting edge research findings and new developments. Advances in Medical Sciences publishes articles which bring novel insights into diagnostic and molecular imaging, offering essential prior knowledge for diagnosis and treatment indispensable in all areas of medical sciences. It also publishes articles on pathological sciences giving foundation knowledge on the overall study of human diseases. Through its publications Advances in Medical Sciences also stresses the importance of pharmaceutical sciences as a rapidly and ever expanding area of research on drug design, development, action and evaluation contributing significantly to a variety of scientific disciplines. The journal welcomes submissions from the following disciplines: General and internal medicine, Cancer research, Genetics, Endocrinology, Gastroenterology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Immunology and Allergy, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cell and molecular Biology, Haematology, Biochemistry, Clinical and Experimental Pathology.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of patients with severe asthma reported to be eligible or non-eligible for biologic therapy in Poland: results from the international observational study RECOGNISE. Determinants and dynamics of the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Poland. Column Chart Prediction Model for Ovarian Cancer Based on Serum Ovarian Tumor Related Biomarkers and Validation. Trimethylamine N-oxide as a potential prognostic biomarker for mortality in patients with COVID-19 disease Evaluation of salusin-β in paediatric patients with chronic kidney disease or hypertension
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1