Bi-parametric MRI-based quantification radiomics model for the noninvasive prediction of histopathology and biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer surgery: a multicenter study
Si Yu Wu, Ying Wang, Ping Fan, Tianqi Xu, Pengxi Han, Yan Deng, Yiming Song, Ximing Wang, Mian Zhang
{"title":"Bi-parametric MRI-based quantification radiomics model for the noninvasive prediction of histopathology and biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer surgery: a multicenter study","authors":"Si Yu Wu, Ying Wang, Ping Fan, Tianqi Xu, Pengxi Han, Yan Deng, Yiming Song, Ximing Wang, Mian Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04873-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and objectives</h3><p>To develop and evaluate the performance of a noninvasive radiomics combined model based on preoperative bi-parametric MRI to assess biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk factors and to predict biochemical recurrence free survival in PCa patients.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Pretreatment bp-MRI and clinicopathology data of 666 (discovery cohort, 545; test cohort, 121) PCa patients from four centers between January 2015 to March 2023 were retrospectively included. To predict BCR, extracapsular extension (ECE), pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM), and Gleason Grade group (GG), the pred-BCR, pred-ECE, pred-PLNM, and pred-GG models were developed, respectively. Subsequently, a logistic regression algorithm was used to combine one or more radiomics models and clinicopathology variables into radiomics-clinicopathology combined models (M1, M2) and radiomics-clinical combined model without pathology results (M3) for predicting BCR.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In the test cohort, the AUCs for the pred-BCR, pred-ECE, pred-PLNM, and pred-GG models were 0.841, 0.764, 0.896, and 0.698. Of the three combined models, M3 has the best prediction performance with an AUC of 0.884, M2 is the following with an AUC of 0.863, and M1 has the lowest performance with an AUC of 0.838 (95% CI 0.750–0.925) in the test cohort. Delong’s test showed that the M3 was significantly higher (M1 vs. M3, <i>p</i> = 0.028; M2 vs. M3, <i>p</i> = 0.044).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The combined model developed in this study, which is not dependent on pathologic biopsies, can noninvasively predict postoperative histopathology and BCR after PCa, therefore may provide decision support for follow-up and treatment strategies for patients in the postoperative period.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 9","pages":"4320 - 4330"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-025-04873-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale and objectives
To develop and evaluate the performance of a noninvasive radiomics combined model based on preoperative bi-parametric MRI to assess biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk factors and to predict biochemical recurrence free survival in PCa patients.
Materials and methods
Pretreatment bp-MRI and clinicopathology data of 666 (discovery cohort, 545; test cohort, 121) PCa patients from four centers between January 2015 to March 2023 were retrospectively included. To predict BCR, extracapsular extension (ECE), pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM), and Gleason Grade group (GG), the pred-BCR, pred-ECE, pred-PLNM, and pred-GG models were developed, respectively. Subsequently, a logistic regression algorithm was used to combine one or more radiomics models and clinicopathology variables into radiomics-clinicopathology combined models (M1, M2) and radiomics-clinical combined model without pathology results (M3) for predicting BCR.
Results
In the test cohort, the AUCs for the pred-BCR, pred-ECE, pred-PLNM, and pred-GG models were 0.841, 0.764, 0.896, and 0.698. Of the three combined models, M3 has the best prediction performance with an AUC of 0.884, M2 is the following with an AUC of 0.863, and M1 has the lowest performance with an AUC of 0.838 (95% CI 0.750–0.925) in the test cohort. Delong’s test showed that the M3 was significantly higher (M1 vs. M3, p = 0.028; M2 vs. M3, p = 0.044).
Conclusion
The combined model developed in this study, which is not dependent on pathologic biopsies, can noninvasively predict postoperative histopathology and BCR after PCa, therefore may provide decision support for follow-up and treatment strategies for patients in the postoperative period.
理由和目的:开发和评估基于术前双参数MRI的无创放射组学联合模型的性能,以评估PCa患者的生化复发(BCR)危险因素并预测生化无复发生存。材料与方法:预处理bp-MRI及临床病理资料666例(发现队列,545例;回顾性纳入2015年1月至2023年3月来自四个中心的121例PCa患者。为了预测BCR、囊外延伸(ECE)、盆腔淋巴结转移(PLNM)和Gleason分级组(GG),分别建立了pred-BCR、pred-ECE、pred-PLNM和pred-GG模型。随后,采用logistic回归算法将一个或多个放射组学模型和临床病理变量组合为放射组学-临床病理联合模型(M1, M2)和无病理结果的放射组学-临床联合模型(M3),用于预测BCR。结果:在测试队列中,pred-BCR、pred-ECE、pred-PLNM和pred-GG模型的auc分别为0.841、0.764、0.896和0.698。在三个组合模型中,M3的预测效果最好,AUC为0.884,M2次之,AUC为0.863,M1的预测效果最差,AUC为0.838 (95% CI 0.750-0.925)。Delong检验显示,M3显著高于M3 (M1 vs. M3, p = 0.028;M2 vs. M3, p = 0.044)。结论:本研究建立的联合模型不依赖于病理活检,可无创预测前列腺癌术后组织病理学及BCR,为患者术后随访及治疗策略提供决策支持。
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits