Diagnosis of moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis using deep learning-based automated attenuation measurements on contrast-enhanced CT

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1007/s00261-025-04872-5
Hae Young Kim, Kyung Jin Lee, Seung Soo Lee, Se Jin Choi, Dong Hwan Kim, Subin Heo, Hyeon Ji Jang, Sang Hyun Choi
{"title":"Diagnosis of moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis using deep learning-based automated attenuation measurements on contrast-enhanced CT","authors":"Hae Young Kim,&nbsp;Kyung Jin Lee,&nbsp;Seung Soo Lee,&nbsp;Se Jin Choi,&nbsp;Dong Hwan Kim,&nbsp;Subin Heo,&nbsp;Hyeon Ji Jang,&nbsp;Sang Hyun Choi","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04872-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the utility of deep learning-based automated attenuation measurements on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) for diagnosing moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis (HS), using histology as reference standard.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 3,620 liver donors (2,393 men and 1,227 women; mean age, 31.7 ± 9.4 years), divided into the development (<i>n</i> = 2,714) and test (<i>n</i> = 906) cohorts. Attenuation values of the liver and spleen on CECT were measured both manually and using a deep learning algorithm (before and after radiologists’ correction of segmentation errors). Performance of: (1) liver attenuation and (2) liver–spleen attenuation difference for diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS (&gt; 33%) was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Three different criteria targeting 95% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and the maximum Youden’s index, respectively, for diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS, were developed and validated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The performance of deep learning-based measurements did not differ significantly, with or without radiologists’ corrections (<i>p</i> = 0.13). Liver–spleen attenuation difference outperformed liver attenuation alone in diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS in both deep learning-based (AUC, 0.868 vs. 0.821; <i>p</i> = 0.001) and manual (AUC, 0.871 vs. 0.823; <i>p</i> = 0.001) measurements. In the test cohort, the criterion targeting 95% sensitivity for diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS (liver–spleen attenuation difference ≤ 2.8 HU) yielded 92.0% (69/75) sensitivity and 48.5% (403/831) specificity. The criterion targeting 95% specificity (liver–spleen attenuation difference ≤ -18.8 HU) yielded 53.3% (40/75) sensitivity and 95.7% (795/831) specificity. The criterion targeting the maximum Youden’s index (liver–spleen attenuation difference ≤ -8.2 HU) yielded 82.7% (62/75) sensitivity and 80.7% (671/831) specificity.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Deep learning-based automated measurements of liver and spleen attenuation on CECT can be used reliably to detect moderate-to-severe HS.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 9","pages":"4139 - 4147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-025-04872-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the utility of deep learning-based automated attenuation measurements on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) for diagnosing moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis (HS), using histology as reference standard.

Methods

This retrospective study included 3,620 liver donors (2,393 men and 1,227 women; mean age, 31.7 ± 9.4 years), divided into the development (n = 2,714) and test (n = 906) cohorts. Attenuation values of the liver and spleen on CECT were measured both manually and using a deep learning algorithm (before and after radiologists’ correction of segmentation errors). Performance of: (1) liver attenuation and (2) liver–spleen attenuation difference for diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS (> 33%) was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Three different criteria targeting 95% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and the maximum Youden’s index, respectively, for diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS, were developed and validated.

Results

The performance of deep learning-based measurements did not differ significantly, with or without radiologists’ corrections (p = 0.13). Liver–spleen attenuation difference outperformed liver attenuation alone in diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS in both deep learning-based (AUC, 0.868 vs. 0.821; p = 0.001) and manual (AUC, 0.871 vs. 0.823; p = 0.001) measurements. In the test cohort, the criterion targeting 95% sensitivity for diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS (liver–spleen attenuation difference ≤ 2.8 HU) yielded 92.0% (69/75) sensitivity and 48.5% (403/831) specificity. The criterion targeting 95% specificity (liver–spleen attenuation difference ≤ -18.8 HU) yielded 53.3% (40/75) sensitivity and 95.7% (795/831) specificity. The criterion targeting the maximum Youden’s index (liver–spleen attenuation difference ≤ -8.2 HU) yielded 82.7% (62/75) sensitivity and 80.7% (671/831) specificity.

Conclusion

Deep learning-based automated measurements of liver and spleen attenuation on CECT can be used reliably to detect moderate-to-severe HS.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用基于深度学习的自动衰减测量在增强CT上诊断中重度肝脏脂肪变性。
目的:以组织学为参考标准,评估基于深度学习的对比增强CT (CECT)自动衰减测量在诊断中重度肝脂肪变性(HS)中的应用价值。方法:这项回顾性研究包括3620名肝脏供者(2393名男性和1227名女性;平均年龄(31.7±9.4岁),分为发展组(n = 2714)和试验组(n = 906)。肝脏和脾脏在CECT上的衰减值分别采用人工和深度学习算法测量(放射科医生校正分割误差前后)。采用受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估(1)肝脏衰减和(2)肝脾衰减差诊断中重度HS(> 33%)的表现。制定并验证了三种不同的标准,分别针对95%的敏感性、95%的特异性和最大约登指数,用于诊断中重度HS。结果:无论是否有放射科医生的校正,基于深度学习的测量效果没有显著差异(p = 0.13)。基于深度学习的肝脾衰减差诊断中重度HS优于单纯肝衰减(AUC, 0.868 vs. 0.821;p = 0.001)和手工(AUC, 0.871 vs. 0.823;P = 0.001)。在试验队列中,诊断中重度HS(肝脾衰减差≤2.8 HU)的目标灵敏度为95%,敏感性为92.0%(69/75),特异性为48.5%(404 /831)。该标准特异性为95%(肝脾衰减差≤-18.8 HU),敏感性为53.3%(40/75),特异性为95.7%(795/831)。以最大约登指数(肝脾衰减差≤-8.2 HU)为标准的敏感性为82.7%(62/75),特异性为80.7%(671/831)。结论:基于深度学习的CECT肝脾衰减自动测量可可靠地用于中重度HS的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
Navigating the new frontier: growth, integrity, and our vision for 2026 From duodenitis to stricture: Decoding the impact of partial annular pancreas over years A CT-based 2.5D deep learning model for preoperative T-staging in gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study Early and delayed post-cesarean complications: an imaging review 18F-FDG PET-based ensemble deep learning model for the prediction of lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1