Comparative performance of CKD-EPI equations in people with diabetes: An international pooled analysis of individual participant data.

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes research and clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112104
Rodney Kwok, Kartik Kishore, Tina Zafari, Digsu N Koye, Mariam Hachem, Ian H de Boer, Tae-Dong Jeong, Won-Ki Min, Esteban Porrini, Petter Bjornstad, Richard J MacIsaac, Leonid Churilov, Elif I Ekinci
{"title":"Comparative performance of CKD-EPI equations in people with diabetes: An international pooled analysis of individual participant data.","authors":"Rodney Kwok, Kartik Kishore, Tina Zafari, Digsu N Koye, Mariam Hachem, Ian H de Boer, Tae-Dong Jeong, Won-Ki Min, Esteban Porrini, Petter Bjornstad, Richard J MacIsaac, Leonid Churilov, Elif I Ekinci","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study assessed the concordance and misclassification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages between directly measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) and estimates of GFR (eGFR) using the creatinine-based CKD-EPI-2009 and the CKD-EPI-2021 equations in individuals with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 5,177 individuals across six international diabetes cohorts included mGFR measurements using exogenous filtration markers. We calculated an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), bias, precision and accuracy between mGFR and CKD-EPI estimates using a four-level mixed-effect linear variance component model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled cohort included people with type 1 (n = 1,748, median age: 33 years [IQR: 27, 40], mGFR = 104.2 ml/min per 1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) and type 2 diabetes (n = 3,429, median age: 66 years [IQR: 58, 73], mGFR = 58.4 ml/min per 1.73 m<sup>2</sup>). Both CKD-EPI equations showed good agreement (2009 ICC: 0.90; 2021 ICC: 0.87) but substantial bias (2009: 3.7 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>; 2021: 8.6 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>), low precision (2009: 12.4 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>; 2021: 13.91 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>), and limited accuracy (2009 p30: 77 %; 2021 p30: 70 %) compared to mGFR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of CKD-EPI equations has the potential for misdiagnosis and suboptimal CKD management in people with diabetes. Alternative methods of estimating kidney function for people with diabetes are needed to optimally manage diabetes-related kidney disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":" ","pages":"112104"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study assessed the concordance and misclassification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages between directly measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) and estimates of GFR (eGFR) using the creatinine-based CKD-EPI-2009 and the CKD-EPI-2021 equations in individuals with diabetes.

Methods: Data from 5,177 individuals across six international diabetes cohorts included mGFR measurements using exogenous filtration markers. We calculated an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), bias, precision and accuracy between mGFR and CKD-EPI estimates using a four-level mixed-effect linear variance component model.

Results: The pooled cohort included people with type 1 (n = 1,748, median age: 33 years [IQR: 27, 40], mGFR = 104.2 ml/min per 1.73 m2) and type 2 diabetes (n = 3,429, median age: 66 years [IQR: 58, 73], mGFR = 58.4 ml/min per 1.73 m2). Both CKD-EPI equations showed good agreement (2009 ICC: 0.90; 2021 ICC: 0.87) but substantial bias (2009: 3.7 ml/min/1.73 m2; 2021: 8.6 ml/min/1.73 m2), low precision (2009: 12.4 ml/min/1.73 m2; 2021: 13.91 ml/min/1.73 m2), and limited accuracy (2009 p30: 77 %; 2021 p30: 70 %) compared to mGFR.

Conclusion: The use of CKD-EPI equations has the potential for misdiagnosis and suboptimal CKD management in people with diabetes. Alternative methods of estimating kidney function for people with diabetes are needed to optimally manage diabetes-related kidney disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
期刊最新文献
Diabetes and pregnancy: A call for terminology standardization in clinical practice Comparative performance of CKD-EPI equations in people with diabetes: An international pooled analysis of individual participant data. How Europe is shaping the future of diabetes care. Nonlinear association between hemoglobin glycation index and mortality in ischemic stroke Patients: Insights from the MIMIC-IV database. Prescription patterns and the cost of antihyperglycemic drugs in patients with diabetes mellitus in Iran from 2014 to 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1