The impact of different cervical planning target volume designs on efficacy and toxicity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13865-y
Lin Wang, Hui-Min Wang, Fan Tang, Yan-Ting Zhang, Rong-Rong Shi, Sheng-Hui Wang, Si-Chao Liang, Liao-Ming Gao, Zhi-Ting Chen, Bao-Feng Li, Bei Chen
{"title":"The impact of different cervical planning target volume designs on efficacy and toxicity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Lin Wang, Hui-Min Wang, Fan Tang, Yan-Ting Zhang, Rong-Rong Shi, Sheng-Hui Wang, Si-Chao Liang, Liao-Ming Gao, Zhi-Ting Chen, Bao-Feng Li, Bei Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13865-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, two radiation target delineation patterns are used for the cervical lymph node area.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compares the efficacy and toxicity of two radiation target volume delineation patterns for planning target volumes (PTVs) in NPC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 387 non-metastatic NPC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy from January 2017 to December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: the 2-PTV group with two dose gradients (50-54 Gy and 66-70 Gy) and the 3-PTV group with an additional 60-63 Gy dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a median follow-up of 51.2 months, the 3-year regional relapse-free survival (RRFS) showed no significant differences between the 3-PTV and 2-PTV groups (96.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 96.5%-96.8%] and 96.3% [95% CI: 96.2%-96.3%]). In the N3 subgroup, the 3-year RRFS was also comparable between the 3-PTV and 2-PTV groups (96.2% [95% CI: 76%-99%] vs. 95% [95% CI: 69%-99%], p = 0.727). Importantly, the 2-PTV group demonstrated significantly lower rates of grade 3/4 dermatitis (5.1% vs. 16.5%; HR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.82-0.94, p = 0.002) and xerostomia (49.6% vs. 67%; HR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.72-0.84, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 2-PTV regimen achieved equivalent survival outcomes while significantly reducing treatment-related toxicities compared to the 3-PTV approach. These results suggest that the 2-PTV strategy may offer a more favorable therapeutic profile for NPC patients, particularly in minimizing severe dermatitis and xerostomia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"485"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13865-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, two radiation target delineation patterns are used for the cervical lymph node area.

Purpose: This study compares the efficacy and toxicity of two radiation target volume delineation patterns for planning target volumes (PTVs) in NPC patients.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included 387 non-metastatic NPC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy from January 2017 to December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: the 2-PTV group with two dose gradients (50-54 Gy and 66-70 Gy) and the 3-PTV group with an additional 60-63 Gy dose.

Results: After a median follow-up of 51.2 months, the 3-year regional relapse-free survival (RRFS) showed no significant differences between the 3-PTV and 2-PTV groups (96.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 96.5%-96.8%] and 96.3% [95% CI: 96.2%-96.3%]). In the N3 subgroup, the 3-year RRFS was also comparable between the 3-PTV and 2-PTV groups (96.2% [95% CI: 76%-99%] vs. 95% [95% CI: 69%-99%], p = 0.727). Importantly, the 2-PTV group demonstrated significantly lower rates of grade 3/4 dermatitis (5.1% vs. 16.5%; HR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.82-0.94, p = 0.002) and xerostomia (49.6% vs. 67%; HR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.72-0.84, p = 0.002).

Conclusions: The 2-PTV regimen achieved equivalent survival outcomes while significantly reducing treatment-related toxicities compared to the 3-PTV approach. These results suggest that the 2-PTV strategy may offer a more favorable therapeutic profile for NPC patients, particularly in minimizing severe dermatitis and xerostomia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Telpegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicentre, randomized, phase 3 study. The impact of different cervical planning target volume designs on efficacy and toxicity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study. Tumor treating fields enhance anti-PD therapy by improving CCL2/8 and CXCL9/CXCL10 expression through inducing immunogenic cell death in NSCLC models. What is the impact of perineural invasion on the prognosis of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association between NAT10 gene rs8187 G > A polymorphism and Wilms tumor susceptibility in Chinese Han children: a five-center case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1